🔗 Who cites «Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluators»

76 papers of our library cite it (of the 141,840 whose bibliographies we read) · 4 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluators»

1. LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation MethodsarXiv:2412.05579Haitao Li, Qian Dong, Junjie Chen, et al.2024 · 189 citations
2. Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-JudgearXiv:2410.02736Jiayi Ye, Yanbo Wang, Yue Huang, et al.2024 · 142 citations
3. LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation TasksarXiv:2406.18403Anna Bavaresco, Raffaella Bernardi, Leonardo Bertolazzi, et al.2024 · 137 citations
   From Form to Meaning: Interlingua Sense-Alignment of Offensive Language with LLMsWorkshop on Language Technology for Equality, Diversity, InclusionMaria Alexandra Roussopoulou, Stella Markantonatou2026

72 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/stureborg-2024-large-language-models-inconsistent-biased/cited-by/