Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2025 / Position: LLMs Can be Good Tutors in English Education

Position: LLMs Can be Good Tutors in English Education

Paper · 2025 · Jingheng Ye, Shen Wang, Deqing Zou et al.

Summary

This is a position paper. It runs no experiments and introduces no dataset. The authors argue that current LLM uses in English teaching mostly reuse standard NLP task framings and ignore educational methodology. They contend that LLMs can work as tutors that support human teachers rather than replace them. They organise the field around three roles. As data enhancers, LLMs create, reform and annotate learning materials and simulate students. As task predictors, they assess learners and plan learning paths. As agents, they deliver personalised and inclusive instruction. The paper relates these roles to the four core skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing). It places them in a four-stage history of AI for language education and draws on four disciplines: computer science, linguistics, education and psycholinguistics. It closes with three open challenges: hallucination, bias and privacy, and pedagogical alignment. The contribution is a conceptual map and research agenda. It matters because language is described as an ill-defined domain that has received less tutoring-system attention than maths or science.

Key points

  • The paper proposes a three-role taxonomy (data enhancers, task predictors, agents), with a literature overview in Appendix A and future directions in Appendix B.
  • It describes four generations of educational language technology:
    • rule-based (1960s–1990s; PLATO, Systran);
    • statistical (1990s–2010s; early Google Translate, Dragon NaturallySpeaking);
    • neural (2010s–2020s; Grammarly, Duolingo);
    • LLMs (2020s onward; ChatGPT, Khanmigo).
  • It cites the evaluation taxonomy of Maurya et al. (2024), which has eight dimensions for AI tutors. These fall into two groups: problem-solving ability and pedagogical alignment (adapting to proficiency, scaffolded feedback, engagement, motivation).
  • Generated questions can be answer-aware, where the target answer is fixed, or answer-agnostic, where the answer is open.
  • The authors list three limitations of their own position:
    • it emphasises potential over deployment barriers;
    • it does not analyse how the roles vary across learner groups, languages and cultures;
    • it gives only shallow treatment of how learners, tutors, teachers and parents interact.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Separating generated exercises into ones with a fixed target answer and open-ended ones lets each type get its own checking procedure; this split is useful wherever items are produced automatically.
  • I2. An LLM can play the learner, so that materials and tutoring strategies are tried out on simulated students before real ones see them. This is a cheap way to probe a system with realistic varied inputs.
  • I3. Evaluate a tutor on two separate axes: whether it solves the task, and whether its help is pedagogically sound. Grading only correctness hides poor explanations.
  • I4. Anchor LLM output to structured domain knowledge and explicit rules, then add automatic plus human-in-the-loop validation to curb hallucinations.
  • I5. The authors frame learner language as an ill-defined domain where high variability makes automatic analysis unreliable. This is a reminder that systems tuned on clean text may break on non-native input.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (answer): Fixed-answer test items could be generated straight from the world graph, so the gold answer is known by construction. Open items could be routed to a separate, softer grading path.
  • I2 (learn): Simulated student-style texts, including learner errors, could serve as stress tests and self-play opponents for the parser and readers.
  • I3 (answer): Readers answering school tests could be scored both on answer accuracy and on whether the explanation trace is understandable and pitched at the right level.
  • I4 (learn): LLM teacher tiers could have their labels checked against compiled knowledge (VerbNet classes, WordNet ontology) before entering silver data, with disagreements sent for human review.
  • I5 (tree): Learner-written sentences could be added to evaluation as a separate slice, to measure how LAS and frame extraction degrade on non-standard English.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Jingheng Ye, Shen Wang, Deqing Zou, Yibo Yan, Kun Wang, Hai-Tao Zheng, Ruitong Liu, Zenglin Xu, Irwin King, Philip S. Yu and Qingsong Wen. 2025. Position: LLMs Can be Good Tutors in English Education. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.885

@inproceedings{ye2025position,
  title = {{Position: LLMs Can be Good Tutors in English Education}},
  author = {Jingheng Ye, Shen Wang, Deqing Zou, Yibo Yan, Kun Wang, Hai-Tao Zheng, Ruitong Liu, Zenglin Xu, Irwin King, Philip S. Yu and Qingsong Wen},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.885},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.885}
}

References

187 references, 30 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Hasan Abu-Rasheed, Christian Weber, and Madjid Fathi. 2024. Knowledge graphs as context sources for llm-based explanations of learning recommendations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03008. ↗
  2. Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, and 1 others. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774. ↗
  3. Muhammad Farid Adilazuarda, Sagnik Mukherjee, Pradhyumna Lavania, Siddhant Shivdutt Singh, Alham Fikri Aji, Jacki O’Neill, Ashutosh Modi, and Monojit Choudhury. 2024. Towards measuring and modeling “culture” in LLMs: A survey. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 15763–15784, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  4. Janice Ahn, Rishu Verma, Renze Lou, Di Liu, Rui Zhang, and Wenpeng Yin. 2024. Large language models for mathematical reasoning: Progresses and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00157. ↗
