Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2026 / Alignment Tuning for Large Language Models: A Data-Centric Lens on Alignment Data Pipelines

Alignment Tuning for Large Language Models: A Data-Centric Lens on Alignment Data Pipelines

Paper · 2026 · Hwanjun Song

Summary

Work on aligning LLMs is usually organized around training objectives such as PPO or DPO. The process that produces the alignment data gets little explicit attention. This survey by Hwanjun Song argues that preference data is created in a loop of prompts, current-policy outputs and feedback. Alignment quality therefore depends mainly on how that loop is engineered, not on a fixed dataset.

The author frames alignment tuning as a pipeline design problem with three coupled stages:

  • Response synthesis: where candidate responses come from, and how they are selected or diversified.
  • Preference evaluation: who judges, at what granularity, and along how many objectives.
  • Preference instantiation: whether judgments become point-wise, pair-wise or group-wise training signals.

Existing methods are placed into this taxonomy. Optimization is formally recast as matching the policy's implied preference margins to the signals the pipeline supplies. The paper offers no new algorithm or experiments. Its contribution is a shared vocabulary, a catalogue of recurring trade-offs and failure modes, constraint-based design guidance, and a research agenda.

Key points

  • Synthesis and evaluation choices: Synthesis contrasts offline (dataset/distillation) with online (self-play/iterative) sources. It also covers margin- or uncertainty-based selection and exploration via verbalized sampling or diversity penalties. Evaluation ranges from human judges to LLM-as-a-Judge, with outcome-, step- or atomic-level supervision and scalarized or multi-dimensional scores.
  • Instantiation formats and example methods: point-wise (PPO, KTO), pair-wise (DPO, SimPO) and group-wise (GRPO, LiPO).
  • Formalization: The dataset is defined as triples of a prompt, a candidate set from a synthesis strategy S, and signals from an evaluator E. PPO, DPO and GRPO are unified under a margin-alignment view.
  • Practical guidance: Tables 4–6 link constraints such as data availability, inference and labeling budgets, task complexity, VRAM and conflicting objectives to design choices. Table 3 classifies the surveyed methods, and Appendix C gives end-to-end pipeline configurations.
  • Open directions and venue: prompt-level alignment, agentic systems, evolving objectives and multi-modal alignment. Published in Findings of ACL 2026, pp. 2541–2561.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Hwanjun Song. 2026. Alignment Tuning for Large Language Models: A Data-Centric Lens on Alignment Data Pipelines. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.121

@inproceedings{song2026alignment,
  title = {{Alignment Tuning for Large Language Models: A Data-Centric Lens on Alignment Data Pipelines}},
  author = {Hwanjun Song},
  booktitle = {Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.121},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.121}
}

References

122 references, 36 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Akhil Agnihotri, Rahul Jain, Deepak Ramachandran, and Zheng Wen. 2025. Multi-objective preference optimization: Improving human alignment of generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10892. — [arXiv:2505.10892](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10892) find
  2. Kian Ahrabian, Xihui Lin, Barun Patra, Vishrav Chaudhary, Alon Benhaim, Jay Pujara, and Xia Song. 2025. A practical analysis of human alignment with* po. In NAACL. find
  3. Alon Albalak, Yanai Elazar, Sang Michael Xie, Shayne Longpre, Nathan Lambert, Xinyi Wang, Niklas Muennighoff, Bairu Hou, Liangming Pan, Haewon Jeong, Colin Raffel, Shiyu Chang, Tatsunori Hashimoto, and William Yang Wang. 2024. A survey on data selection for language models. Transactions on Machine L…
  4. Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Bilal Piot, Remi Munos, Mark Rowland, Michal Valko, and Daniele Calandriello. 2024. A general theoretical paradigm to understand learning from human preferences. In AISTAT.
