🔗 Who cites «CheckEval: A reliable LLM-as-a-Judge framework for evaluating text generation using checklists»

26 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 5 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «CheckEval: A reliable LLM-as-a-Judge framework for evaluating text generation using checklists»

1. Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and EvaluationACM Computing SurveysSteffen Eger, Yong Cao, Jennifer D'Souza, et al.2025 · 25 citations
2. RubricBench: Aligning Model-Generated Rubrics with Human StandardsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Junyi Zhou, Qiyuan Zhang, Yufei Wang, et al.2026 · 3 citations
3. AnalystBench: Benchmarking professional long-form report generation with web-mined multimodal tasksFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsChau Minh Pham, Zichao Wang, Puneet Mathur, et al.2026
4. Child-directed speech facilitates production, not comprehension, in BabyLMsConference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL)Bastian Bunzeck, Sina Zarrieß2026
5. Evaluation Pitfalls and Sparsity Limitations in LLM-based Confidence Estimates for ClassificationFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsElena Merdjanovska, Omar Zaidan, Andreas Rücklé2026

21 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lee-2025-checkeval-reliable-llm-as-judge/cited-by/