  5. Suha S Al-Thanyyan and Aqil M Azmi. 2021. Automated text simplification: a survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(2):1–36. find
  6. Bashar Alhafni, Sowmya Vajjala, Stefano Bannò, Kaushal Kumar Maurya, and Ekaterina Kochmar. 2024. Llms in education: Novel perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11917. ↗
  7. Eman Alhusaiyan. 2024. A systematic review of current trends in artificial intelligence in foreign language learning. Saudi Journal of Language Studies. ↗
  8. Eman Alhusaiyan. 2025. A systematic review of current trends in artificial intelligence in foreign language learning. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 5(1):1– 16. ↗
  9. Badr AlKhamissi, Muhammad ElNokrashy, Mai Alkhamissi, and Mona Diab. 2024. Investigating cultural alignment of large language models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 12404–12422, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  10. Preeti Anand. 2023. Khan academy creates gpt-4 based helper khanmigo marking formal entry of ai into education. find
  11. Ekaterina Artemova, Akim Tsvigun, Dominik Schlechtweg, Natalia Fedorova, Sergei Tilga, and Boris Obmoroshev. 2024. Hands-on tutorial: Labeling with llm and human-in-the-loop. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04637. ↗
  12. Sumit Asthana, Hannah Rashkin, Elizabeth Clark, Fantine Huot, and Mirella Lapata. 2024. Evaluating LLMs for targeted concept simplification for domain-specific texts. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6208–6226, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  13. Savita Bhat and Vasudeva Varma. 2023. Large language models as annotators: A preliminary evaluation for annotating low-resource language content. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison of NLP Systems, pages 100–107, Bali, Indonesia. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  14. Christopher Blair. 1997. Dragon–naturallyspeaking. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 97(12):711–711. find
  15. Benjamin S Bloom, Max D Engelhart, Edward J Furst, Walker H Hill, David R Krathwohl, and 1 others. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. Longman New York. find
  16. Angana Borah and Rada Mihalcea. 2024. Towards implicit bias detection and mitigation in multi-agent llm interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02584. ↗
  17. Beatriz Borges, Niket Tandon, Tanja Käser, and Antoine Bosselut. 2024. Let me teach you: Pedagogical foundations of feedback for language models. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 12082–12104, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  18. Christopher Bryant, Zheng Yuan, Muhammad Reza Qorib, Hannan Cao, Hwee Tou Ng, and Ted Briscoe. 2023. Grammatical error correction: A survey of the state of the art. Computational Linguistics, 49(3):643–701. ↗
  19. M Byram. 1989. Cultural studies in foreign language education. Multilingual Matters, 61. ↗
  20. Michael Byram. 2008. From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections, volume 17. Multilingual matters. find
  21. Marios C Angelides and Isabel Garcia. 1993. Towards an intelligent knowledge based tutoring system for foreign language learning. Journal of computing and information technology, 1(1):15–28. find
  22. Andrew Caines, Luca Benedetto, Shiva Taslimipoor, Christopher Davis, Yuan Gao, Oeistein Andersen, Zheng Yuan, Mark Elliott, Russell Moore, Christopher Bryant, and 1 others. 2023. On the application of large language models for language teaching and assessment technology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08393. ↗
  23. John B Carroll. 1965. The contributions of psychological theory and educational research to the teaching of foreign languages. The modern language journal, 49(5):273–281. ↗
  24. Yulin Chen, Ning Ding, Hai-Tao Zheng, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, and Bowen Zhou. 2024. Empowering private tutoring by chaining large language models. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 354–364. find
  25. Olga Cherednichenko, Olha Yanholenko, Antonina Badan, Nataliia Onishchenko, and Nunu Akopiants. 2024. Large language models for foreign language acquisition. find
  26. Cheng-Han Chiang, Wei-Chih Chen, Chun-Yi Kuan, Chienchou Yang, and Hung-yi Lee. 2024. Large language model as an assignment evaluator: Insights, feedback, and challenges in a 1000+ student course. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2489–2513, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  27. Yongwan Cho, Rabia Emhamed AlMamlook, and Tasnim Gharaibeh. 2024. A systematic review of knowledge tracing and large language models in education: Opportunities, issues, and future research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09248. ↗
  28. Keith Cochran, Clayton Cohn, Nicole Hutchins, Gautam Biswas, and Peter Hastings. 2022. Improving automated evaluation of formative assessments with text data augmentation. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 390–401. Springer. find
  29. Keith Cochran, Clayton Cohn, Jean Francois Rouet, and Peter Hastings. 2023. Improving automated evaluation of student text responses using gpt-3.5 for text data augmentation. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 217–228. Springer. find
  30. Zhuyun Dai, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Vincent Y Zhao, Aida Amini, Qazi Mamunur Rashid, Mike Green, and Kelvin Guu. 2022. Dialog inpainting: Turning documents into dialogs. In International conference on machine learning, pages 4558–4586. PMLR. ↗
  31. Stephanie L. Day, Jacapo Cirica, Steven R. Clapp, Veronika Penkova, Amy E. Giroux, Abbey Banta, Catherine Bordeau, Poojitha Mutteneni, and Ben D. Sawyer. 2025. Evaluating genai for simplifying texts for education: Improving accuracy and consistency for enhanced readability. Preprint, arXiv:2501.09158. ↗
