Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2025 / SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplines

SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplines

Paper · 2025 · M-A-P Team, Xinrun Du, Yifan Yao et al.

Summary

Popular LLM benchmarks such as MMLU, GPQA and MMLU-Pro focus on a small set of mainstream subjects, and top models now score close to their ceiling on them. That leaves many niche professional areas, such as light industry, agriculture and service-related fields, mostly untested. SuperGPQA addresses this with a multiple-choice benchmark that covers 285 graduate-level disciplines, with at least 50 questions for each one. The data was built in three stages. First, PhD-level experts chose trustworthy sources, preferring textbook problems that come with worked solutions. Next, crowd-sourced students from leading Chinese universities turned these into multiple-choice items and added distractors. Finally, rule-based checks, LLM-based checks and expert review removed trivial, ambiguous or flawed questions, and model accuracy was used to spot items that were too easy. The strongest systems are still far from solving it: DeepSeek-R1 leads with 61.82% accuracy. The authors also describe lessons from coordinating more than 80 expert annotators. This makes the work useful as a hard, broad evaluation set and as practical guidance for running large annotation projects.

Key points

  • Scope: 285 graduate-level disciplines, each with 50 or more questions. The collection pipeline has three stages: Source Screening, Transcription and Quality Inspection. Human annotators and LLMs work together to filter the questions.
  • Top results: DeepSeek-R1 scores 61.82% and o1 scores in a similar range. Reasoning-focused models perform best overall.
  • Instruction tuning helps a lot. DeepSeek-V3 scores 47.40 and its Base version 32.14, while Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct scores 40.75 and the base Qwen2.5-72B 34.33.
  • Stronger models are more consistent across difficulty levels. DeepSeek-R1 scores 63.59, 63.63 and 56.87 on the easy, middle and hard splits, while Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct falls from 44.82 to 19.97. Newer GPT-4o releases also score progressively higher, from 39.76 to 44.40.
  • Annotation lessons: answers on online exercise websites were often wrong. Models such as GPT-4o often repeated those same wrong solutions, which points to a risk of data leakage. Multiple-choice items made from calculation problems separated strong and weak models better than ready-made multiple-choice questions.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as M-A-P Team, Xinrun Du, Yifan Yao, Kaijing Ma, Bingli Wang, Tianyu Zheng, King Zhu, Minghao Liu, Yiming Liang, Xiaolong Jin, Zhenlin Wei, Chujie Zheng, Kaixin Deng, Shawn Gavin, Shian Jia, Sichao Jiang, Yiyan Liao, Rui Li, Qinrui Li, Sirun Li, Yizhi Li, Yunwen Li, David Ma, Yuansheng Ni, Haoran Que, Qiyao Wang, Zhoufutu Wen, Siwei Wu, Tyshawn Hsing, Ming Xu, Zhenzhu Yang, Zekun Moore Wang, Junting Zhou, Yuelin Bai, Xingyuan Bu, Chenglin Cai, Liang Chen, Yifan Chen, Chengtuo Cheng, Tianhao Cheng, Keyi Ding, Siming Huang, Yun Huang, Yaoru Li, Yizhe Li, Zhaoqun Li, Tianhao Liang, Chengdong Lin, Hongquan Lin, Yinghao Ma, Tianyang Pang, Zhongyuan Peng, Zifan Peng, Qige Qi, Shi Qiu, Xingwei Qu, Shanghaoran Quan, Yizhou Tan, Zili Wang, Chenqing Wang, Hao Wang, Yiya Wang, Yubo Wang, Jiajun Xu, Kexin Yang, Ruibin Yuan, Yuanhao Yue, Tianyang Zhan, Chun Zhang, Jinyang Zhang, Xiyue Zhang, Xingjian Zhang, Yue Zhang, Yongchi Zhao, Xiangyu Zheng, Chenghua Zhong, Yang Gao, Zhoujun Li, Dayiheng Liu, Qian Liu, Tianyu Liu, Shiwen Ni, Junran Peng, Yujia Qin, Wenbo Su, Guoyin Wang, Shi Wang, Jian Yang, Min Yang, Meng Cao, Xiang Yue, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Wangchunshu Zhou, Jiaheng Liu, Qunshu Lin, Wenhao Huang and Ge Zhang. 2025. SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplines. arXiv:2502.14739.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2502.14739 · arXiv 2502.14739

