Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2026 / Multi-LLM Collaborative Search for Complex Problem Solving

Multi-LLM Collaborative Search for Complex Problem Solving

Paper · 2026 · Sen Yang, Yafu Li, Wai Lam et al.

Summary

LLMs often fail on multi-step reasoning because the reasoning space is huge and natural language is ambiguous. Step-wise tree search helps, but it needs diverse, high-quality candidate steps. Raising the sampling temperature of one model is a fragile way to get that diversity, and a single model can still get stuck in local optima. The authors propose Mixture-of-Search-Agents (MoSA), which uses Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with several different LLMs as search agents. At each expansion step, the models generate sub-questions and sub-answers. They do this both independently and by refining each other's candidates, and the final sub-answers are chosen by majority voting. MoSA was tested on GSM8K, SVAMP, MATH-500 and StrategyQA. It beats single-LLM search (RAP) and other multi-agent baselines at comparable compute, with an average gain of 1.71%. It also works alongside rStar's larger action set. The work shows that combining models is a more reliable way to diversify search than tuning decoding settings.

Key points

  • The default MoSA setup combines four distinct LLMs: Llama, GLM, Qwen and Ministral. They act as proposers of reasoning steps and as aggregators of candidate sub-answers.
  • Adding rStar's five-action space and MoSA raises MATH-500 accuracy from 59.00% to 63.20%.
  • In the ablation, reducing proposers to a single model costs more accuracy (−1.23%) than reducing aggregators (−0.47%). Diversity among proposers therefore matters most.
  • A temperature sweep (0.25–1.25) of single-LLM search, with diversity measured by n-gram Vendi Score, shows accuracy first rising and then falling. The best temperature also differs between benchmarks. MoSA with default sampling settings stays ahead.
  • Cost is about 200–300 forward calls per query without aggregation and about 500 with it. Results may also depend on the prompt templates used.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Sen Yang, Yafu Li, Wai Lam and Yu Cheng. 2026. Multi-LLM Collaborative Search for Complex Problem Solving. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2115

@inproceedings{yang2026multi,
  title = {{Multi-LLM Collaborative Search for Complex Problem Solving}},
  author = {Sen Yang, Yafu Li, Wai Lam and Yu Cheng},
  booktitle = {Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2115},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2115}
}