  32. Bosheng Ding, Chengwei Qin, Ruochen Zhao, Tianze Luo, Xinze Li, Guizhen Chen, Wenhan Xia, Junjie Hu, Anh Tuan Luu, and Shafiq Joty. 2024. Data augmentation using LLMs: Data perspectives, learning paradigms and challenges. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 1679–1705, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  33. Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Tianyu Liu, and 1 others. 2022. A survey on in-context learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00234. ↗
  34. Sarah Elaine Eaton. 2010. Global Trends in Language Learning in the 21st Century. ERIC. find
  35. Ronald G Ehrenberg, Dominic J Brewer, Adam Gamoran, and J Douglas Willms. 2001. Class size and student achievement. Psychological science in the public interest, 2(1):1–30. ↗
  36. Vacide Erdoğan. 2005. Contribution of error analysis to foreign language teaching. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2). find
  37. Haoxiang Fan, Guanzheng Chen, Xingbo Wang, and Zhenhui Peng. 2024. Lessonplanner: Assisting novice teachers to prepare pedagogy-driven lesson plans with large language models. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 1–20. find
  38. Tao Fang, Shu Yang, Kaixin Lan, Derek F Wong, Jinpeng Hu, Lidia S Chao, and Yue Zhang. 2023. Is chatgpt a highly fluent grammatical error correction system? a comprehensive evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01746. ↗
  39. Lucile Favero, Juan Antonio Pérez-Ortiz, Tanja Käser, and Nuria Oliver. 2024. Enhancing critical thinking in education by means of a socratic chatbot. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05511. ↗
  40. Yuejiao Fei, Leyang Cui, Sen Yang, Wai Lam, Zhenzhong Lan, and Shuming Shi. 2023. Enhancing grammatical error correction systems with explanations. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 7489–7501, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  41. Steven Y. Feng, Varun Gangal, Jason Wei, Sarath Chandar, Soroush Vosoughi, Teruko Mitamura, and Eduard Hovy. 2021. A survey of data augmentation approaches for NLP. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, pages 968–988, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  42. Tira Nur Fitria. 2021. Grammarly as ai-powered english writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing english. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1):65–78. ↗
  43. Nils Freyer, Hendrik Kempt, and Lars Klöser. 2024. Easy-read and large language models: on the ethical dimensions of llm-based text simplification. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(3):50. ↗
  44. Kaiqi Fu, Linkai Peng, Nan Yang, and Shuran Zhou. 2024. Pronunciation assessment with multimodal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09209. ↗
  45. Yang Gao, Qikai Wang, and Xiaochen Wang. 2024. Exploring efl university teachers’ beliefs in integrating chatgpt and other large language models in language education: a study in china. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1):29–44. ↗
  46. Yingming Gao, Baorian Nuchged, Ya Li, and Linkai Peng. 2023. An investigation of applying large language models to spoken language learning. Applied Sciences, 14(1):224. ↗
  47. Deepanway Ghosal, Navonil Majumder, Ambuj Mehrish, and Soujanya Poria. 2023. Text-to-audio generation using instruction-tuned llm and latent diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13731. ↗
  48. Crina Grosan, Ajith Abraham, Crina Grosan, and Ajith Abraham. 2011. Rule-based expert systems. Intelligent systems: A modern approach, pages 149–185. ↗
  49. Jiawei Gu, Xuhui Jiang, Zhichao Shi, Hexiang Tan, Xuehao Zhai, Chengjin Xu, Wei Li, Yinghan Shen, Shengjie Ma, Honghao Liu, and 1 others. 2024. A survey on llm-as-a-judge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15594. ↗
  50. Jieun Han, Haneul Yoo, Yoonsu Kim, Junho Myung, Minsun Kim, Hyunseung Lim, Juho Kim, Tak Yeon Lee, Hwajung Hong, So-Yeon Ahn, and 1 others. 2023a. Recipe: How to integrate chatgpt into efl writing education. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM conference on learning@ scale, pages 416–420. find
  51. Jieun Han, Haneul Yoo, Junho Myung, Minsun Kim, Hyunseung Lim, Yoonsu Kim, Tak Yeon Lee, Hwajung Hong, Juho Kim, So-Yeon Ahn, and Alice Oh. 2024. LLM-as-a-tutor in EFL writing education: Focusing on evaluation of student-LLM interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Customizable NLP: Progress and Challenges in Customizing NLP for a Domain, Application, Group, or Individual (CustomNLP4U), pages 284–293, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  52. Jieun Han, Haneul Yoo, Junho Myung, Minsun Kim, Hyunseung Lim, Yoonsu Kim, Tak Yeon Lee, Hwajung Hong, Juho Kim, So-Yeon Ahn, and 1 others. 2023b. Fabric: Automated scoring and feedback generation for essays. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05191. ↗
  53. Robert Hart. 1981. Language study and the plato system. Studies in language learning, 3(1):1–24. find
  54. Lin He and Keqin Li. 2024. Mitigating hallucinations in llm using k-means clustering of synonym semantic relevance. Authorea Preprints. ↗
  55. Owen Henkel, Libby Hills, Adam Boxer, Bill Roberts, and Zach Levonian. 2024. Can large language models make the grade? an empirical study evaluating llms ability to mark short answer questions in k-12 education. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pages 300–304. find
  56. Huu-Tuong Ho, Duc-Tin Ly, and Luong Vuong Nguyen. 2024. Mitigating hallucinations in large language models for educational application. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Asia (ICCE-Asia), pages 1–4. IEEE. find
  57. Yanxia Hou. 2020. Foreign language education in the era of artificial intelligence. In Big Data Analytics for Cyber-Physical System in Smart City: BDCPS 2019, 28-29 December 2019, Shenyang, China, pages 937–944. Springer. find
