Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / authors / Karthik Valmeekam

Karthik Valmeekam

Karthik Valmeekam has 4 papers in our library, in 2022–2024, most of them on Language models & pretraining, Evaluation & benchmarks, Reasoning; often with Subbarao Kambhampati, Sarath Sreedharan, Lin Guan.

4 papers in our library · 2022–2024

OpenAlex · h-index 8 · 21 works · 302 citations OpenAlex, 2026-10-14

📄 4 works in our library · 🔗 Cited 443 times in our library · 1 more in our library without a page yet · ⭐ Paper Stars ranking: #3765

The profile is the library's match of the name; two people with one name are not always told apart.

Elsewhere: Google Scholar · Semantic Scholar · dblp · ACL Anthology

 Affiliations

From the bylines of their papers (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14), ORCID and Wikidata; institutions on papers are matched by machine.

 Fields, topics and concepts

Of its works in our library, with the number of works on each.

 Works by year

2020s

 Papers

The most cited first (OpenAlex and our library).

  1. PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Change (2022 · 222 citations)
    Claims that large language models can plan often rest on commonsense tasks, where a correct answer may come from memorized world knowledge rather than actual reasoning.
  2. On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigation (2023 · 191 citations)
    This NeurIPS 2023 study asks whether large language models can plan, given claims that web-trained LLMs show emergent reasoning.
  3. Leveraging Pre-trained Large Language Models to Construct and Utilize World Models for Model-based Task Planning (2023 · 115 citations)
    The paper argues that LLMs should not act as planners themselves. Instead, they should build the world model that a classical planner then uses. The authors give GPT-4 a list of actions with short natural-language descriptions and have it write PDDL action models, meaning predicates, preconditions and effects. Early…
  4. LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks (2024 · 88 citations)
    This position paper responds to two opposing errors in the debate on LLMs and planning. One overstates their reasoning ability. The other treats them as mere text-to-symbol converters for classical solvers. The authors review evidence, much of it from their own group, that autoregressive LLMs cannot reliably produce…

All works

5 works of theirs in our library, the most cited first; 4 with a page here, the others link their original until we summarise them.

  1. LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo FrameworksarXiv:2402.01817 · Proceedings of the 41 st International Conference on Machine Learning, Vienna, Austria. PMLR 235, 2024Subbarao Kambhampati, Karthik Valmeekam, Lin Guan, et al.2024 · 88 citations
  2. On the Self-Verification Limitations of Large Language Models on Reasoning and Planning Tasks ↗arXiv:2402.08115 · no summary yetKaya Stechly, Karthik Valmeekam, Subbarao Kambhampati2024 · 42 citations

 Co-authors here

4 co-authors with a page, the most papers together first.

Venues

Where their works here were published, the most works first, with the editions of those that have a page.

 Cited by

Papers of our library cite their works 443 times (of the 149,439 papers whose bibliographies we read); 79 citing papers with a page here →.

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/karthik-valmeekam/