  5. Chenjia Bai, Yang Zhang, Shuang Qiu, Qiaosheng Zhang, Kang Xu, and Xuelong Li. 2025. Online preference alignment for language models via count-based exploration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12735. — [arXiv:2501.12735](https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12735) find
  6. Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu, Amanda Askell, Jackson Kernion, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Cameron McKinnon, and 1 others. 2022. Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073.
  7. Avinandan Bose, Zhihan Xiong, Aadirupa Saha, Simon Shaolei Du, and Maryam Fazel. 2025. Hybrid preference optimization for alignment: Provably faster convergence rates by combining offline preferences with online exploration. In ICLRW. find
  8. Kianté Brantley, Mingyu Chen, Zhaolin Gao, Jason D Lee, Wen Sun, Wenhao Zhan, and Xuezhou Zhang. 2025. Accelerating rl for llm reasoning with optimal advantage regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20686. — [arXiv:2505.20686](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20686) find
  9. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, song2024preferenceAmanda Askell, and 1 others. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. In NeurIPS.
  10. Christopher Burges, Robert Ragno, and Quoc Le. 2006. Learning to rank with nonsmooth cost functions. In NeurIPS. find
  11. Stephen Casper, Xander Davies, Claudia Shi, Thomas Krendl Gilbert, Jérémy Scheurer, Javier Rando, Rachel Freedman, Tomasz Korbak, David Lindner, Pedro Freire, and 1 others. 2023. Open problems and fundamental limitations of reinforcement learning from human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15217. find
  12. Jiaju Chen, Yuxuan Lu, Xiaojie Wang, Huimin Zeng, Jing Huang, Jiri Gesi, Ying Xu, Bingsheng Yao, and Dakuo Wang. 2025a. Multi-agent-as-judge: Aligning llm-agent-based automated evaluation with multi-dimensional human evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21028. find
  13. Jingfeng Chen, Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, and 1 others. 2025b. Atomic consistency preference optimization for long-form question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09039. find
  14. Zixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji, and Quanquan Gu. 2024. Self-play fine-tuning converts weak language models to strong language models. In ICML. find
  15. Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Yunxuan Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, and 1 others. 2024. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(70):1–53. find
  16. John Joon Young Chung, Vishakh Padmakumar, Melissa Roemmele, Yuqian Sun, and Max Kreminski. 2025. Modifying large language model post-training for diverse creative writing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.17126. — [arXiv:2503.17126](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17126) find
  17. Josef Dai, Xuehai Pan, Ruiyang Sun, Jiaming Ji, Xinbo Xu, Mickel Liu, Yizhou Wang, and Yaodong Yang. 2023. Safe rlhf: Safe reinforcement learning from human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12773.
  18. Raghav Gupta, Ryan Sullivan, Yunxuan Li, Samrat Phatale, and Abhinav Rastogi. 2025. Robust multi-objective preference alignment with online dpo. In AAAI. find
  19. Qiang He and Setareh Maghsudi. 2025. Pareto multi-objective alignment for language models. In ECML-PKDD. find
  20. Jiwoo Hong, Noah Lee, and James Thorne. 2024. Orpo: Monolithic preference optimization without reference model. In EMNLP. find
  21. Kexin Huang, Junkang Wu, Ziqian Chen, Xue Wang, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, Jiancan Wu, Xiangnan He, and Xiang Wang. 2025. Larger or smaller reward margins to select preferences for llm alignment? In ICML. find
  22. Mete Ismayilzada, Antonio Laverghetta Jr, Simone A Luchini, Reet Patel, Antoine Bosselut, Lonneke van der Plas, and Roger Beaty. 2025. Creative preference optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14442. find
  23. Joel Jang, Seungone Kim, Bill Yuchen Lin, Yizhong Wang, Jack Hessel, Luke Zettlemoyer, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Yejin Choi, and Prithviraj Ammanabrolu. 2023. Personalized soups: Personalized large language model alignment via post-hoc parameter merging. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11564.
