Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2024 / O1 Replication Journey: A Strategic Progress Report — Part 1

O1 Replication Journey: A Strategic Progress Report — Part 1

Paper · 2024 · Yiwei Qin, Xuefeng Li, Haoyang Zou et al.

Summary

OpenAI's O1 model showed strong multi-step reasoning, but its training recipe, data and full outputs were never disclosed. The GAIR group (Shanghai Jiao Tong University, NYU, MBZUAI) set out to reproduce its behavior. Their stated priority was to document the attempt openly as it happened, not to match O1's scores. The report records their work from 12 September to 8 October 2024, including failed attempts. It proposes the "progress report" as an alternative to the conventional paper, with ongoing updates and full disclosure of the process.

On the technical side, they built long chains of thought from reasoning trees, using a process-level reward model to guide construction. From this they derived "journey learning." In this approach, a model is fine-tuned on complete solution paths that include errors, reflection and backtracking, not only on clean, direct solutions ("shortcut learning"). Using just 327 training examples, journey learning beat standard supervised fine-tuning by roughly 8 points on MATH. The result suggests that exposure to the exploration process may be central to O1-style reasoning.

Key points

  • Journey learning, trained on 327 samples with no extra tricks, beat shortcut learning on MATH500 by 8.4% and 8.0%. The figure gives these two numbers without stating what distinguishes them.
  • The pipeline has three tracks:
    • a Process-Level Reward Model,
    • Construction of Reasoning Tree,
    • Integrating Reasoning Tree into Long Thought.
  • The planning table lists DeepSeekMath-7B + Abel as the policy model and o1-mini as the reward model. Data sources include OlympicArena, Gaokao and the o1 API.
  • Released materials include:
    • technical hypotheses and a cognitive exploration map,
    • brainstorming documents,
    • interim data,
    • a custom annotation platform, at github.com/GAIR-NLP/O1-Journey.
  • Planned next steps include:
    • a third round of long-thought data synthesis,
    • studies of long-thought scaling laws,
    • fine-grained evaluation focused on thought quality,
    • human-AI collaboration for producing thought data,
    • more work with RL, DPO and multi-agent setups.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

📚 Shelves 4The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Computer Science · 18,614 worksArtificial Intelligence · 17,965 worksArts and Humanities · 17,450 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 17,296 works

🧭 Topics 1Research subjects and languages the work is about.Reasoning · 1,685 works

Cite

Cite as Yiwei Qin, Xuefeng Li, Haoyang Zou, Yixiu Liu, Shijie Xia, Zhen Huang, Yixin Ye, Weizhe Yuan, Hector Liu, Yuanzhi Li and Pengfei Liu. 2024. O1 Replication Journey: A Strategic Progress Report — Part 1. arXiv:2410.18982.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2410.18982 · arXiv 2410.18982

@misc{qin2024o1,
  title = {{O1 Replication Journey: A Strategic Progress Report — Part 1}},
  author = {Yiwei Qin, Xuefeng Li, Haoyang Zou, Yixiu Liu, Shijie Xia, Zhen Huang, Yixin Ye, Weizhe Yuan, Hector Liu, Yuanzhi Li and Pengfei Liu},
  year = {2024},
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2410.18982},
  eprint = {2410.18982},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2410.18982}
}