References

46 references, 21 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Maciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger, Michal Podstawski, Lukas Gianinazzi, Joanna Gajda, Tomasz Lehmann, Hubert Niewiadomski, Piotr Nyczyk, and 1 others. 2024. Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on A… find
  2. Chi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu, Wei Xue, Shanghang Zhang, Jie Fu, and Zhiyuan Liu. 2023. Chateval: Towards better llm-based evaluators through multi-agent debate. Preprint, arXiv:2308.07201.
  3. Guoxin Chen, Minpeng Liao, Chengxi Li, and Kai Fan. 2024a. Alphamath almost zero: Process supervision without process. Preprint, arXiv:2405.03553.
  4. Justin Chen, Swarnadeep Saha, and Mohit Bansal. 2024b. ReConcile: Round-table conference improves reasoning via consensus among diverse LLMs. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 7066–7085, Bangkok, Thailand. Associ…
  5. Qiqi Chen, Xinpeng Wang, Philipp Mondorf, Michael A. Hedderich, and Barbara Plank. 2024c. Understanding when tree of thoughts succeeds: Larger models excel in generation, not discrimination. Preprint, arXiv:2410.17820. — [arXiv:2410.17820](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17820) find
  6. Wenhu Chen, Xueguang Ma, Xinyi Wang, and William W. Cohen. 2023. Program of thoughts prompting: Disentangling computation from reasoning for numerical reasoning tasks. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. find
  7. Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. 2021. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. Preprint, arXiv:2110.14168.
  8. Rémi Coulom. 2007. Efficient selectivity and backup operators in monte-carlo tree search. In Computers and Games, pages 72–83, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. find
  9. Ruomeng Ding, Chaoyun Zhang, Lu Wang, Yong Xu, Minghua Ma, Wei Zhang, Si Qin, Saravan Rajmohan, Qingwei Lin, and Dongmei Zhang. 2024. Everything of thoughts: Defying the law of penrose triangle for thought generation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 1638… find
  10. Yilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Igor Mordatch. 2023. Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate. Preprint, arXiv:2305.14325.
  11. Dan Friedman and Adji Bousso Dieng. 2023. The vendi score: A diversity evaluation metric for machine learning. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. find
  12. Luyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon, Pengfei Liu, Yiming Yang, Jamie Callan, and Graham Neubig. 2023. Pal: program-aided language models. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’23. JMLR.org. find
  13. Mor Geva, Daniel Khashabi, Elad Segal, Tushar Khot, Dan Roth, and Jonathan Berant. 2021. Did aristotle use a laptop? a question answering benchmark with implicit reasoning strategies. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 9:346– 361. find
  14. Team GLM, Aohan Zeng, Bin Xu, Bowen Wang, Chenhui Zhang, Da Yin, Diego Rojas, Guanyu Feng, Hanlin Zhao, Hanyu Lai, Hao Yu, Hongning Wang, Jiadai Sun, Jiajie Zhang, Jiale Cheng, Jiayi Gui, Jie Tang, Jing Zhang, Juanzi Li, and 37 others. 2024. Chatglm: A family of large language models from glm-130b t…
  15. Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Alex Vaughan, Amy Yang, Angela Fan, Anirudh Goyal, Anthony Hartshorn, Aobo Yang, Archi Mitra, Archie Sravankumar, Artem Korenev, Arthur Hinsvark, and 542 o… — The Llama 3 Herd of Models
  16. Shibo Hao, Yi Gu, Haodi Ma, Joshua Hong, Zhen Wang, Daisy Wang, and Zhiting Hu. 2023. Reasoning with language model is planning with world model. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 8154–8173, Singapore. Association for Computational Lingu… find
  17. Zhitao He, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, Ruopeng Li, Mengshu Sun, and Jun Zhao. 2023. LEGO: A multi-agent collaborative framework with role-playing and iterative feedback for causality explanation generation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 9142–91… find
  18. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Saurav Kadavath, Akul Arora, Steven Basart, Eric Tang, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021. Measuring mathematical problem solving with the math dataset. NeurIPS.
  19. Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. 2020. The curious case of neural text degeneration. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  20. Yichong Huang, Xiaocheng Feng, Baohang Li, Yang Xiang, Hui Wang, Bing Qin, and Ting Liu. 2024. Ensemble learning for heterogeneous large language models with deep parallel collaboration. Preprint, arXiv:2404.12715. — [arXiv:2404.12715](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12715) find
  21. Dongfu Jiang, Xiang Ren, and Bill Yuchen Lin. 2023. LLM-blender: Ensembling large language models with pairwise ranking and generative fusion. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 14165–14178, Toronto, Canada. Assoc…
  22. Levente Kocsis and Csaba Szepesvári. 2006. Bandit based monte-carlo planning. In Machine Learning: ECML 2006, pages 282–293, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. find
  23. Jing Yu Koh, Stephen McAleer, Daniel Fried, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2024. Tree search for language model agents. Preprint, arXiv:2407.01476. find