  24. Jiaming Ji, Tianyi Qiu, Boyuan Chen, Borong Zhang, Hantao Lou, Kaile Wang, Yawen Duan, Zhonghao He, Jiayi Zhou, Zhaowei Zhang, and 1 others. 2023. Ai alignment: A comprehensive survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19852.
  25. Seungjae Jung, Gunsoo Han, Daniel Wontae Nam, and Kyoung-Woon On. 2025. Binary classifier optimization for large language model alignment. In ACL.
  26. Xun Deng, Han Zhong, Rui Ai, Fuli Feng, Zheng Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2025. Less is more: Improving llm alignment via preference data selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14560. — [arXiv:2502.14560](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14560) find
  27. Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361.
  28. Yi Dong, Zhilin Wang, Makesh Sreedhar, Xianchao Wu, and Oleksii Kuchaiev. 2023. Steerlm: Attribute conditioned sft as an (user-steerable) alternative to rlhf. In EMNLP. find
  29. Saeed Khaki, JinJin Li, Lan Ma, Liu Yang, and Prathap Ramachandra. 2024. Rs-dpo: A hybrid rejection sampling and direct preference optimization method for alignment of large language models. In NAACL. find
  30. Yilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Igor Mordatch. 2024. Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate. In ICML.
  31. Dahyun Kim, Yungi Kim, Wonho Song, Hyeonwoo Kim, Yunsu Kim, Sanghoon Kim, and Chanjun Park. 2025. sdpo: Don’t use your data all at once. In COLING.
  32. Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky, and Douwe Kiela. 2024. Kto: Model alignment as prospect theoretic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01306. find
  33. Kyuyoung Kim, Ah Seo, Hao Liu, Jinwoo Shin, and Kimin Lee. 2024a. Margin matching preference optimization: Enhanced model alignment with granular feedback. In EMNLP. find
  34. William Fedus, Barret Zoph, and Noam Shazeer. 2022. Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(120):1–39. find
  35. Seungone Kim, Juyoung Suk, Shayne Longpre, Bill Yuchen Lin, Jamin Shin, Sean Welleck, Graham Neubig, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee, and Minjoon Seo. 2024b. Prometheus 2: An open source language model specialized in evaluating other language models. In EMNLP.
  36. Robert Kirk, Ishita Mediratta, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Jelena Luketina, Eric Hambro, Edward Grefenstette, and Roberta Raileanu. 2024. Understanding the effects of rlhf on llm generalisation and diversity. In ICLR.
  37. Tom Kocmi and Christian Federmann. 2023. Large language models are state-of-the-art evaluators of translation quality. In EAMT. find
  38. Jack Lanchantin, Angelica Chen, Shehzaad Dhuliawala, Ping Yu, Jason Weston, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, and Ilia Kulikov. 2025. Diverse preference optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18101. — [arXiv:2501.18101](https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18101) find
  39. Hung Le, Quan Hung Tran, Dung Nguyen, Kien Do, Saloni Mittal, Kelechi Ogueji, and Svetha Venkatesh. 2025. Multi-reference preference optimization for large language models. In AAAI. find
  40. Harrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard, Johan Ferret, Kellie Ren Lu, Colton Bishop, Ethan Hall, Victor Carbune, Abhinav Rastogi, and 1 others. 2024. Rlaif vs. rlhf: Scaling reinforcement learning from human feedback with ai feedback. In ICML. find
  41. Chengao Li, Hanyu Zhang, Yunkun Xu, Hongyan Xue, Xiang Ao, and Qing He. 2025a. Gradient-adaptive policy optimization: Towards multi-objective alignment of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01915. find
  42. Dawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi, Chengshuai Zhao, Zhen Tan, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Yuxuan Jiang, Canyu Chen, Tianhao Wu, and 1 others. 2025b. From generation to judgment: Opportunities and challenges of llm-as-a-judge. In EMNLP. find
  43. Haitao Li, Qian Dong, Junjie Chen, Huixue Su, Yujia Zhou, Qingyao Ai, Ziyi Ye, and Yiqun Liu. 2024. Llms-as-judges: a comprehensive survey on llm-based evaluation methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05579.
