Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2026 / Automatic Combination of Sample Selection Strategies for Few-Shot Learning

Automatic Combination of Sample Selection Strategies for Few-Shot Learning

Paper · 2026 · Branislav Pecher, Ivan Srba, Maria Bielikova et al.

Summary

Picking which labelled examples to use strongly affects few-shot performance. Methods for large language models tend to rely on selectors built for specific in-context learning setups and overlook classic strategies from supervised learning, such as active learning and core-set methods. The authors propose ACSESS, which works in three stages:

  1. It defines a pool of single-property selection strategies covering informativeness, representativeness and learnability.
  2. It identifies the subset of those strategies that actually helps.
  3. It merges their normalised per-sample scores in a weighted sum and keeps the top-N samples.

The evaluation covers 23 strategies, 5 in-context learning models, and 3 gradient-based approaches (meta-learning and few-shot fine-tuning), on 6 text and 8 image datasets. The combined selection beats every individual strategy and matches or surpasses selectors tailored to in-context learning. Selection helps most with few shots or noisy data, and its advantage fades as more shots are added. This suggests that well-established, general-purpose criteria, when combined, remain a strong and portable option across very different few-shot paradigms.

Key points

  • Models tested: the in-context learning models are Mistral-7B, Zephyr-7B, LLaMA-3.1-8B, Gemma-3-4B and Qwen-2.5-7B. Image datasets include collections from MetaAlbum.
  • Gains from selection: up to about 5 percentage points for in-context learning and about 3 for gradient few-shot learning, with results varying strongly by dataset and approach.
  • Effect of shot count: around 30–40 shots, all strategies perform roughly like random selection. Adding more shots stops helping beyond about 30 for in-context learning and about 50 for gradient methods.
  • Small data pools: selecting from only 25% of the data (in-context learning) or 10% (gradient methods) yields performance similar to selecting from the full dataset.
  • Code and compute: code is released at github.com/kinit-sk/ACSESS. Experiments took roughly 2,500 A100 GPU-hours, estimated at about 270 kgCO2eq.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Branislav Pecher, Ivan Srba, Maria Bielikova and Joaquin Vanschoren. 2026. Automatic Combination of Sample Selection Strategies for Few-Shot Learning. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2008

@inproceedings{pecher2026automatic,
  title = {{Automatic Combination of Sample Selection Strategies for Few-Shot Learning}},
  author = {Branislav Pecher, Ivan Srba, Maria Bielikova and Joaquin Vanschoren},
  booktitle = {Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2008},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2008}
}