@misc{team2025supergpqa,
  title = {{SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplines}},
  author = {M-A-P Team, Xinrun Du, Yifan Yao, Kaijing Ma, Bingli Wang, Tianyu Zheng, King Zhu, Minghao Liu, Yiming Liang, Xiaolong Jin, Zhenlin Wei, Chujie Zheng, Kaixin Deng, Shawn Gavin, Shian Jia, Sichao Jiang, Yiyan Liao, Rui Li, Qinrui Li, Sirun Li, Yizhi Li, Yunwen Li, David Ma, Yuansheng Ni, Haoran Que, Qiyao Wang, Zhoufutu Wen, Siwei Wu, Tyshawn Hsing, Ming Xu, Zhenzhu Yang, Zekun Moore Wang, Junting Zhou, Yuelin Bai, Xingyuan Bu, Chenglin Cai, Liang Chen, Yifan Chen, Chengtuo Cheng, Tianhao Cheng, Keyi Ding, Siming Huang, Yun Huang, Yaoru Li, Yizhe Li, Zhaoqun Li, Tianhao Liang, Chengdong Lin, Hongquan Lin, Yinghao Ma, Tianyang Pang, Zhongyuan Peng, Zifan Peng, Qige Qi, Shi Qiu, Xingwei Qu, Shanghaoran Quan, Yizhou Tan, Zili Wang, Chenqing Wang, Hao Wang, Yiya Wang, Yubo Wang, Jiajun Xu, Kexin Yang, Ruibin Yuan, Yuanhao Yue, Tianyang Zhan, Chun Zhang, Jinyang Zhang, Xiyue Zhang, Xingjian Zhang, Yue Zhang, Yongchi Zhao, Xiangyu Zheng, Chenghua Zhong, Yang Gao, Zhoujun Li, Dayiheng Liu, Qian Liu, Tianyu Liu, Shiwen Ni, Junran Peng, Yujia Qin, Wenbo Su, Guoyin Wang, Shi Wang, Jian Yang, Min Yang, Meng Cao, Xiang Yue, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Wangchunshu Zhou, Jiaheng Liu, Qunshu Lin, Wenhao Huang and Ge Zhang},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2502.14739},
  eprint = {2502.14739},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2502.14739}
}