  44. Lei Li, Hehuan Liu, Yaxin Zhou, ZhaoYang Gui, Xudong Weng, Yi Yuan, Zheng Wei, and Zang Li. 2025c. Uncertainty-aware iterative preference optimization for enhanced llm reasoning. In ACL. find
  45. Ziniu Li, Tian Xu, Yushun Zhang, Zhihang Lin, Yang Yu, Ruoyu Sun, and Zhi-Quan Luo. 2023. Remax: A simple, effective, and efficient reinforcement learning method for aligning large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10505. find
  46. Yong Lin, Hangyu Lin, Wei Xiong, Shizhe Diao, Jianmeng Liu, Jipeng Zhang, Rui Pan, Haoxiang Wang, Wenbin Hu, Hanning Zhang, and 1 others. 2024. Mitigating the alignment tax of rlhf. In EMNLP.
  47. Aiwei Liu, Haoping Bai, Zhiyun Lu, Yanchao Sun, Xiang Kong, Simon Wang, Jiulong Shan, Albin Madappally Jose, Xiaojiang Liu, Lijie Wen, and 1 others. 2025a. Tis-dpo: Token-level importance sampling for direct preference optimization with estimated weights. In ICLR. find
  48. Bo Liu, Chuanyang Jin, Seungone Kim, Weizhe Yuan, Wenting Zhao, Ilia Kulikov, Xian Li, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jack Lanchantin, and Jason Weston. 2025b. Spice: Self-play in corpus environments improves reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24684. — [arXiv:2510.24684](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24684) find
  49. Qian Liu, Xiaosen Zheng, Niklas Muennighoff, Guangtao Zeng, Longxu Dou, Tianyu Pang, Jing Jiang, and Min Lin. 2025c. RegMix: Data mixture as regression for language model pre-training. In ICLR.
  50. Shujun Liu, Xiaoyu Shen, Yuhang Lai, Siyuan Wang, Shengbin Yue, Zengfeng Huang, Xuan-Jing Huang, and Zhongyu Wei. 2025d. Haf-rm: A hybrid alignment framework for reward model training. In ACL). find
  51. Shunyu Liu, Wenkai Fang, Zetian Hu, Junjie Zhang, Yang Zhou, Kongcheng Zhang, Rongcheng Tu, Ting-En Lin, Fei Huang, Mingli Song, and 1 others. 2025e. A survey of direct preference optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11701. — [arXiv:2503.11701](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11701) find
  52. Tianci Liu, Ran Xu, Tony Yu, Ilgee Hong, Carl Yang, Tuo Zhao, and Haoyu Wang. 2025f. Openrubrics: Towards scalable synthetic rubric generation for reward modeling and llm alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07743.
  53. Tianqi Liu, Zhen Qin, Junru Wu, Jiaming Shen, Misha Khalman, Rishabh Joshi, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, Simon Baumgartner, Jialu Liu, and 1 others. 2025g. Lipo: Listwise preference optimization through learning-to-rank. In NAACL.
  54. Yang Liu, Jiahuan Cao, Chongyu Liu, Kai Ding, and Lianwen Jin. 2025h. Datasets for large language models: A comprehensive survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(12):403. find
  55. Xuying Li, Zhuo Li, Yuji Kosuga, and Victor Bian. 2025d. Optimizing safe and aligned language generation: A multi-objective grpo approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21819. — [arXiv:2503.21819](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21819) find
  56. Yang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang, Ruochen Xu, and Chenguang Zhu. 2023. G-eval: Nlg evaluation using gpt-4 with better human alignment. In EMNLP.