  58. Bihao Hu, Longwei Zheng, Jiayi Zhu, Lishan Ding, Yilei Wang, and Xiaoqing Gu. 2024. Teaching plan generation and evaluation with gpt-4: Unleashing the potential of llm in instructional design. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. ↗
  59. Silan Hu and Xiaoning Wang. 2024. Foke: A personalized and explainable education framework integrating foundation models, knowledge graphs, and prompt engineering. In China National Conference on Big Data and Social Computing, pages 399–411. Springer. limitations of llm as annotator for low resource languages. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17637. ↗
  60. Carl James. 2013. Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Routledge. ↗
  61. Jaeho Jeon and Seongyong Lee. 2023. Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and chatgpt. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12):15873–15892. ↗
  62. Yuan-Hao Jiang, Ruijia Li, Yizhou Zhou, Changyong Qi, Hanglei Hu, Yuang Wei, Bo Jiang, and Yonghe Wu. 2024a. Ai agent for education: von neumann multi-agent system framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00083. ↗
  63. Zhuoxuan Jiang, Haoyuan Peng, Shanshan Feng, Fan Li, and Dongsheng Li. 2024b. Llms can find mathematical reasoning mistakes by pedagogical chain-of-thought. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.06705. ↗
  64. Heeseok Jung, Jaesang Yoo, Yohaan Yoon, and Yeonju Jang. 2024. Clst: Cold-start mitigation in knowledge tracing by aligning a generative language model as a students’ knowledge tracer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10296. ↗
  65. Chieh-Yang Huang, Jing Wei, and Ting-Hao Kenneth Huang. 2024a. Generating educational materials with different levels of readability using llms. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants, pages 16–22. find
  66. Ryo Kamoi, Sarkar Snigdha Sarathi Das, Renze Lou, Jihyun Janice Ahn, Yilun Zhao, Xiaoxin Lu, Nan Zhang, Yusen Zhang, Haoran Ranran Zhang, Sujeeth Reddy Vummanthala, Salika Dave, Shaobo Qin, Arman Cohan, Wenpeng Yin, and Rui Zhang. 2024. Evaluating LLMs at detecting errors in LLM responses. In First Conference on Language Modeling. ↗
  67. Lei Huang, Weijiang Yu, Weitao Ma, Weihong Zhong, Zhangyin Feng, Haotian Wang, Qianglong Chen, Weihua Peng, Xiaocheng Feng, Bing Qin, and 1 others. 2023. A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions. ACM Transactions on Information Systems.
  68. Fatih Karataş, Faramarz Yaşar Abedi, Filiz Ozek Gun-yel, Derya Karadeniz, and Yasemin Kuzgun. 2024. Incorporating ai in foreign language education: An investigation into chatgpt’s effect on foreign language learners. Education and Information Technologies, pages 1–24. ↗
  69. Xu Huang, Weiwen Liu, Xiaolong Chen, Xingmei Wang, Hao Wang, Defu Lian, Yasheng Wang, Ruiming Tang, and Enhong Chen. 2024b. Understanding the planning of llm agents: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02716. ↗
  70. Tanja Käser and Giora Alexandron. 2024. Simulated learners in educational technology: A systematic literature review and a turing-like test. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(2):545– 585. ↗
  71. Ken Hyland and Fiona Hyland. 2006. Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language teaching, 39(2):83–101. ↗
  72. Anisia Katinskaia. 2025. An overview of artificial intelligence in computer-assisted language learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02032. ↗
  73. Joseph Marvin Imperial, Gail Forey, and Harish Tayyar Madabushi. 2024. Standardize: Aligning language models with expert-defined standards for content generation. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1573–1594, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  74. Gloria Ashiya Katuka, Alexander Gain, and Yen-Yun Yu. 2024. Investigating automatic scoring and feedback using large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.00602. ↗
  75. Suramya Jadhav, Abhay Shanbhag, Amogh Thakurdesai, Ridhima Sinare, and Raviraj Joshi. 2024. find
  76. On Julia Kharchenko, Tanya Roosta, Aman Chadha, and Chirag Shah. 2024. How well do llms represent values across cultures? empirical analysis of llm responses based on hofstede cultural dimensions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14805. ↗
  77. Gangwoo Kim, Sungdong Kim, Kang Min Yoo, and Jaewoo Kang. 2022. Generating information-seeking conversations from unlabeled documents. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2362– 2378, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  78. Hannah Kim, Kushan Mitra, Rafael Li Chen, Sajjadur Rahman, and Dan Zhang. 2024. MEGAnno+: A human-LLM collaborative annotation system. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pages 168–176, St. Julians, Malta. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  79. HYEJI KIM, Jongyoul Park, Hyeongbae Jeon, Sidney S Fels, Samuel Dodson, and Kyoungwon Seo. 2025. Augmented educators and ai: Shaping the future of human-ai collaboration in learning. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–6. find
  80. Anindita Kundu and Denilson Barbosa. 2024. Are large language models good essay graders? arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13120. ↗
  81. Ghader Kurdi, Jared Leo, Bijan Parsia, Uli Sattler, and Salam Al-Emari. 2020. A systematic review of automatic question generation for educational purposes. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30:121–204. ↗
  82. Soonwoo Kwon, Sojung Kim, Minju Park, Seunghyun Lee, and Kyuseok Kim. 2024. BIPED: Pedagogically informed tutoring system for ESL education. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3389–3414, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  83. Jeongmin Lee, Jin-Xia Huang, Minsoo Cho, Yoon-Hyung Roh, Oh-Woog Kwon, and Yunkeun Lee. 2024a. Developing conversational intelligent tutoring for speaking skills in second language learning. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 131–148. Springer. find