References

64 references, 36 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. M. Abdin, J. Aneja, H. S. Behl, S. Bubeck, R. Eldan, S. Gunasekar, M. Harrison, R. J. Hewett, M. Javaheripi, P. Kauffmann, J. R. Lee, Y. T. Lee, Y. Li, W. Liu, C. C. T. Mendes, A. Nguyen, E. Price, G. de Rosa, O. Saarikivi, A. Salim, S. Shah, X. Wang, R. Ward, Y. Wu, D. Yu, C. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. P… — Phi-4 Technical Report
  2. AI-MO. Aimo validation aime, 2024. URL https://huggingface.co/datasets/AI -MO/aimo-validation-aime . Validation set containing 90 AIME problems from 2022-2024 contests. ↗
  3. AI@Meta. Llama 3 model card. 2024. URL https://github.com/meta-llama/lla ma3/blob/main/MODEL_CARD.md . ↗
  4. Anthropic. Claude 3.5 sonnet model card addendum, 2024. URL https://www.pa perswithcode.com/paper/claude-3-5-sonnet-model-card-addendum . ↗
  5. G. Bai, J. Liu, X. Bu, Y. He, J. Liu, Z. Zhou, Z. Lin, W. Su, T. Ge, B. Zheng, et al. Mt-bench-101: A fine-grained benchmark for evaluating large language models in multi-turn dialogues. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14762, 2024.
  6. K. Chernyshev, V. Polshkov, E. Artemova, A. Myasnikov, V. Stepanov, A. Miasnikov, and S. Tilga. U-math: A university-level benchmark for evaluating mathematical skills in llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03205, 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.03205. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03205 . Version v3: 1… ↗
  7. K. Cobbe, V. Kosaraju, M. Bavarian, M. Chen, H. Jun, L. Kaiser, M. Plappert, J. Tworek, J. Hilton, R. Nakano, C. Hesse, and J. Schulman. Training verifiers to solve math word problems, 2021.
  8. A. Dubey, A. Jauhri, A. Pandey, A. Kadian, A. Al-Dahle, A. Letman, A. Mathur, A. Schelten, A. Yang, A. Fan, et al. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783, 2024.
  9. Z. Fei, X. Shen, D. Zhu, F. Zhou, Z. Han, S. Zhang, K. Chen, Z. Shen, and J. Ge. Lawbench: Benchmarking legal knowledge of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16289, 2023.
  10. K. Fronsdal, A. Gulati, B. Miranda, E. Chen, E. Xia, B. de Moraes Dumont, and S. Koyejo. Putnam-axiom: A functional and static benchmark for measuring higher level mathematical reasoning. NeurIPS 2024 Workshop on MATH-AI, October 2024. find
  11. URL https://openreview.net/pdf?id=YXnwlZe0yf . Published: 09 Oct 2024, Last Modified: 09 Oct 2024. ↗
  12. B. Gao, F. Song, Z. Yang, Z. Cai, Y. Miao, Q. Dong, L. Li, C. Ma, L. Chen, R. Xu, Z. Tang, B. Wang, D. Zan, S. Quan, G. Zhang, L. Sha, Y. Zhang, X. Ren, T. Liu, and B. Chang. Omni-math: A universal olympiad level mathematic benchmark for large language models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07… ↗
  13. A. P. Gema, J. O. J. Leang, G. Hong, A. Devoto, A. C. M. Mancino, R. Saxena, X. He, Y. Zhao, X. Du, M. R. G. Madani, et al. Are we done with mmlu? arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04127, 2024. find
  14. I. Granite Team. Granite 3.0 language models, 2024. find
  15. D. Guo, D. Yang, H. Zhang, J. Song, R. Zhang, R. Xu, Q. Zhu, S. Ma, P. Wang, X. Bi, et al. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948, 2025.
  16. Y. He, S. Li, J. Liu, Y. Tan, W. Wang, H. Huang, X. Bu, H. Guo, C. Hu, B. Zheng, Z. Lin, X. Liu, D. Sun, S. Lin, Z. Zheng, X. Zhu, W. Su, and B. Zheng. Chinese simpleqa: A chinese factuality evaluation for large language models, 2024a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07140 . ↗
  17. Y. He, S. Li, J. Liu, Y. Tan, W. Wang, H. Huang, X. Bu, H. Guo, C. Hu, B. Zheng, Z. Lin, X. Liu, D. Sun, S. Lin, Z. Zheng, X. Zhu, W. Su, and B. Zheng. Chinese simpleqa: A chinese factuality evaluation for large language models, 2024b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07140 . ↗
  18. D. Hendrycks, C. Burns, S. Basart, A. Zou, M. Mazeika, D. Song, and J. Steinhardt. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300, 2020.
  19. A. Q. Jiang, A. Sablayrolles, A. Mensch, C. Bamford, D. S. Chaplot, D. d. l. Casas, F. Bressand, G. Lengyel, G. Lample, L. Saulnier, et al. Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825, 2023. find
  20. A. Q. Jiang, A. Sablayrolles, A. Roux, A. Mensch, B. Savary, C. Bamford, D. S. Chaplot, D. d. l. Casas, E. B. Hanna, F. Bressand, et al. Mixtral of experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04088, 2024. find
  21. D. Jin, E. Pan, N. Oufattole, W.-H. Weng, H. Fang, and P. Szolovits. What disease does this patient have? a large-scale open domain question answering dataset from medical exams. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.13081, 2020.
  22. Y. Jin, Z. Li, C. Zhang, T. Cao, Y. Gao, P. Jayarao, M. Li, X. Liu, R. Sarkhel, X. Tang, et al. Shopping mmlu: A massive multi-task online shopping benchmark for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20745, 2024. — [arXiv:2410.20745](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.20745) find