  57. Yi-Chen Li, Tian Xu, Yang Yu, Xuqin Zhang, Xiong-Hui Chen, Zhongxiang Ling, Ningjing Chao, Lei Yuan, and Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2025e. Generalist reward models: Found inside large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23235. — [arXiv:2506.23235](https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23235) find
  58. Yilun Liu, Shimin Tao, Xiaofeng Zhao, Ming Zhu, Wenbing Ma, Junhao Zhu, Chang Su, Yutai Hou, Miao Zhang, Min Zhang, and 1 others. 2024. Coachlm: Automatic instruction revisions improve the data quality in llm instruction tuning. In ICDE. IEEE. find
  59. Zichen Liu, Changyu Chen, Wenjun Li, Penghui Qi, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Wee Sun Lee, and Min Lin. 2025i. Understanding r1-zero-like training: A critical perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20783.
  60. Xingzhou Lou, Junge Zhang, Jian Xie, Lifeng Liu, Dong Yan, and Kaiqi Huang. 2024. Spo: Multi-dimensional preference sequential alignment with implicit reward modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12739. — [arXiv:2405.12739](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.12739) find
  61. Liangchen Luo, Yinxiao Liu, Rosanne Liu, Samrat Phatale, Meiqi Guo, Harsh Lara, Yunxuan Li, Lei Shu, Lei Meng, Jiao Sun, and 1 others. 2025. Improve mathematical reasoning in language models with automated process supervision. In ICLR. find
  62. Saaduddin Mahmud, Mason Nakamura, and Shlomo Zilberstein. 2025. Maple: A framework for active preference learning guided by large language models. In AAAI. find
  63. Yu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, and Danqi Chen. 2024. Simpo: Simple preference optimization with a reference-free reward. In NeurIPS. find
  64. Hyangsuk Min, Yuho Lee, Minjeong Ban, Jiaqi Deng, Nicole Hee-Yeon Kim, Taewon Yun, Hang Su, Jason Cai, and Hwanjun Song. 2025. Towards multidimensional evaluation of llm summarization across domains and languages. In ACL. find
  65. Shervin Minaee, Tomas Mikolov, Narjes Nikzad, Meysam Chenaghlu, Richard Socher, Xavier Amatriain, and Jianfeng Gao. 2024. Large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06196.
  66. Subhojyoti Mukherjee, Anusha Lalitha, Sailik Sengupta, Aniket Deshmukh, and Branislav Kveton. 2024. Multi-objective alignment of large language models through hypervolume maximization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05469. — [arXiv:2412.05469](https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05469) find
  67. William Muldrew, Peter Hayes, Mingtian Zhang, and David Barber. 2024. Active preference learning for large language models. In ICML. find
  68. Sonia Krishna Murthy, Tomer Ullman, and Jennifer Hu. 2025. One fish, two fish, but not the whole sea: Alignment reduces language models’ conceptual diversity. In NAACL. find
  69. Wojciech Nazar, Grzegorz Nazar, Aleksandra Kamińska, and Ludmila Danilowicz-Szymanowicz. 2025. How to design, create, and evaluate an instruction-tuning dataset for large language model training in health care: Tutorial from a clinical perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27. find
  70. Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, and 1 others. 2022. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. In NeurIPS.
  71. Alexander Pan, Erik Jones, Meena Jagadeesan, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2024. Feedback loops with language models drive in-context reward hacking. In ICML. find
  72. Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D Manning, Stefano Ermon, and Chelsea Finn. 2023. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:53728–53741.
  73. Shyam Sundhar Ramesh, Yifan Hu, Iason Chaimalas, Viraj Mehta, Pier Giuseppe Sessa, Haitham Bou Ammar, and Ilija Bogunovic. 2024. Group robust preference optimization in reward-free rlhf. In NeurIPS. find
  74. John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. 2017. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347. find
  75. Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, YK Li, Yang Wu, and 1 others. 2024. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300.
  76. Feifan Song, Bowen Yu, Minghao Li, Haiyang Yu, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li, and Houfeng Wang. 2024. Preference ranking optimization for human alignment. In AAAI.