  84. Minhwa Lee, Zae Myung Kim, Vivek Khetan, and Dongyeop Kang. 2024b. Human-ai collaborative taxonomy construction: A case study in profession-specific writing assistants. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants, pages 51–57. find
  85. Unggi Lee, Haewon Jung, Younghoon Jeon, Younghoon Sohn, Wonhee Hwang, Jewoong Moon, and Hyeoncheol Kim. 2024c. Few-shot is enough: exploring chatgpt prompt engineering method for automatic question generation in english education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9):11483–11515. ↗
  86. Donald J Leu Jr. 1982. Oral reading error analysis: A critical review of research and application. Reading Research Quarterly, pages 420–437. ↗
  87. Dawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi, Chengshuai Zhao, Zhen Tan, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Yuxuan Jiang, Canyu Chen, Tianhao Wu, and 1 others. 2024a. From generation to judgment: Opportunities and challenges of llm-as-a-judge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16594. ↗
  88. Haitao Li, Qian Dong, Junjie Chen, Huixue Su, Yujia Zhou, Qingyao Ai, Ziyi Ye, and Yiqun Liu. 2024b. Llms-as-judges: A comprehensive survey on llm-based evaluation methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05579. ↗
  89. Kunze Li and Yu Zhang. 2024. Planning first, question second: An LLM-guided method for controllable question generation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 4715–4729, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  90. Minzhi Li, Taiwei Shi, Caleb Ziems, Min-Yen Kan, Nancy Chen, Zhengyuan Liu, and Diyi Yang. 2023. CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-guided work allocation between human and large language models for data annotation. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1487–1505, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  91. Wenchao Li and Haitao Liu. 2024. Applying large language models for automated essay scoring for non-native japanese. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1):1–15. ↗
  92. Xiu Li, Aron Henriksson, Martin Duneld, Jalal Nouri, and Yongchao Wu. 2024c. Supporting teaching-to-the-curriculum by linking diagnostic tests to curriculum goals: Using textbook content as context for retrieval-augmented generation with large language models. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 118–132. Springer. find
  93. Xun Liang, Hanyu Wang, Yezhaohui Wang, Shichao Song, Jiawei Yang, Simin Niu, Jie Hu, Dan Liu, Shunyu Yao, Feiyu Xiong, and 1 others. 2024. Controllable text generation for large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12599. ↗
  94. Chen Cecilia Liu, Iryna Gurevych, and Anna Korhonen. 2024a. Culturally aware and adapted nlp: A taxonomy and a survey of the state of the art. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03930. ↗
  95. Jiayu Liu, Zhenya Huang, Tong Xiao, Jing Sha, Jinze Wu, Qi Liu, Shijin Wang, and Enhong Chen. 2024b. Socraticlm: Exploring socratic personalized teaching with large language models. In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. find
  96. Ruibo Liu, Jerry Wei, Fangyu Liu, Chenglei Si, Yanzhe Zhang, Jinmeng Rao, Steven Zheng, Daiyi Peng, Diyi Yang, Denny Zhou, and 1 others. 2024c. Best practices and lessons learned on synthetic data for language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07503. ↗
  97. Zhengyuan Liu, Stella Xin Yin, Geyu Lin, and Nancy F Chen. 2024d. Personality-aware student simulation for conversational intelligent tutoring systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06762. ↗
  98. Nikahat Mulla and Prachi Gharpure. 2023. Automatic question generation: a review of methodologies, datasets, evaluation metrics, and applications. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 12(1):1–32. ↗
  99. Zhexiong Liu, Diane Litman, Elaine Wang, Tianwen Li, Mason Gobat, Lindsay Clare Matsumura, and Richard Correnti. 2025. erevise+ rf: A writing evaluation system for assessing student essay revisions and providing formative feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00715. ↗
  100. Johanne Myles. 2002. Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. Tesl-ej, 6(2):1–20. find
  101. Lin Long, Rui Wang, Ruixuan Xiao, Junbo Zhao, Xiao Ding, Gang Chen, and Haobo Wang. 2024. On LLMs-driven synthetic data generation, curation, and evaluation: A survey. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 11065–11082, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  102. Mahjabin Nahar, Haeseung Seo, Eun-Ju Lee, Aiping Xiong, and Dongwon Lee. 2024. Fakes of varying shades: How warning affects human perception and engagement regarding LLM hallucinations. In First Conference on Language Modeling. ↗
  103. Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Richard Lee Davis, Adam Hazimeh, Bojan Lazarevski, Pierre Dillenbourg, and Tanja Käser. 2024. Towards modeling learner performance with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14661. ↗
  104. Qingyu Lu, Baopu Qiu, Liang Ding, Kanjian Zhang, Tom Kocmi, and Dacheng Tao. 2024. Error analysis prompting enables human-like translation evaluation in large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 8801–8816, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  105. Diane Nicholls, Andrew Caines, and Paula Buttery. 2024. The write & improve corpus 2024: Error-annotated and cefr-labelled essays by learners of english. ↗
  106. Xinyi Lu and Xu Wang. 2024. Generative students: Using llm-simulated student profiles to support question item evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.11591. ↗
  107. Franz Och. 2006. Statistical machine translation live. find
  108. Wenchao Ma and Wenjing Guo. 2019. Cognitive diagnosis models for multiple strategies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(2):370–392. ↗
  109. Jakub Macina, Nico Daheim, Ido Hakimi, Manu Kapur, Iryna Gurevych, and Mrinmaya Sachan. 2025. Mathtutorbench: A benchmark for measuring open-ended pedagogical capabilities of llm tutors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18940. ↗