References

51 references, 30 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter,… — Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
  2. Murray Campbell, A.Joseph Hoane, and Feng hsiung Hsu. 2002. Deep blue. Artificial Intelligence, 134(1):57– 83. find
  3. Guoxin Chen, Minpeng Liao, Chengxi Li, and Kai Fan. 2024. Alphamath almost zero: process supervision without process. ArXiv preprint, abs/2405.03553.
  4. Ethan Chern, Haoyang Zou, Xuefeng Li, Jiewen Hu, Kehua Feng, Junlong Li, and Pengfei Liu. 2023. Generative ai for math: Abel. https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/abel. ↗
  5. Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, Kensen Shi, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Joshua Maynez, Abhishek Rao, Parker Barnes, Yi Tay, Noam Shazeer, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Emi… — PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways
  6. Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. 2021. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. ArXiv, abs/2110.14168.
  7. Yuntian Deng, Kiran Prasad, Roland Fernandez, Paul Smolensky, Vishrav Chaudhary, and Stuart Shieber. 2023. Implicit chain of thought reasoning via knowledge distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01460. find
  8. Elvis Dohmatob, Yunzhen Feng, Pu Yang, Francois Charton, and Julia Kempe. 2024. A tale of tails: Model collapse as a change of scaling laws. find
  9. Guhao Feng, Bohang Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Haotian Ye, Di He, and Liwei Wang. 2024. Towards revealing the mystery behind chain of thought: a theoretical perspective. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36. find
  10. Matthias Gerstgrasser, Rylan Schaeffer, Apratim Dey, Rafael Rafailov, Henry Sleight, John Hughes, Tomasz Korbak, Rajashree Agrawal, Dhruv Pai, Andrey Gromov, Daniel A. Roberts, Diyi Yang, David L. Donoho, and Sanmi Koyejo. 2024. Is model collapse inevitable? breaking the curse of recursion by accumu… find
  11. Shibo Hao, Yi Gu, Haotian Luo, Tianyang Liu, Xiyan Shao, Xinyuan Wang, Shuhua Xie, Haodi Ma, Adithya Samavedhi, Qiyue Gao, et al. 2024. Llm reasoners: New evaluation, library, and analysis of step-by-step reasoning with large language models. ArXiv preprint, abs/2404.05221. — [arXiv:2404.05221](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05221) find
  12. Jiaxin Huang, Shixiang Shane Gu, Le Hou, Yuexin Wu, Xuezhi Wang, Hongkun Yu, and Jiawei Han. 2022. Large language models can self-improve. ArXiv, abs/2210.11610.
  13. Zhen Huang, Zengzhi Wang, Shijie Xia, Xuefeng Li, Haoyang Zou, Ruijie Xu, Run-Ze Fan, Lyumanshan Ye, Ethan Chern, Yixin Ye, Yikai Zhang, Yuqing Yang, Ting Wu, Binjie Wang, Shichao Sun, Yang Xiao, Yiyuan Li, Fan Zhou, Steffi Chern, Yiwei Qin, Yan Ma, Jiadi Su, Yixiu Liu, Yuxiang Zheng, Shaoting Zhang… — OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI
  14. Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Scaling laws for neural language models.
  15. Xian Li, Ping Yu, Chunting Zhou, Timo Schick, Omer Levy, Luke Zettlemoyer, Jason Weston, and Mike Lewis. 2024a. Self-alignment with instruction backtranslation. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net.
  16. Zhiyuan Li, Hong Liu, Denny Zhou, and Tengyu Ma. 2024b. Chain of thought empowers transformers to solve inherently serial problems. ArXiv preprint, abs/2402.12875. find
  17. Hunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards, Bowen Baker, Teddy Lee, Jan Leike, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, and Karl Cobbe. 2024. Let’s verify step by step. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenRevi…
  18. Liangchen Luo, Yinxiao Liu, Rosanne Liu, Samrat Phatale, Harsh Lara, Yunxuan Li, Lei Shu, Yun Zhu, Lei Meng, Jiao Sun, et al. 2024. Improve mathematical reasoning in language models by automated process supervision. ArXiv preprint, abs/2406.06592.
  19. Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, Shashank Gupta, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Katherine Hermann, Sean Welleck, Amir Yazdanbakhsh, and Peter Clark. 2023. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with… find
  20. Ning Miao, Yee Whye Teh, and Tom Rainforth. 2023. Selfcheck: Using llms to zero-shot check their own step-by-step reasoning. ArXiv, abs/2308.00436.
  21. Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Weizhe Yuan, Kyunghyun Cho, He He, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, and Jason Weston. 2024. Iterative reasoning preference optimization. CoRR, abs/2404.19733.
  22. Yuxiao Qu, Tianjun Zhang, Naman Garg, and Aviral Kumar. 2024. Recursive introspection: Teaching language model agents how to self-improve. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.18219.
  23. Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D Manning, Stefano Ermon, and Chelsea Finn. 2024. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
  24. Anian Ruoss, Grégoire Delétang, Sourabh Medapati, Jordi Grau-Moya, Li Kevin Wenliang, Elliot Catt, John Reid, and Tim Genewein. 2024. Grandmaster-level chess without search. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04494. find
  25. Nikhil Sardana and Jonathan Frankle. 2023. Beyond chinchilla-optimal: Accounting for inference in language model scaling laws. ArXiv, abs/2401.00448.
  26. Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Mingchuan Zhang, YK Li, Yu Wu, and Daya Guo. 2024. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300.