References

85 references, 21 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Mayank Agarwal, Mikhail Yurochkin, and Yuekai Sun. 2021. On sensitivity of meta-learning to support data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:20447–20460. find
  2. Sharat Agarwal, Himanshu Arora, Saket Anand, and Chetan Arora. 2020. Contextual diversity for active learning. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XVI 16, pages 137–153. Springer. find
  3. Sweta Agrawal, Chunting Zhou, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Marjan Ghazvininejad. 2023. In-context examples selection for machine translation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 8857–8873, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. Aroof Aimen, Bharat Ladrecha, Sahil Sidheekh, and Narayanan C Krishnan. 2023. Leveraging task variability in meta-learning. SN Computer Science, 4(5):539. find
  5. Alon Albalak, Yanai Elazar, Sang Michael Xie, Shayne Longpre, Nathan Lambert, Xinyi Wang, Niklas Muennighoff, Bairu Hou, Liangming Pan, Haewon Jeong, Colin Raffel, Shiyu Chang, Tatsunori Hashimoto, and William Yang Wang. 2024. A survey on data selection for language models. Transactions on Machine L…
  6. Shengnan An, Bo Zhou, Zeqi Lin, Qiang Fu, Bei Chen, Nanning Zheng, Weizhu Chen, and Jian-Guang Lou. 2023. Skill-based few-shot selection for in-context learning. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 13472–13492, Singapore. ACL. find
  7. Jan Cegin, Branislav Pecher, Jakub Simko, Ivan Srba, Maria Bielikova, and Peter Brusilovsky. 2025. Use random selection for now: Investigation of few-shot selection strategies in LLM-based text augmentation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pages 5533–5550, S… find
  8. Ting-Yun Chang and Robin Jia. 2023. Data curation alone can stabilize in-context learning. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8123–8144, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  9. Wei-Yu Chen, Yen-Cheng Liu, Zsolt Kira, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, and Jia-Bin Huang. 2019. A closer look at few-shot classification. In International Conference on Learning Representations. and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3816–383… find
  10. Yutian Chen, Max Welling, and Alex Smola. 2010. Super-samples from kernel herding. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI’10, page 109–116, Arlington, Virginia, USA. AUAI Press. find
  11. Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Alex Vaughan, and 1 others. 2024. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783.
  12. Cody Coleman, Christopher Yeh, Stephen Mussmann, Baharan Mirzasoleiman, Peter Bailis, Percy Liang, Jure Leskovec, and Matei Zaharia. 2020. Selection via proxy: Efficient data selection for deep learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations. find
  13. Chengcheng Guo, Bo Zhao, and Yanbing Bai. 2022. Deepcore: A comprehensive library for coreset selection in deep learning. In International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pages 181–195. Springer. find
  14. Alice Coucke, Alaa Saade, Adrien Ball, Théodore Bluche, Alexandre Caulier, David Leroy, Clément Doumouro, Thibault Gisselbrecht, Francesco Caltagirone, Thibaut Lavril, and 1 others. 2018. Snips voice platform: an embedded spoken language understanding system for private-by-design voice interfaces. a…
  15. Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2009. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 248–255. Ieee. find
  16. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL: Human Language Technologies, pages 4171–4186, Minneapolis, Minneso…
  17. Shizhe Diao, Pengcheng Wang, Yong Lin, Rui Pan, Xiang Liu, and Tong Zhang. 2024. Active prompting with chain-of-thought for large language models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1330–1350, Bangkok, Thailand. A… find
  18. Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Jingjing Xu, and Zhifang Sui. 2022. A survey for in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00234.
  19. Melanie Ducoffe and Frederic Precioso. 2018. Adversarial active learning for deep networks: a margin based approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.09841. — [arXiv:1802.09841](https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.09841) find
  20. Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2017. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1126–1135. PMLR.
  21. Tianyu Gao, Adam Fisch, and Danqi Chen. 2021. Making pre-trained language models better few-shot learners. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Vivek Gupta, Akshat Shrivastava, Adithya Sagar, Armen Aghajanyan, and Denis Savenkov. 2022. RetroNLU:…
  22. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770– 778.