  110. Bakheet Bayan Nayif Mashoor and ATH bin Abdullah. 2020. Error analysis of spoken english language among jordanian secondary school students. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(5):75– 82. find
  111. Kaushal Kumar Maurya, KV Srivatsa, Kseniia Petukhova, and Ekaterina Kochmar. 2024. Unifying ai tutor evaluation: An evaluation taxonomy for pedagogical ability assessment of llm-powered ai tutors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09416. ↗
  112. Atsushi Mizumoto and Masaki Eguchi. 2023. Exploring the potential of using an ai language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(2):100050. ↗
  113. Horia Modran, Ioana Corina Bogdan, Doru Ursut , iu, Cornel Samoila, and Paul Livius Modran. 2024. Llm intelligent agent tutoring in higher education courses using a rag approach. Preprints 2024, 2024070519. find
  114. David Nunan. 1989. Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge university press. find
  115. Sankalan Pal Chowdhury, Vilém Zouhar, and Mrinmaya Sachan. 2024. Autotutor meets large language models: A language model tutor with rich pedagogy and guardrails. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pages 5–15. find
  116. Richard Paul and Linda Elder. 2007. Critical thinking: The art of socratic questioning. Journal of developmental education, 31(1):36. find
  117. Andrew Radford, Martin Atkinson, David Britain, Harald Clahsen, and Andrew Spencer. 2009. Linguistics: an introduction. Cambridge University Press. find
  118. Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D Manning, Stefano Ermon, and Chelsea Finn. 2024. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36. ↗
  119. Oybek Rashov. 2024. Modern methods of teaching foreign languages. In International Scientific and Current Research Conferences, pages 158–164. find
  120. Manav Rathod, Tony Tu, and Katherine Stasaski. 2022. Educational multi-question generation for reading comprehension. In Proceedings of the 17th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2022), pages 216–223, Seattle, Washington. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  121. Mahefa Abel Razafinirina, William Germain Dimbisoa, and Thomas Mahatody. 2024. Pedagogical alignment of large language models (llm) for personalized learning: A survey, trends and challenges. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 16(4):448–480. ↗
  122. Vinay Samuel, Houda Aynaou, Arijit Chowdhury, Karthik Venkat Ramanan, and Aman Chadha. 2024. Can LLMs augment low-resource reading comprehension datasets? opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 4: Student Research Workshop), pages 307–317, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  123. Alexander Scarlatos and Andrew Lan. 2024. Exploring knowledge tracing in tutor-student dialogues. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16490. ↗
  124. Alexander Scarlatos, Naiming Liu, Jaewook Lee, Richard Baraniuk, and Andrew Lan. 2025. Training llm-based tutors to improve student learning outcomes in dialogues. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06424. ↗
  125. Torben Schmidt and Thomas Strasser. 2022. Artificial intelligence in foreign language learning and teaching: a call for intelligent practice. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 33(1):165–184. ↗
  126. Robin Schmucker, Meng Xia, Amos Azaria, and Tom Mitchell. 2024. Ruffle&riley: Insights from designing and evaluating a large language model-based conversational tutoring system. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 75–90. Springer. find
  127. Johannes Schneider, Bernd Schenk, and Christina Niklaus. 2023. Towards llm-based autograding for short textual answers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11508. ↗
  128. Kathrin Seßler, Maurice Fürstenberg, Babette Bühler, and Enkelejda Kasneci. 2024. Can ai grade your essays? a comparative analysis of large language models and teacher ratings in multidimensional essay scoring. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16337. ↗
  129. Zekai Shao, Siyu Yuan, Lin Gao, Yixuan He, Deqing Yang, and Siming Chen. 2025. Unlocking scientific concepts: How effective are llm-generated analogies for student understanding and classroom practice? arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16895. ↗
  130. Shikhar Sharma, Manas Mhasakar, Apurv Mehra, Utkarsh Venaik, Ujjwal Singhal, Dhruv Kumar, and Kashish Mittal. 2024. Comuniqa: Exploring large language models for improving english speaking skills. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIG-CAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, pages 256–267. find
  131. Lingfeng Shen, Weiting Tan, Sihao Chen, Yunmo Chen, Jingyu Zhang, Haoran Xu, Boyuan Zheng, Philipp Koehn, and Daniel Khashabi. 2024a. The language barrier: Dissecting safety challenges of llms in multilingual contexts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13136. ↗
  132. Shuanghong Shen, Qi Liu, Zhenya Huang, Yonghe Zheng, Minghao Yin, Minjuan Wang, and Enhong Chen. 2024b. A survey of knowledge tracing: Models, variants, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. ↗
  133. Yao Shi, Rongkeng Liang, and Yong Xu. 2025. Educationq: Evaluating llms’ teaching capabilities through multi-agent dialogue framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.14928. ↗
  134. Mostafa Faghih Shojaei, Rahul Gulati, Benjamin A Jasperson, Shangshang Wang, Simone Cimolato, Dangli Cao, Willie Neiswanger, and Krishna Garikipati. 2025. Ai-university: An llm-based platform for instructional alignment to scientific classrooms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08846. ↗
  135. Connor Shorten, Taghi M Khoshgoftaar, and Borko Furht. 2021. Text data augmentation for deep learning. Journal of big Data, 8(1):101. ↗