  23. A. Li, B. Gong, B. Yang, B. Shan, C. Liu, C. Zhu, C. Zhang, C. Guo, D. Chen, D. Li, et al. Minimax-01: Scaling foundation models with lightning attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.08313, 2025.
  24. Z. Li, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, D. Long, P. Xie, and M. Zhang. Towards general text embeddings with multi-stage contrastive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03281, 2023.
  25. A. Liu, B. Feng, B. Xue, B. Wang, B. Wu, C. Lu, C. Zhao, C. Deng, C. Zhang, C. Ruan, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437, 2024. find
  26. Z. Liu, B. Tan, H. Wang, W. Neiswanger, T. Tao, H. Li, F. Koto, Y. Wang, S. Sun, O. Pangarkar, R. Fan, Y. Gu, V. Miller, L. Ma, L. Tang, N. Ranjan, Y. Zhuang, G. He, R. Wang, M. Deng, R. Algayres, Y. Li, Z. Shen, P. Nakov, and E. Xing. Llm360 k2: Building a 65b 360-open-source large language model f… find
  27. K. Ma, X. Du, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. Wen, X. Qu, J. Yang, J. Liu, M. Liu, X. Yue, W. Huang, and G. Zhang. Kor-bench: Benchmarking language models on knowledge-orthogonal reasoning tasks, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06526 . — [arXiv:2410.06526](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06526) ↗
  28. A. of Problem Solving. Aime problems and solutions, 2024. URL https://artofpro blemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/AIME_Problems_and_Solutions . Online resource for AIME competition problems. find
  29. T. OLMo, P. Walsh, L. Soldaini, D. Groeneveld, K. Lo, S. Arora, A. Bhagia, Y. Gu, S. Huang, M. Jordan, et al. 2 olmo 2 furious. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00656, 2024. find
  30. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. PREPRINT, 2023.
  31. OpenAI. Gpt-4o system card. Technical report, OpenAI, 2024a. https://www.openai.com/research/gpt-4o . ↗
  32. OpenAI. o1 system card. Technical report, OpenAI, 2024b. — OpenAI o1 System Card https://openai.com/o1/ . ↗
  33. OpenAI. o3-mini system card. Technical report, OpenAI, 2025. https://openai.com/index/openai-o3-mini/ . ↗
  34. A. Pal, L. K. Umapathi, and M. Sankarasubbu. Medmcqa: A large-scale multi-subject multi-choice dataset for medical domain question answering. In G. Flores, G. H. Chen, T. Pollard, J. C. Ho, and T. Naumann, editors, Proceedings of the Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, volume 174 of Proce… — MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answering
  35. L. Phan, A. Gatti, Z. Han, N. Li, J. Hu, H. Zhang, S. Shi, M. Choi, A. Agrawal, A. Chopra, A. Khoja, R. Kim, J. Hausenloy, O. Zhang, M. Mazeika, D. Anderson, T. Nguyen, M. Mahmood, F. Feng, S. Y. Feng, H. Zhao, M. Yu, V. Gangal, C. Zou, Z. Wang, J. P. Wang, P. Kumar, O. Pokutnyi, R. Gerbicz, S. Popo… — Humanity's Last Exam
  36. D. Rein, B. L. Hou, A. C. Stickland, J. Petty, R. Y. Pang, J. Dirani, J. Michael, and S. R. Bowman. Gpqa: A graduate-level google-proof q&a benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12022, 2023.
  37. A. Srivastava, A. Rastogi, A. Rao, A. A. M. Shoeb, A. Abid, A. Fisch, A. R. Brown, A. Santoro, A. Gupta, A. Garriga-Alonso, A. Kluska, A. Lewkowycz, A. Agarwal, A. Power, A. Ray, A. Warstadt, A. W. Kocurek, A. Safaya, A. Tazarv, A. Xiang, A. Parrish, A. Nie, A. Hussain, A. Askell, A. Dsouza, A. Raha… — Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
  38. A. Talmor, J. Herzig, N. Lourie, and J. Berant. Commonsenseqa: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge. In J. Burstein, C. Doran, and T. Solorio, editors, Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human L…
  39. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. doi: 10.18653/v1/n19-1421. URL https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1421 . ↗
  40. G. Team. Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2312.11805, 2023.
  41. G. Team. Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context, 2024a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05530 . ↗
  42. G. Team, M. Riviere, S. Pathak, P. G. Sessa, C. Hardin, S. Bhupatiraju, L. Hussenot, T. Mesnard, B. Shahriari, A. Ramé, et al. Gemma 2: Improving open language models at a practical size. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00118, 2024. find
  43. Q. Team. Qwq: Reflect deeply on the boundaries of the unknown, November 2024b. find
  44. URL — Yi-Lightning Technical Report https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwq-32b-preview/ . A. Wake, B. Chen, C. Lv, C. Li, C. Huang, C. Cai, C. Zheng, D. Cooper, F. Zhou, F. Hu, et al. Yi-lightning technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.01253, 2024. ↗
