Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not… / cited by

Who cites «Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful»

47 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 19 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful»

  1. Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They ThinkarXiv:2505.05410Yanda Chen, Joe Benton, Ansh Radhakrishnan, et al.2025 · 106 citations
  2. Phi-4-reasoning Technical ReportarXiv:2504.21318Marah Abdin, Sahaj Agarwal, Ahmed Awadallah, et al.2025 · 64 citations
  3. Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMsarXiv:2506.14245Xumeng Wen, Zihan Liu, Shun Zheng, et al.2025 · 62 citations
  4. A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Reasoning Models: Language, Multimodality, and BeyondarXiv:2503.21614Xiaoye Qu, Yafu Li, Zhao-Chen Su, et al.2025 · 55 citations
  5. Thought Anchors: Which LLM Reasoning Steps Matter?arXiv:2506.19143Paul C. Bogdan, Uzay Macar, Neel Nanda, et al.2025 · 44 citations
  6. A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical ReasoningACM Computing SurveysPeng-Yuan Wang, Tian-Shuo Liu, Chenyang Wang, et al.2025 · 26 citations
  7. Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language ModelsarXiv:2510.25741Rui-Jie Zhu, Zixuan Wang, Kai Hua, et al.2025 · 22 citations

28 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/arcuschin-2025-chain-thought-reasoning-wild-always/cited-by/