  27. Ilia Shumailov, Zakhar Shumaylov, Yiren Zhao, Yarin Gal, Nicolas Papernot, and Ross Anderson. 2024. The curse of recursion: Training on generated data makes models forget.
  28. David Silver, Aja Huang, Chris J Maddison, Arthur Guez, Laurent Sifre, George Van Den Driessche, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Veda Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, et al. 2016. Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. nature, 529(7587):484–489. find
  29. David Silver, Thomas Hubert, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Matthew Lai, Arthur Guez, Marc Lanctot, Laurent Sifre, Dharshan Kumaran, Thore Graepel, et al. 2017. Mastering chess and shogi by self-play with a general reinforcement learning algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.01815.
  30. Charlie Snell, Jaehoon Lee, Kelvin Xu, and Aviral Kumar. 2024. Scaling llm test-time compute optimally can be more effective than scaling model parameters. ArXiv, abs/2408.03314.
  31. Zhiqing Sun, Longhui Yu, Yikang Shen, Weiyang Liu, Yiming Yang, Sean Welleck, and Chuang Gan. 2024. Easy-to-hard generalization: Scalable alignment beyond human supervision. ArXiv preprint, abs/2403.09472. find
  32. Jonathan Uesato, Nate Kushman, Ramana Kumar, Francis Song, Noah Siegel, Lisa Wang, Antonia Creswell, Geoffrey Irving, and Irina Higgins. 2022. Solving math word problems with process-and outcome-based feedback. ArXiv preprint, abs/2211.14275.
  33. Chaojie Wang, Yanchen Deng, Zhiyi Lv, Shuicheng Yan, and An Bo. 2024a. Q*: Improving multi-step reasoning for llms with deliberative planning. ArXiv preprint, abs/2406.14283.
  34. Peiyi Wang, Lei Li, Zhihong Shao, R. X. Xu, Damai Dai, Yifei Li, Deli Chen, Y. Wu, and Zhifang Sui. 2024b. Math-shepherd: Verify and reinforce llms step-by-step without human annotations.
  35. Peiyi Wang, Lei Li, Zhihong Shao, Runxin Xu, Damai Dai, Yifei Li, Deli Chen, Yu Wu, and Zhifang Sui. 2024c. Math-shepherd: Verify and reinforce llms step-by-step without human annotations. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Pape…
  36. Tianlu Wang, Ilia Kulikov, Olga Golovneva, Ping Yu, Weizhe Yuan, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Jason Weston, and Xian Li. 2024d. Self-taught evaluators.
  37. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. 2022. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24824–24837.
  38. Tianhao Wu, Weizhe Yuan, Olga Golovneva, Jing Xu, Yuandong Tian, Jiantao Jiao, Jason Weston, and Sainbayar Sukhbaatar. 2024a. Meta-rewarding language models: Self-improving alignment with llm-as-a-meta-judge. CoRR, abs/2407.19594.
  39. Ting Wu, Xuefeng Li, and Pengfei Liu. 2024b. Progress or regress? self-improvement reversal in post-training. CoRR, abs/2407.05013.
  40. Shijie Xia, Xuefeng Li, Yixin Liu, Tongshuang Wu, and Pengfei Liu. 2024. Evaluating mathematical reasoning beyond accuracy. ArXiv preprint, abs/2404.05692.
  41. Jing Xu, Andrew Lee, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, and Jason Weston. 2024. Some things are more cringe than others: Iterative preference optimization with the pairwise cringe loss. find
  42. Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Thomas L. Griffiths, Yuan Cao, and Karthik Narasimhan. 2023. Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models. find
  43. Tian Ye, Zicheng Xu, Yuanzhi Li, and Zeyuan Allen-Zhu. 2024. Physics of language models: Part 2.2, how to learn from mistakes on grade-school math problems. find
  44. Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jing Xu, and Jason Weston. 2024. Self-rewarding language models. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net. find
  45. Eric Zelikman, Georges Harik, Yijia Shao, Varuna Jayasiri, Nick Haber, and Noah D Goodman. 2024a. Quiet-star: Language models can teach themselves to think before speaking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.09629.
  46. Eric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, and Noah Goodman. 2022. Star: Bootstrapping reasoning with reasoning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:15476–15488.
  47. Eric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, and Noah D. Goodman. 2024b. Star: self-taught reasoner bootstrapping reasoning with reasoning. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS ’22, Red Hook, NY, USA. Curran Associates Inc. find
  48. Zhongshen Zeng, Pengguang Chen, Shu Liu, Haiyun Jiang, and Jiaya Jia. 2023. Mr-gsm8k: A meta-reasoning benchmark for large language model evaluation. CoRR, abs/2312.17080. find
  49. Zhihan Zhang, Zhenwen Liang, Wenhao Yu, Dian Yu, Mengzhao Jia, Dong Yu, and Meng Jiang. 2024. Learn beyond the answer: Training language models with reflection for mathematical reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12050. find
  50. Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric P. Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2023. Judging llm-asa-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: An… find
  51. Daniel M. Ziegler, Nisan Stiennon, Jeffrey Wu, Tom B. Brown, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, Paul F. Christiano, and Geoffrey Irving. 2019. Fine-tuning language models from human preferences. CoRR, abs/1909.08593. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/qin-2024-o1-replication-journey-strategic-progress/