  77. Hwanjun Song, Taewon Yun, Yuho Lee, Jihwan Oh, Gihun Lee, Jason Cai, and Hang Su. 2025. Learning to summarize from LLM-generated feedback. In NAACL. find
  78. Taylor Sorensen, Benjamin Newman, Jared Moore, Chan Park, Jillian Fisher, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Liwei Jiang, and Yejin Choi. 2025. Spectrum tuning: Post-training for distributional coverage and in-context steerability. find
  79. Nisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Daniel Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul F Christiano. 2020. Learning to summarize with human feedback. In NeurIPS. find
  80. Haoran Sun, Zekun Zhang, and Shaoning Zeng. 2025. An uncertainty-driven adaptive self-alignment framework for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.17477. — [arXiv:2507.17477](https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17477) find
  81. Zhiqing Sun, Yikang Shen, Qinhong Zhou, Hongxin Zhang, Zhenfang Chen, David Cox, Yiming Yang, and Chuang Gan. 2023. Principle-driven self-alignment of language models from scratch with minimal human supervision. In NeurIPS.
  82. Yingshui Tan, Yilei Jiang, Yanshi Li, Jiaheng Liu, Xingyuan Bu, Wenbo Su, Xiangyu Yue, Xiaoyong Zhu, and Bo Zheng. 2025. Equilibrate rlhf: Towards balancing helpfulness-safety trade-off in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11555. — [arXiv:2502.11555](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11555) find
  83. Yunhao Tang, Daniel Zhaohan Guo, Zeyu Zheng, Daniele Calandriello, Rémi Munos, Mark Rowland, Pierre Harvey Richemond, Michal Valko, Bernardo Ávila Pires, and Bilal Piot. 2024. Generalized preference optimization: a unified approach to offline alignment. In ICML. find
  84. Tuhina Tripathi, Manya Wadhwa, Greg Durrett, and Scott Niekum. 2025. Pairwise or pointwise? evaluating feedback protocols for bias in llm-based evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.14716. — [arXiv:2504.14716](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14716) find
  85. Jianing Wang, Yang Zhou, Xiaocheng Zhang, Mengjiao Bao, and Peng Yan. 2025a. Self-evolutionary large language models through uncertainty-enhanced preference optimization. In AAAI. find
  86. Peiyi Wang, Lei Li, Liang Chen, Zefan Cai, Dawei Zhu, Binghuai Lin, Yunbo Cao, Lingpeng Kong, Qi Liu, Tianyu Liu, and 1 others. 2024a. Large language models are not fair evaluators. In ACL). find
  87. Xun Wu, Shaohan Huang, Wenhui Wang, Shuming Ma, Li Dong, and Furu Wei. 2024. Multi-head mixture-of-experts. NeurIPS. find
  88. Yue Wu, Zhiqing Sun, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji, Yiming Yang, and Quanquan Gu. 2025b. Self-play preference optimization for language model alignment. In ICLR. find
  89. Zeqiu Wu, Yushi Hu, Weijia Shi, Nouha Dziri, Alane Suhr, Prithviraj Ammanabrolu, Noah A Smith, Mari Ostendorf, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023. Fine-grained human feedback gives better rewards for language model training. In NeurIPS.
  90. Wenyi Xiao, Zechuan Wang, Leilei Gan, Shuai Zhao, Zongrui Li, Ruirui Lei, Wanggui He, Luu Anh Tuan, Long Chen, Hao Jiang, and 1 others. 2024. A comprehensive survey of direct preference optimization: Datasets, theories, variants, and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15595. — [arXiv:2410.15595](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15595) find
  91. Peiyi Wang, Lei Li, Zhihong Shao, Runxin Xu, Damai Dai, Yifei Li, Deli Chen, Yu Wu, and Zhifang Sui. 2024b. Math-shepherd: Verify and reinforce llms step-by-step without human annotations. In ACL.