  24. Tian Liang, Zhiwei He, Wenxiang Jiao, Xing Wang, Yan Wang, Rui Wang, Yujiu Yang, Shuming Shi, and Zhaopeng Tu. 2024. Encouraging divergent thinking in large language models through multi-agent debate. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 17…
  25. Hunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yura Burda, Harri Edwards, Bowen Baker, Teddy Lee, Jan Leike, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, and Karl Cobbe. 2023. Let’s verify step by step. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.20050.
  26. Zhipeng Liu, Xuefeng Bai, Kehai Chen, Xinyang Chen, Xiucheng Li, Yang Xiang, Jin Liu, Hong-Dong Li, Yaowei Wang, Liqiang Nie, and Min Zhang. 2025. A survey on the feedback mechanism of llm-based ai agents. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,… find
  27. Zijun Liu, Yanzhe Zhang, Peng Li, Yang Liu, and Diyi Yang. 2024. A dynamic LLM-powered agent network for task-oriented agent collaboration. In First Conference on Language Modeling. find
  28. Keming Lu, Hongyi Yuan, Runji Lin, Junyang Lin, Zheng Yuan, Chang Zhou, and Jingren Zhou. 2023. Routing to the expert: Efficient reward-guided ensemble of large language models. Preprint, arXiv:2311.08692. find
  29. AI team Mistral. 2024. Un ministral, des ministraux \| mistral ai \| frontier ai in your hands. https://mistral.ai/news/ministraux/. ↗
  30. Arkil Patel, Satwik Bhattamishra, and Navin Goyal. 2021. Are NLP models really able to solve simple math word problems? In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 2080–2094, Online. Associat…
  31. Zhenting Qi, Mingyuan Ma, Jiahang Xu, Li Lyna Zhang, Fan Yang, and Mao Yang. 2024. Mutual reasoning makes smaller llms stronger problem-solvers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06195. find
  32. Tal Shnitzer, Anthony Ou, Mírian Silva, Kate Soule, Yuekai Sun, Justin Solomon, Neil Thompson, and Mikhail Yurochkin. 2023. Large language model routing with benchmark datasets. Preprint, arXiv:2309.15789.
  33. Yihong Tang, Kehai Chen, Xuefeng Bai, Benyou Wang, Zeming Liu, Haifeng Wang, and Min Zhang. 2026. Character-r1: Enhancing role-aware reasoning in role-playing agents via rlvr. Preprint, arXiv:2601.04611. — [arXiv:2601.04611](https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04611) find
  34. Hongyi Wang, Felipe Maia Polo, Yuekai Sun, Souvik Kundu, Eric Xing, and Mikhail Yurochkin. 2024a. Fusing models with complementary expertise. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. find
  35. Junlin Wang, Jue Wang, Ben Athiwaratkun, Ce Zhang, and James Zou. 2024b. Mixture-of-agents enhances large language model capabilities. Preprint, arXiv:2406.04692. find
  36. Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V Le, Ed H. Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, and Denny Zhou. 2023. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.
  37. Dan Zhang, Sining Zhoubian, Ziniu Hu, Yisong Yue, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. 2024a. Rest-mcts*: Llm self-training via process reward guided tree search. Preprint, arXiv:2406.03816.
  38. Di Zhang, Xiaoshui Huang, Dongzhan Zhou, Yuqiang Li, and Wanli Ouyang. 2024b. Accessing gpt-4 level mathematical olympiad solutions via monte carlo tree self-refine with llama-3 8b. Preprint, arXiv:2406.07394. find
  39. Hugh Zhang, Daniel Duckworth, Daphne Ippolito, and Arvind Neelakantan. 2020. Trading off diversity and quality in natural language generation. CoRR, abs/2004.10450.
  40. Jintian Zhang, Xin Xu, Ningyu Zhang, Ruibo Liu, Bryan Hooi, and Shumin Deng. 2024c. Exploring collaboration mechanisms for LLM agents: A social psychology view. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 14544– 14607, Ban…
  41. Andy Zhou, Kai Yan, Michal Shlapentokh-Rothman, Haohan Wang, and Yu-Xiong Wang. 2023a. Language agent tree search unifies reasoning acting and planning in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04406. find
  42. Denny Zhou, Nathanael Schärli, Le Hou, Jason Wei, Nathan Scales, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Claire Cui, Olivier Bousquet, Quoc V Le, and Ed H. Chi. 2023b. Least-to-most prompting enables complex reasoning in large language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representatio…
  43. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. 2023. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Preprint, arXiv:2201.11903.
  44. Zhenran Xu, Senbao Shi, Baotian Hu, Jindi Yu, Dongfang Li, Min Zhang, and Yuxiang Wu. 2023. Towards reasoning in large language models via multi-agent peer review collaboration. Preprint, arXiv:2311.08152.
  45. An Yang, Baosong Yang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Chengpeng Li, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Guanting Dong, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jialong Tang, Jialin Wang, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Ma, and 43 others. 2024. Qwen2 technical report. Preprint, arXiv:240… find
  46. Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Tom Griffiths, Yuan Cao, and Karthik Narasimhan. 2024. Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yang-2026-multi-llm-collaborative-search-complex/