  23. Charles T. Hemphill, John J. Godfrey, and George R. Doddington. 1990. The ATIS spoken language systems pilot corpus. In Speech and Natural Language: Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Hidden Valley, Pennsylvania, June 24-27,1990. find
  24. Timothy Hospedales, Antreas Antoniou, Paul Micaelli, and Amos Storkey. 2021. Meta-learning in neural networks: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(9):5149–5169. find
  25. Andrew Ilyas, Sung Min Park, Logan Engstrom, Guillaume Leclerc, and Aleksander Madry. 2022. Datamodels: Predicting predictions from training data. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning. find
  26. Rishabh Iyer, Ninad Khargoankar, Jeff Bilmes, and Himanshu Asanani. 2021. Submodular combinatorial information measures with applications in machine learning. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory, volume 132 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, p… find
  27. Rishabh K Iyer and Jeff A Bilmes. 2013. Submodular optimization with submodular cover and submodular knapsack constraints. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 26. Curran Associates, Inc. find
  28. Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, and 1 others. 2023. Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825. find
  29. Iman Jundi and Gabriella Lapesa. 2022. How to translate your samples and choose your shots? analyzing translate-train & few-shot cross-lingual transfer. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022, pages 129–150, Seattle, United States. Association for Computational Ling… find
  30. Xingkun Liu, Arash Eshghi, Pawel Swietojanski, and Verena Rieser. 2021. Benchmarking natural language understanding services for building conversational agents. In Increasing Naturalness and Flexibility in Spoken Dialogue Interaction: 10th International Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems, pages 165… find
  31. Krishnateja Killamsetty, Durga Sivasubramanian, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, and Rishabh Iyer. 2021. Glister: Generalization based data subset selection for efficient and robust learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, pages 8110–8118. find
  32. Man Luo, Xin Xu, Zhuyun Dai, Panupong Pasupat, Mehran Kazemi, Chitta Baral, Vaiva Imbrasaite, and Vincent Y Zhao. 2023. Dr. icl: Demonstration-retrieved in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14128. — [arXiv:2305.14128](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14128) find
  33. Abdullatif Köksal, Timo Schick, and Hinrich Schütze. 2022. Meal: Stable and active learning for few-shot prompting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.08358. find
  34. Ken Lang. 1995. Newsweeder: Learning to filter netnews. In Machine Learning Proceedings 1995, pages 331–339. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (CA). find
  35. Itay Levy, Ben Bogin, and Jonathan Berant. 2023. Diverse demonstrations improve in-context compositional generalization. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1401– 1422, Toronto, Canada. ACL.
  36. Xiaonan Li, Kai Lv, Hang Yan, Tianyang Lin, Wei Zhu, Yuan Ni, Guotong Xie, Xiaoling Wang, and Xipeng Qiu. 2023. Unified demonstration retriever for in-context learning. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4644–4668…
  37. Xiaonan Li and Xipeng Qiu. 2023. Finding support examples for in-context learning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 6219–6235, Singapore. ACL.
  38. Hongfu Liu and Ye Wang. 2023. Towards informative few-shot prompt with maximum information gain for in-context learning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 15825–15838. find
  39. Jiachang Liu, Dinghan Shen, Yizhe Zhang, Bill Dolan, Lawrence Carin, and Weizhu Chen. 2022. What makes good in-context examples for GPT-3? In Proceedings of Deep Learning Inside Out (DeeLIO 2022): The 3rd Workshop on Knowledge Extraction and Integration for Deep Learning Architectures, pages 100–114…
  40. Pengfei Liu, Weizhe Yuan, Jinlan Fu, Zhengbao Jiang, Hiroaki Hayashi, and Graham Neubig. 2023. Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Comput. Surv., 55(9).
  41. Huan Ma, Changqing Zhang, Yatao Bian, Lemao Liu, Zhirui Zhang, Peilin Zhao, Shu Zhang, Huazhu Fu, Qinghua Hu, and Bingzhe Wu. 2023. Fairness-guided few-shot prompting for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13217.
  42. Katerina Margatina, Giorgos Vernikos, Loïc Barrault, and Nikolaos Aletras. 2021. Active learning by acquiring contrastive examples. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 650–663, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. ACL. find
  43. Antonis Maronikolakis, Paul O’Grady, Hinrich Schütze, and Matti Lyra. 2023. Improving few-shot learning with multilingual transfer and Monte Carlo training set selection. In Proceedings of the 2023 CLASP Conference on Learning with Small Data (LSD), pages 1–10, Gothenburg, Sweden. Association for Co… find
