Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / authors / Ryan Liu / cited by

Who cites Ryan Liu

67 citations of their works from 67 papers of our library (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 34 with a page here, the most cited first · ← Ryan Liu

  1. A Survey of Large Language ModelsFrontiers of Computer ScienceWayne Xin Zhao, Kun Zhou, Junyi Li, et al.2023 · 2,875 citations
  2. Challenges and Applications of Large Language ModelsarXiv:2307.10169Jean Kaddour, Joshua Harris, Maximilian Mozes, et al.2023 · 301 citations
  3. Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer ReviewsarXiv:2403.07183Weixin Liang, Zachary Izzo, Yaohui Zhang, et al.2024 · 119 citations
  4. Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific PapersarXiv:2404.01268Weixin Liang, Yaohui Zhang, Zhengxuan Wu, et al.2024 · 89 citations
  5. MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific PapersarXiv:2401.04259Mike D'Arcy, Tom Hope, Larry Birnbaum, et al.2024 · 76 citations
  6. CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated ReviewarXiv:2411.00816Yixuan Weng, Minjun Zhu, Guangsheng Bao, et al.2024 · 65 citations
  7. LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific ResearcharXiv:2501.04306Ziming Luo, Zonglin Yang, Zexin Xu, et al.2025 · 39 citations
  8. Are We There Yet? Revealing the Risks of Utilizing Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer ReviewarXiv:2412.01708Rui Ye, Xianghe Pang, Jingyi Chai, et al.2024 · 35 citations
  9. AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic ReviewsarXiv:2408.10365Keith Tyser, Ben Segev, Gaston Longhitano, et al.2024 · 34 citations
  10. What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?arXiv:2405.06563Ilia Kuznetsov, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Koen Dercksen, et al.2024 · 33 citations
  11. Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other ExperimentsPLoS ONEAlexander Goldberg, Ivan Stelmakh, Kyunghyun Cho, et al.2023 · 32 citations
  12. Reviewer2: Optimizing Review Generation Through Prompt GenerationarXiv:2402.10886Zhaolin Gao, Kiante Brantley, Thorsten Joachims2024 · 27 citations
  13. Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025arXiv:2504.09737Nitya Thakkar, Mert Yuksekgonul, Jake Silberg, et al.2025 · 21 citations
  14. Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer RewardsarXiv:2505.04966Jaeho Kim, Yunseok Lee, Seulki Lee2025 · 13 citations
  15. The More You Automate, the Less You See: Hidden Pitfalls of AI Scientist SystemsarXiv:2509.08713Ziming Luo, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Nihar B. Shah2025 · 11 citations
  16. Reproducibility in Machine Learning-Driven ResearcharXiv:2307.10320Harald Semmelrock, Simone Kopeinik, Dieter Theiler, et al.2023 · 11 citations
  17. Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 ExperimentarXiv:2411.03417Alexander Goldberg, Ihsan Ullah, Thanh Gia Hieu Khuong, et al.2024 · 10 citations
  18. REMOR: Automated Peer Review Generation with LLM Reasoning and Multi-Objective Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2505.11718Pawin Taechoyotin, Daniel Acuna2025 · 8 citations
  19. Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic EvaluationarXiv:2505.23824Tianmai M. Zhang, Neil F. Abernethy2025 · 7 citations
  20. Are Large Language Models Reliable AI Scientists? Assessing Reverse-Engineering of Black-Box SystemsarXiv:2505.17968Jiayi Geng, Howard Chen, Dilip Arumugam, et al.2025 · 4 citations
  21. "Give a Positive Review Only": An Early Investigation Into In-Paper Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for AI ReviewersarXiv:2511.01287Qin Zhou, Zhexin Zhang, Zhi Li, et al.2025 · 2 citations

33 more citing papers of our library have no page here yet.

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/ryan-liu/cited-by/