Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / Proof or Bluff? Evaluating LLMs on 2025 USA Math… / cited by

Who cites «Proof or Bluff? Evaluating LLMs on 2025 USA Math Olympiad»

30 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 15 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Proof or Bluff? Evaluating LLMs on 2025 USA Math Olympiad»

  1. Goedel-Prover-V2: Scaling Formal Theorem Proving with Scaffolded Data Synthesis and Self-CorrectionarXiv:2508.03613Yong Lin, Shange Tang, Bohan Lyu, et al.2025 · 67 citations
  2. Phi-4-reasoning Technical ReportarXiv:2504.21318Marah Abdin, Sahaj Agarwal, Ahmed Awadallah, et al.2025 · 64 citations
  3. Seed-Prover: Deep and Broad Reasoning for Automated Theorem ProvingarXiv:2507.23726Luoxin Chen, Jinming Gu, Liankai Huang, et al.2025 · 46 citations
  4. A Sober Look at Progress in Language Model Reasoning: Pitfalls and Paths to ReproducibilityarXiv:2504.07086Andreas Hochlehnert, Hardik Bhatnagar, Vishaal Udandarao, et al.2025 · 36 citations
  5. Hilbert: Recursively Building Formal Proofs with Informal ReasoningarXiv:2509.22819Sumanth Varambally, Thomas Voice, Yanchao Sun, et al.2025 · 26 citations
  6. When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific ResearcharXiv:2505.11855Guijin Son, Jiwoo Hong, Honglu Fan, et al.2025 · 13 citations
  7. The Open Proof Corpus: A Large-Scale Study of LLM-Generated Mathematical ProofsarXiv:2506.21621Jasper Dekoninck, Ivo Petrov, Kristian Minchev, et al.2025 · 11 citations

15 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/petrov-2025-proof-or-bluff-evaluating-llms/cited-by/