  136. Li Siyan, Teresa Shao, Zhou Yu, and Julia Hirschberg. 2024. EDEN: Empathetic dialogues for English learning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, pages 3492–3511, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  137. Jiayang Song, Yuheng Huang, Zhehua Zhou, and Lei Ma. 2024a. Multilingual blending: Llm safety alignment evaluation with language mixture. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07342. ↗
  138. SeungWoo Song, Junghun Yuk, ChangSu Choi, HanGyeol Yoo, HyeonSeok Lim, KyungTae Lim, and Jungyeul Park. 2025. Unified automated essay scoring and grammatical error correction. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025, pages 4412–4426, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  139. Yixiao Song, Kalpesh Krishna, Rajesh Bhatt, Kevin Gimpel, and Mohit Iyyer. 2024b. GEE! grammar error explanation with large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024, pages 754–781, Mexico City, Mexico. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  140. Shashank Sonkar, Kangqi Ni, Sapana Chaudhary, and Richard Baraniuk. 2024. Pedagogical alignment of large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, pages 13641–13650, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  141. Sinan Sonlu, Bennie Bendiksen, Funda Durupinar, and Uğur Güdükbay. 2024. The effects of embodiment and personality expression on learning in llm-based educational agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10993. ↗
  142. Maja Stahl, Leon Biermann, Andreas Nehring, and Henning Wachsmuth. 2024a. Exploring LLM prompting strategies for joint essay scoring and feedback generation. In Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2024), pages 283–298, Mexico City, Mexico. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  143. Maja Stahl, Leon Biermann, Andreas Nehring, and Henning Wachsmuth. 2024b. Exploring llm prompting strategies for joint essay scoring and feedback generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15845. ↗
  144. Junling Wang, Jakub Macina, Nico Daheim, Sankalan Pal Chowdhury, and Mrinmaya Sachan. 2024b. Book2Dial: Generating teacher student interactions from textbooks for cost-effective development of educational chatbots. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 9707– 9731, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  145. John Stamper, Ruiwei Xiao, and Xinying Hou. 2024. Enhancing llm-based feedback: Insights from intelligent tutoring systems and the learning sciences. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 32–43. Springer. find
  146. Ke Wang, Jiahui Zhu, Minjie Ren, Zeming Liu, Shiwei Li, Zongye Zhang, Chenkai Zhang, Xiaoyu Wu, Qiqi Zhan, Qingjie Liu, and 1 others. 2024c. A survey on data synthesis and augmentation for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12896. ↗
  147. Danny D Steinberg and Natalia V Sciarini. 2013. An introduction to psycholinguistics. Routledge. ↗
  148. Song Wang, Yaochen Zhu, Haochen Liu, Zaiyi Zheng, Chen Chen, and Jundong Li. 2024d. Knowledge editing for large language models: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(3):1–37. ↗
  149. Anand Syamkumar, Nora Tseng, Kaycie Barron, Shanglin Yang, Shamya Karumbaiah, Rheeya Uppal, and Junjie Hu. 2024. Improving bilingual capabilities of language models to support diverse linguistic practices in education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04308. ↗
  150. Alvin Tan, Chunhua Yu, Bria Long, Wanjing Ma, Tonya Murray, Rebecca Silverman, Jason Yeatman, and Michael C Frank. 2024. Devbench: A multimodal developmental benchmark for language learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:77445–77467.
  151. Vidya Ratna Taneja. 1995. Educational thought and practice. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd. find
  152. Yi Tang, Chia-Ming Chang, and Xi Yang. 2024. Pdfchatannotator: A human-llm collaborative multimodal data annotation tool for pdf-format catalogs. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 419–430. find
  153. Peter Toma. 1977. Systran as a multilingual machine translation system. In Proceedings of the Third European Congress on Information Systems and Networks, overcoming the language barrier, pages 569–581. find
  154. Yongqi Tong, Dawei Li, Sizhe Wang, Yujia Wang, Fei Teng, and Jingbo Shang. 2024. Can llms learn from previous mistakes? investigating llms’ errors to boost for reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.20046. ↗
  155. Petter Törnberg. 2024. Best practices for text annotation with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05129. ↗
  156. A Vaswani. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
  157. Roumen Vesselinov and John Grego. 2012. Duolingo effectiveness study. City University of New York, USA, 28(1-25). find
  158. Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2024a. Challenges and opportunities in translating ethical ai principles into practice for children. Nature Machine Intelligence, 6(3):265–270. ↗
  159. Tianfu Wang, Yi Zhan, Jianxun Lian, Zhengyu Hu, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Qi Zhang, Xing Xie, and Hui Xiong. 2025. Llm-powered multi-agent framework for goal-oriented learning in intelligent tutoring system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15749. ↗
  160. Xinru Wang, Hannah Kim, Sajjadur Rahman, Kushan Mitra, and Zhengjie Miao. 2024e. Human-llm collaborative annotation through effective verification of llm labels. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–21. find
  161. John L Watzke. 2003. Lasting change in foreign language education: A historical case for change in national policy. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. find
  162. Marion Williams, Robert Burden, Gérard Poulet, and Ian Maun. 2004. Learners’ perceptions of their successes and failures in foreign language learning. Language Learning Journal, 30(1):19–29. ↗
  163. Jane Willis. 2021. A framework for task-based learning. Intrinsic Books Ltd. find
  164. Xingjiao Wu, Luwei Xiao, Yixuan Sun, Junhang Zhang, Tianlong Ma, and Liang He. 2022. A survey of human-in-the-loop for machine learning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 135:364–381. ↗
