🔗 Who cites «Lost in Literalism: How Supervised Training Shapes Translationese in LLMs»

10 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 5 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Lost in Literalism: How Supervised Training Shapes Translationese in LLMs»

1. Pushing on Multilingual Reasoning Models with Language-Mixed Chain-of-ThoughtarXiv:2510.04230Guijin Son, Donghun Yang, Hitesh Laxmichand Patel, et al.2025 · 7 citations
2. BlAInded by Fluency: How Idiomatic Machine Translation Outputs Affect Student Post-Editors' Edit TypesAnnual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT)Valentin Scourneau, Loïc De Faria Pires2026
3. Lexical and Syntactic Diversity: Still Lost in Machine Translation?Workshop on Style in GenAI-Translated Content (StyGenAI)Lise Volkart, Pierrette Bouillon2026
4. Lost in Translation, and Found: Detecting and Interpreting Translation EffectsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Shira Wein, Anna Serbina, Jiyuan Ji, et al.2026
5. Reasoning About Gender: How Source Text Strategies Impact Italian–to-German Machine Translation Beyond the BinaryWorkshop on Gender-Inclusive Translation TechnologiesPaolo Di Natale, Laura Schlutter, Elena Chiocchetti, et al.2026

5 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/li-2025-lost-literalism-how-supervised-training/cited-by/