  92. Wei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang, Han Zhong, Heng Ji, Nan Jiang, and Tong Zhang. 2024. Iterative preference learning from human feedback: Bridging theory and practice for rlhf under kl-constraint. In ICML.
  93. Yeyuan Wang, Dehong Gao, Rujiao Long, Lei Yi, Linbo Jin, Libin Yang, and Xiaoyan Cai. 2025b. Aspo: Adaptive sentence-level preference optimization for fine-grained multimodal reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19100. find
  94. Xinyi Xu, Zhaoxuan Wu, Rui Qiao, Arun Verma, Yao Shu, Jingtan Wang, Xinyuan Niu, Zhenfeng He, Jiangwei Chen, Zijian Zhou, and 1 others. 2024. Data-centric ai in the age of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14473. — [arXiv:2406.14473](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14473) find
  95. Zhilin Wang, Yi Dong, Olivier Delalleau, Jiaqi Zeng, Gerald Shen, Daniel Egert, Jimmy Zhang, Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, and Oleksii Kuchaiev. 2024c. Helpsteer 2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward models. In NeurIPS. find
  96. Zhichao Yan, Jiapu Wang, Jiaoyan Chen, Xiaoli Li, Jiye Liang, Ru Li, and Jeff Z Pan. 2025. Atomic fact decomposition helps attributed question answering. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. find
  97. Zhilin Wang, Yi Dong, Jiaqi Zeng, Virginia Adams, Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, Daniel Egert, Olivier Delalleau, Jane Scowcroft, Neel Kant, Aidan Swope, and 1 others. 2024d. Helpsteer: Multi-attribute helpfulness dataset for steerlm. In NAACL.
  98. Ziyi Yang, Fanqi Wan, Longguang Zhong, Tianyuan Shi, and Xiaojun Quan. 2025. Weighted-reward preference optimization for implicit model fusion. In ICLR. find
  99. Zhilin Wang, Jiaqi Zeng, Olivier Delalleau, Ellie Evans, Daniel Egert, Hoo-Chang Shin, Felipe Soares, Yi Dong, and Oleksii Kuchaiev. 2025c. Rlbff: Binary flexible feedback to bridge between human feedback and verifiable rewards. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.21319. — [arXiv:2509.21319](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21319) find
  100. Zige Wang, Wanjun Zhong, Yufei Wang, Qi Zhu, Fei Mi, Baojun Wang, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, and Qun Liu. 2023. Data management for training large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.01700. — [arXiv:2312.01700](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01700)
  101. Koki Wataoka, Tsubasa Takahashi, and Ryokan Ri. 2024. Self-preference bias in llm-as-a-judge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21819.
  102. Junkang Wu, Xue Wang, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, Xiang Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2025a. Alphadpo: Adaptive reward margin for direct preference optimization. In ICML. find
  103. Daren Yao, Jinsong Yuan, and Ruike Chen. 2025. Enhancing small llm alignment through margin-based objective modifications under resource constraints. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.08466. — [arXiv:2508.08466](https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08466) find
  104. Min-Hsuan Yeh, Jeffrey Wang, Xuefeng Du, Seongheon Park, Leitian Tao, Shawn Im, and Yixuan Li. 2025. Position: Challenges and future directions of data-centric ai alignment. In ICML. find
  105. Ping Yu, Jack Lanchantin, Tianlu Wang, Weizhe Yuan, Olga Golovneva, Ilia Kulikov, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jason Weston, and Jing Xu. 2025a. Cot-self-instruct: Building high-quality synthetic prompts for reasoning and non-reasoning tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.23751. — [arXiv:2507.23751](https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23751) find
  106. Qiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan, Xiaochen Zuo, Yu Yue, Weinan Dai, Tiantian Fan, Gaohong Liu, Lingjun Liu, and 1 others. 2025b. Dapo: An open-source llm reinforcement learning system at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14476.
  107. Tianshu Yu, Ting-En Lin, Yuchuan Wu, Min Yang, Fei Huang, and Yongbin Li. 2025c. Diverse ai feedback for large language model alignment. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 13:392–407. find
  108. Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric Xing, and 1 others. 2023. Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena. In NeurIPS.
