🔗 Who cites «Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis»

89 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 27 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis»

1. The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific DiscoveryarXiv:2408.06292Chris Lu, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange, et al.2024 · 372 citations
2. Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP ResearchersarXiv:2409.04109Chenglei Si, Diyi Yang, Tatsunori Hashimoto2024 · 196 citations
3. Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research AssistantsarXiv:2501.04227Samuel Schmidgall, Yusheng Su, Ze Wang, et al.2025 · 139 citations
4. Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer ReviewsarXiv:2403.07183Weixin Liang, Zachary Izzo, Yaohui Zhang, et al.2024 · 119 citations
5. Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific PapersarXiv:2404.01268Weixin Liang, Yaohui Zhang, Zhengxuan Wu, et al.2024 · 89 citations
6. AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM AgentsConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Yiqiao Jin, Qinlin Zhao, Yiyang Wang, et al.2024 · 86 citations
7. MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific PapersarXiv:2401.04259Mike D'Arcy, Tom Hope, Larry Birnbaum, et al.2024 · 76 citations
8. Is LLM a Reliable Reviewer? A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM on Automatic Paper Reviewing TasksLanguage Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)Ruiyang Zhou, Lu Chen, Kai Yu2024 · 74 citations
9. LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)ReviewingConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Jiangshu Du, Yibo Wang, Wenting Zhao, et al.2024 · 71 citations
10. CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated ReviewarXiv:2411.00816Yixuan Weng, Minjun Zhu, Guangsheng Bao, et al.2024 · 65 citations
11. Reviewer2: Optimizing Review Generation Through Prompt GenerationarXiv:2402.10886Zhaolin Gao, Kiante Brantley, Thorsten Joachims2024 · 27 citations
12. Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and EvaluationACM Computing SurveysSteffen Eger, Yong Cao, Jennifer D'Souza, et al.2025 · 25 citations
13. AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific ResearchScience China Information SciencesQiguang Chen, Mingda Yang, Libo Qin, et al.2025 · 21 citations
14. TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer ReviewConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Yuan Chang, Ziyue Li, Hengyuan Zhang, et al.2025 · 16 citations
15. Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM ReviewsConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Hyungyu Shin, Jingyu Tang, Yoonjoo Lee, et al.2025 · 14 citations
16. Can LLMs Identify Critical Limitations within Scientific Research? A Systematic Evaluation on AI Research PapersAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Zhijian Xu, Yilun Zhao, Manasi Patwardhan, et al.2025 · 11 citations
17. Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 ExperimentarXiv:2411.03417Alexander Goldberg, Ihsan Ullah, Thanh Gia Hieu Khuong, et al.2024 · 10 citations
18. Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer ReviewsFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsSai Suresh Macharla Vasu, Ivaxi Sheth, Hui-Po Wang, et al.2026 · 8 citations
19. Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic EvaluationarXiv:2505.23824Tianmai M. Zhang, Neil F. Abernethy2025 · 7 citations
20. Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation FrameworkTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)Nils Dycke, Iryna Gurevych2026 · 5 citations
21. NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty AssessmentFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsWenqing Wu, Yi Zhao, Yuzhuo Wang, et al.2026 · 4 citations
22. AiraXiv: An AI-Driven Open-Access Platform for Human and AI ScientistsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Junshu Pan, Panzhong Lu, Yixuan Weng, et al.2026 · 1 citation
23. Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the FutureAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Sihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 1 citation
24. PaperMentor: A Human-Centered Multi-Agent Writing Tutor for AI Research Papers in OverleafAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Jiarui Liu, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Ryan Faulkner, et al.2026 · 1 citation
25. SEFL: A Framework for Generating Synthetic Educational Assignment Feedback with LLM AgentsLanguage Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)Mike Zhang, Amalie Pernille Dilling, Léon Gondelman, et al.2026 · 1 citation
26. ARAMIS: a web tool integrated with an open-source LLM to support grading undergraduate theses (ARAMIS: Uma ferramenta web integrada com LLM open-source para apoio à correção de TCCs de estudantes de graduação)International Conference on Computational Processing of PortugueseGustavo Campelo de Sousa, Pablo Kauan Martins Timbó, Luiz Zairo Bastos Viana, et al.2026
27. Reward Modeling for Scientific Writing EvaluationAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Furkan Şahinuç, Subhabrata Dutta, Iryna Gurevych2026

62 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/liang-2023-large-language-models-provide/cited-by/