  45. A. Wang, Y. Pruksachatkun, N. Nangia, A. Singh, J. Michael, F. Hill, O. Levy, and S. R. Bowman. Superglue: A stickier benchmark for general-purpose language understanding systems. In H. M. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d’Alché-Buc, E. B. Fox, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural…
  46. A. Wang, A. Singh, J. Michael, F. Hill, O. Levy, and S. R. Bowman. GLUE: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019.
  47. OpenReview.net, 2019b. URL https://openreview.net/forum?i d=rJ4km2R5t7 . ↗
  48. P. Wang, Y. Wu, Z. M. Wang, J. Liu, X. Song, Z. Peng, K. Deng, C. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Peng, G. Zhang, H. Guo, Z. Zhang, W. Su, and B. Zheng. Mtu-bench: A multi-granularity tool-use benchmark for large language models. ArXiv, abs/2410.11710, 2024a. — [arXiv:2410.11710](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11710) find
  49. Y. Wang, X. Ma, G. Zhang, Y. Ni, A. Chandra, S. Guo, W. Ren, A. Arulraj, X. He, Z. Jiang, T. Li, M. Ku, K. Wang, A. Zhuang, R. Fan, X. Yue, and W. Chen. Mmlu-pro: A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)…
  50. J. Wei, N. Karina, H. W. Chung, Y. J. Jiao, S. Papay, A. Glaese, J. Schulman, and W. Fedus. Measuring short-form factuality in large language models. ArXiv, abs/2411.04368, 2024a. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:273877483 . ↗
  51. J. Wei, N. Karina, H. W. Chung, Y. J. Jiao, S. Papay, A. Glaese, J. Schulman, and W. Fedus. Measuring short-form factuality in large language models, 2024b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04368 . ↗
  52. S. Wu, Z. Peng, X. Du, T. Zheng, M. Liu, J. Wu, J. Ma, Y. Li, J. Yang, W. Zhou, Q. Lin, J. Zhao, Z. Zhang, W. Huang, G. Zhang, C. Lin, and J. H. Liu. A comparative study on reasoning patterns of openai’s o1 model, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/24 10.13639 . ↗
  53. A. Yang, B. Yang, B. Zhang, B. Hui, B. Zheng, B. Yu, C. Li, D. Liu, F. Huang, H. Wei, et al. Qwen2. 5 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15115, 2024a. find
  54. B. Yang, Q. Yang, and R. Liu. Utmath: Math evaluation with unit test via reasoning-to-coding thoughts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07240, 2024b. — [arXiv:2411.07240](https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07240) find
  55. Z. Yang, P. Qi, S. Zhang, Y. Bengio, W. W. Cohen, R. Salakhutdinov, and C. D. Manning. Hotpotqa: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering. In E. Riloff, D. Chiang, J. Hockenmaier, and J. Tsujii, editors, Proceedings of the 2018
  56. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Brussels, Belgium, October 31 - November 4, 2018, pages 2369–2380. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018. doi: 10.18653/v1/d18-1259. URL https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d18-1 259 . ↗
  57. A. A. Young, B. Chen, C. Li, C. Huang, G. Zhang, G. Zhang, H. Li, J. Zhu, J. Chen, J. Chang, K. Yu, P. Liu, Q. Liu, S. Yue, S. Yang, S. Yang, T. Yu, W. Xie, W. Huang, X. Hu, X. Ren, X. Niu, P. Nie, Y. Xu, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Cai, Z. Gu, Z. Liu, and Z. Dai. Yi: Open foundation models by 01.ai. ArXiv,…
  58. R. Yuan, H. Lin, Y. Wang, Z. Tian, S. Wu, T. Shen, G. Zhang, Y. Wu, C. Liu, Z. Zhou, Z. Ma, L. Xue, Z. Wang, Q. Liu, T. Zheng, Y. Li, Y. Ma, Y. Liang, X. Chi, R. Liu, Z. Wang, P. Li, J. Wu, C. Lin, Q. Liu, T. Jiang, W. Huang, W. Chen, E. Benetos, J. Fu, G. Xia, R. Dannenberg, W. Xue, S. Kang, and Y.… find
  59. R. Zellers, A. Holtzman, Y. Bisk, A. Farhadi, and Y. Choi. Hellaswag: Can a machine really finish your sentence? In A. Korhonen, D. R. Traum, and L. Màrquez, editors, Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2, 20… find
  60. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. doi: 10.18653/v1/p19-1472. URL https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p19-1472 . ↗
  61. G. Zhang, S. Qu, J. Liu, C. Zhang, C. Lin, C. L. Yu, D. Pan, E. Cheng, J. Liu, Q. Lin, et al. Map-neo: Highly capable and transparent bilingual large language model series. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19327, 2024a. find
  62. X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, D. Long, W. Xie, Z. Dai, J. Tang, H. Lin, B. Yang, P. Xie, F. Huang, et al. mgte: Generalized long-context text representation and reranking models for multilingual text retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.19669, 2024b.
  63. Q. Zhao, Y. Huang, T. Lv, L. Cui, Q. Sun, S. Mao, X. Zhang, Y. Xin, Q. Yin, S. Li, and F. Wei. Mmlu-cf: A contamination-free multi-task language understanding benchmark, 2024.
  64. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15194 . K. Zhu, Q. Zang, S. Jia, S. Wu, F. Fang, Y. Li, S. Gavin, T. Zheng, J. Guo, B. Li, et al. Lime: Less is more for mllm evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06851, 2024. ↗

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/team-2025-supergpqa-scaling-llm-evaluation-across/