  44. Costas Mavromatis, Balasubramaniam Srinivasan, Zhengyuan Shen, Jiani Zhang, Huzefa Rangwala, Christos Faloutsos, and George Karypis. 2023. Which examples to annotate for in-context learning? towards effective and efficient selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.20046. — [arXiv:2310.20046](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20046) find
  45. Baharan Mirzasoleiman, Jeff Bilmes, and Jure Leskovec. 2020. Coresets for data-efficient training of machine learning models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 6950–6960. PMLR. find
  46. Rishabh Misra. 2022. News category dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11429. — [arXiv:2209.11429](https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.11429) find
  47. Noor Nashid, Mifta Sintaha, and Ali Mesbah. 2023. Retrieval-based prompt selection for code-related few-shot learning. In 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pages 2450–2462. find
  48. Tai Nguyen and Eric Wong. 2023. In-context example selection with influences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11042. — [arXiv:2302.11042](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.11042) find
  49. Dongmin Park, Dimitris Papailiopoulos, and Kangwook Lee. 2022. Active learning is a strong baseline for data subset selection. In Has it Trained Yet? NeurIPS 2022 Workshop. find
  50. Panupong Pasupat, Yuan Zhang, and Kelvin Guu. 2021. Controllable semantic parsing via retrieval augmentation. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 7683–7698, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguisti… find
  51. Mansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, and Gintare Karolina Dziugaite. 2021. Deep learning on a data diet: Finding important examples early in training. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 20596–20607. Curran Associates, Inc. find
  52. Branislav Pecher, Ivan Srba, and Maria Bielikova. 2024. A survey on stability of learning with limited labelled data and its sensitivity to the effects of randomness. ACM Comput. Surv., 57(1). find
  53. Kiran Purohit, Venktesh V, Sourangshu Bhattacharya, and Avishek Anand. 2025. Sample efficient demonstration selection for in-context learning. In Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning. find
  54. Kiran Purohit, Venktesh V, Raghuram Devalla, Krishna Mohan Yerragorla, Sourangshu Bhattacharya, and Avishek Anand. 2024. EXPLORA: Efficient exemplar subset selection for complex reasoning. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5367–5388, Mia… find
  55. Chengwei Qin, Aston Zhang, Anirudh Dagar, and Wenming Ye. 2023. In-context learning with iterative demonstration selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.09881. find
  56. Pengzhen Ren, Yun Xiao, Xiaojun Chang, Po-Yao Huang, Zhihui Li, Brij B. Gupta, Xiaojiang Chen, and Xin Wang. 2021. A survey of deep active learning. ACM Comput. Surv., 54(9). find
  57. Ohad Rubin, Jonathan Herzig, and Jonathan Berant. 2022. Learning to retrieve prompts for in-context learning. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 2655–2671, Seattle, United States. AC…
  58. Alexander Scarlatos and Andrew Lan. 2023. Reticl: Sequential retrieval of in-context examples with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14502. — [arXiv:2305.14502](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14502) find
  59. Christopher Schröder, Andreas Niekler, and Martin Potthast. 2022. Revisiting uncertainty-based query strategies for active learning with transformers. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, pages 2194–2203, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  60. Sebastian Schuster, Sonal Gupta, Rushin Shah, and Mike Lewis. 2019. Cross-lingual transfer learning for multilingual task oriented dialog. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long…
  61. Ozan Sener and Silvio Savarese. 2018. Active learning for convolutional neural networks: A core-set approach. In International Conference on Learning Representations. find
  62. Richard Shin, Christopher Lin, Sam Thomson, Charles Chen, Subhro Roy, Emmanouil Antonios Platanios, Adam Pauls, Dan Klein, Jason Eisner, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2021. Constrained language models yield few-shot semantic parsers. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural La… find
  63. Kashun Shum, Shizhe Diao, and Tong Zhang. 2023. Automatic prompt augmentation and selection with chain-of-thought from labeled data. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 12113–12139, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  64. Jake Snell, Kevin Swersky, and Richard Zemel. 2017. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30. find
  65. Yisheng Song, Ting Wang, Puyu Cai, Subrota K. Mondal, and Jyoti Prakash Sahoo. 2023. A comprehensive survey of few-shot learning: Evolution, applications, challenges, and opportunities. ACM Comput. Surv., 55(13s). find