  165. Changrong Xiao, Wenxing Ma, Qingping Song, Sean Xin Xu, Kunpeng Zhang, Yufang Wang, and Qi Fu. 2024. Human-ai collaborative essay scoring: A dual-process framework with llms. Preprint, arXiv:2401.06431. ↗
  166. Changrong Xiao, Sean Xin Xu, Kunpeng Zhang, Yufang Wang, and Lei Xia. 2023. Evaluating reading comprehension exercises generated by LLMs: A showcase of ChatGPT in education applications. In Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2023), pages 610–625, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  167. Bihan Xu, Zhenya Huang, Jiayu Liu, Shuanghong Shen, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, Jinze Wu, and Shijin Wang. 2023. Learning behavior-oriented knowledge tracing. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 2789– 2800. find
  168. Songlin Xu, Xinyu Zhang, and Lianhui Qin. 2024. Eduagent: Generative student agents in learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07963. ↗
  169. Zonghai Yao, Aditya Parashar, Huixue Zhou, Won Seok Jang, Feiyun Ouyang, Zhichao Yang, and Hong Yu. 2024. Mcqg-srefine: Multiple choice question generation and evaluation with iterative self-critique, correction, and comparison feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13191. ↗
  170. Jingheng Ye, Yinghui Li, Yangning Li, and Hai-Tao Zheng. 2023. MixEdit: Revisiting data augmentation and beyond for grammatical error correction. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 10161–10175, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  171. Jingheng Ye, Shang Qin, Yinghui Li, Xuxin Cheng, Libo Qin, Hai-Tao Zheng, Peng Xing, Zishan Xu, Guo Cheng, and Zhao Wei. 2024. Excgec: A benchmark of edit-wise explainable chinese grammatical error correction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00924. ↗
  172. Yong Yu, Xiaosheng Si, Changhua Hu, and Jianxun Zhang. 2019. A review of recurrent neural networks: Lstm cells and network architectures. Neural computation, 31(7):1235–1270. ↗
  173. Murong Yue, Wijdane Mifdal, Yixuan Zhang, Jennifer Suh, and Ziyu Yao. 2024. Mathvc: An llm-simulated multi-character virtual classroom for mathematics education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06711. ↗
  174. Weihao Zeng, Lulu Zhao, Keqing He, Ruotong Geng, Jingang Wang, Wei Wu, and Weiran Xu. 2023. Seen to unseen: Exploring compositional generalization of multi-attribute controllable dialogue generation. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 14179–14196, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  175. Zhiyuan Zeng, Jiatong Yu, Tianyu Gao, Yu Meng, Tanya Goyal, and Danqi Chen. 2024. Evaluating large language models at evaluating instruction following. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. ↗
  176. Daochen Zha, Zaid Pervaiz Bhat, Kwei-Herng Lai, Fan Yang, Zhimeng Jiang, Shaochen Zhong, and Xia Hu. 2023. Data-centric artificial intelligence: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys. find
  177. Bojun Zhan, Teng Guo, Xueyi Li, Mingliang Hou, Qianru Liang, Boyu Gao, Weiqi Luo, and Zitao Liu. 2024. Knowledge tracing as language processing: A large-scale autoregressive paradigm. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 177–191. Springer. find
  178. Hanqing Zhang, Haolin Song, Shaoyu Li, Ming Zhou, and Dawei Song. 2023. A survey of controllable text generation using transformer-based pre-trained language models. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(3):1– 37. ↗
  179. Ningyu Zhang, Yunzhi Yao, Bozhong Tian, Peng Wang, Shumin Deng, Mengru Wang, Zekun Xi, Shengyu Mao, Jintian Zhang, Yuansheng Ni, and 1 others. 2024a. A comprehensive study of knowledge editing for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01286. ↗
  180. Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Lu Chen, Yixing Fan, and Xueqi Cheng. 2021. A review on question generation from natural language text. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 40(1):1–43. ↗
  181. Zheyuan Zhang, Daniel Zhang-Li, Jifan Yu, Linlu Gong, Jinchang Zhou, Zhiyuan Liu, Lei Hou, and Juanzi Li. 2024b. Simulating classroom education with llm-empowered agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19226. ↗
  182. Daniel Zhang-Li, Zheyuan Zhang, Jifan Yu, Joy Lim Jia Yin, Shangqing Tu, Linlu Gong, Haohua Wang, Zhiyuan Liu, Huiqin Liu, Lei Hou, and 1 others. 2024. Awaking the slides: A tuning-free and knowledge-regulated ai tutoring system via language model coordination. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07372. ↗
  183. Ying Zheng, Xueyi Li, Yaying Huang, Qianru Liang, Teng Guo, Mingliang Hou, Boyu Gao, Mi Tian, Zitao Liu, and Weiqi Luo. 2024. Automatic lesson plan generation via large language models with self-critique prompting. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 163–178. Springer. find
  184. Wanjun Zhong, Lianghong Guo, Qiqi Gao, He Ye, and Yanlin Wang. 2024. Memorybank: Enhancing large language models with long-term memory. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 19724–19731. find
  185. Ruiyang Zhou, Lu Chen, and Kai Yu. 2024. Is LLM a reliable reviewer? a comprehensive evaluation of LLM on automatic paper reviewing tasks. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024), pages 9340– 9351, Torino, Italia. ELRA and ICCL.
  186. Yizhou Zhou, Mengqiao Zhang, Yuan-Hao Jiang, Xinyu Gao, Naijie Liu, and Bo Jiang. 2025. A study on educational data analysis and personalized feedback report generation based on tags and chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06819. ↗
  187. Xinlin Zhuang, Hongyi Wu, Xinshu Shen, Peimin Yu, Gaowei Yi, Xinhao Chen, Tu Hu, Yang Chen, Yupei Ren, Yadong Zhang, Youqi Song, Binxuan Liu, and Man Lan. 2024. TOREE: Evaluating topic relevance of student essays for Chinese primary and middle school education. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 5749–5765, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ye-2025-position-llms-can-be-good/