  109. Yue Yu, Zhengxing Chen, Aston Zhang, Liang Tan, Chenguang Zhu, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Yundi Qian, Xuewei Wang, Suchin Gururangan, Chao Zhang, and 1 others. 2025d. Self-generated critiques boost reward modeling for language models. In NAACL. find
  110. Wenxuan Zhou, Ravi Agrawal, Shujian Zhang, Sathish Reddy Indurthi, Sanqiang Zhao, Kaiqiang Song, Silei Xu, and Chenguang Zhu. 2024. Wpo: Enhancing rlhf with weighted preference optimization. In EMNLP. find
  111. Hongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Chuanqi Tan, Wei Wang, Songfang Huang, and Fei Huang. 2023. Rrhf: Rank responses to align language models with human feedback. In EMNLP. find
  112. Xuanhe Zhou, Junxuan He, Wei Zhou, Haodong Chen, Zirui Tang, Haoyu Zhao, Xin Tong, Guoliang Li, Youmin Chen, Jun Zhou, and 1 others. 2025. A survey of llm x data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18458. — [arXiv:2505.18458](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18458) find
  113. Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jing Xu, and Jason E Weston. 2024. Self-rewarding language models. In ICLR. find
  114. Xinlin Zhuang, Jiahui Peng, Ren Ma, Yinfan Wang, Tianyi Bai, Xingjian Wei, Qiu Jiantao, Chi Zhang, Ying Qian, and Conghui He. 2025. Meta-rater: A multi-dimensional data selection method for pre-training language models. In ACL. find
  115. Thomas Zeng, Shuibai Zhang, Shutong Wu, Christian Classen, Daewon Chae, Ethan Ewer, Minjae Lee, Heeju Kim, Wonjun Kang, Jackson Kunde, Ying Fan, Jungtaek Kim, Hyung Il Koo, Kannan Ramchandran, Dimitris Papailiopoulos, and Kangwook Lee. 2025. VersaPRM: Multi-domain process reward model via synthetic… find
  116. Yongcheng Zeng, Guoqing Liu, Weiyu Ma, Ning Yang, Haifeng Zhang, and Jun Wang. 2024. Token-level direct preference optimization. In ICML. find
  117. Jiayi Zhang, Simon Yu, Derek Chong, Anthony Sicilia, Michael R Tomz, Christopher D Manning, and Weiyan Shi. 2025a. Verbalized sampling: How to mitigate mode collapse and unlock llm diversity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01171. find
  118. Lunjun Zhang, Arian Hosseini, Hritik Bansal, Mehran Kazemi, Aviral Kumar, and Rishabh Agarwal. 2025b. Generative verifiers: Reward modeling as next-token prediction. In ICLR.
  119. Shenao Zhang, Donghan Yu, Hiteshi Sharma, Han Zhong, Zhihan Liu, Ziyi Yang, Shuohang Wang, Hany Hassan Awadalla, and Zhaoran Wang. 2025c. Self-exploring language models: Active preference elicitation for online alignment. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. find
  120. Yang Zhao, Yixin Wang, and Mingzhang Yin. 2025. Permutative preference alignment from listwise ranking of human judgments. In EMNLP. find
  121. Yao Zhao, Rishabh Joshi, Tianqi Liu, Misha Khalman, Mohammad Saleh, and Peter J Liu. 2023. Slic-hf: Sequence likelihood calibration with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10425.
  122. Congming Zheng, Jiachen Zhu, Zhuoying Ou, Yuxiang Chen, Kangning Zhang, Rong Shan, Zeyu Zheng, Mengyue Yang, Jianghao Lin, Yong Yu, and 1 others. 2025. A survey of process reward models: From outcome signals to process supervisions for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08049. — [arXiv:2510.08049](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08049) find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/song-2026-alignment-tuning-large-language-models/