  66. Hongjin Su, Jungo Kasai, Chen Henry Wu, Weijia Shi, Tianlu Wang, Jiayi Xin, Rui Zhang, Mari Ostendorf, Luke Zettlemoyer, Noah A Smith, and 1 others. 2022. Selective annotation makes language models better few-shot learners. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations. find
  67. Xiaofei Sun, Linfeng Dong, Xiaoya Li, Zhen Wan, Shuhe Wang, Tianwei Zhang, Jiwei Li, Fei Cheng, Lingjuan Lyu, Fei Wu, and 1 others. 2023. Pushing the limits of chatgpt on nlp tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09719.
  68. Swabha Swayamdipta, Roy Schwartz, Nicholas Lourie, Yizhong Wang, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Noah A. Smith, and Yejin Choi. 2020. Dataset cartography: Mapping and diagnosing datasets with training dynamics. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), p… find
  69. Qwen Team. 2024. Qwen2.5: A party of foundation models. find
  70. Robert Tibshirani. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 58(1):267– 288. find
  71. Mariya Toneva, Alessandro Sordoni, Remi Tachet des Combes, Adam Trischler, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey J Gordon. 2018. An empirical study of example forgetting during deep neural network learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations. find
  72. Lewis Tunstall, Edward Beeching, Nathan Lambert, Nazneen Rajani, Kashif Rasul, Younes Belkada, Shengyi Huang, Leandro von Werra, Clémentine Fourrier, Nathan Habib, and 1 others. 2023. Zephyr: Direct distillation of lm alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16944. find
  73. Ihsan Ullah, Dustin Carrion, Sergio Escalera, Isabelle M Guyon, Mike Huisman, Felix Mohr, Jan N van Rijn, Haozhe Sun, Joaquin Vanschoren, and Phan Anh Vu. 2022. Meta-album: Multi-domain meta-dataset for few-shot image classification. In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing System… find
  74. Joaquin Vanschoren. 2018. Meta-learning: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.03548. — [arXiv:1810.03548](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03548) find
  75. David Vilar, Markus Freitag, Colin Cherry, Jiaming Luo, Viresh Ratnakar, and George Foster. 2023. Prompting PaLM for translation: Assessing strategies and performance. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 15406– 154… find
  76. Jingyao Wang, Zeen Song, Xingzhe Su, Lingyu Si, Hongwei Dong, Wenwen Qiang, and Changwen Zheng. 2023. Learning to sample tasks for meta learning. Preprint, arXiv:2307.08924. — [arXiv:2307.08924](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.08924) find
  77. Shuohang Wang, Yichong Xu, Yuwei Fang, Yang Liu, Siqi Sun, Ruochen Xu, Chenguang Zhu, and Michael Zeng. 2022. Training data is more valuable than you think: A simple and effective method by retrieving from training data. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational… find
  78. Max Welling. 2009. Herding dynamical weights to learn. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML ’09, page 1121–1128, New York, NY, USA. ACM. find
  79. Zhiyong Wu, Yaoxiang Wang, Jiacheng Ye, and Lingpeng Kong. 2023. Self-adaptive in-context learning: An information compression perspective for in-context example selection and ordering. Preprint, arXiv:2212.10375. find
  80. Xi Ye, Srinivasan Iyer, Asli Celikyilmaz, Veselin Stoyanov, Greg Durrett, and Ramakanth Pasunuru. 2023. Complementary explanations for effective in-context learning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 4469–4484, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computationa…
  81. Ruonan Yu, Songhua Liu, and Xinchao Wang. 2023. Dataset distillation: A comprehensive review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07014. — [arXiv:2301.07014](https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.07014) find
  82. Yury Zemlyanskiy, Michiel de Jong, Joshua Ainslie, Panupong Pasupat, Peter Shaw, Linlu Qiu, Sumit Sanghai, and Fei Sha. 2022. Generate-and-retrieve: Use your predictions to improve retrieval for semantic parsing. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages… find
  83. Mike Zhang and Barbara Plank. 2021. Cartography active learning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, pages 395– 406, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. ACL. find
  84. Yiming Zhang, Shi Feng, and Chenhao Tan. 2022. Active example selection for in-context learning. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 9134– 9148, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  85. Chunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer, Jiao Sun, Yuning Mao, Xuezhe Ma, Avia Efrat, Ping Yu, Lili Yu, and 1 others. 2024. Lima: Less is more for alignment. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/pecher-2026-automatic-combination-sample-selection-strategies/