🔗 Who cites «MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Papers»

68 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 23 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Papers»

1. The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific DiscoveryarXiv:2408.06292Chris Lu, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange, et al.2024 · 372 citations
2. Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP ResearchersarXiv:2409.04109Chenglei Si, Diyi Yang, Tatsunori Hashimoto2024 · 196 citations
3. Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research AssistantsarXiv:2501.04227Samuel Schmidgall, Yusheng Su, Ze Wang, et al.2025 · 139 citations
4. Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMsarXiv:2501.06322Khanh-Tung Tran, Dung Dao, Minh-Duong Nguyen, et al.2025 · 95 citations
5. AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM AgentsConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Yiqiao Jin, Qinlin Zhao, Yiyang Wang, et al.2024 · 86 citations
6. CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated ReviewarXiv:2411.00816Yixuan Weng, Minjun Zhu, Guangsheng Bao, et al.2024 · 65 citations
7. ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer ReviewsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Mike D'Arcy, Alexis Ross, Erin Bransom, et al.2024 · 32 citations
8. Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and EvaluationACM Computing SurveysSteffen Eger, Yong Cao, Jennifer D'Souza, et al.2025 · 25 citations
9. AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific ResearchScience China Information SciencesQiguang Chen, Mingda Yang, Libo Qin, et al.2025 · 21 citations
10. TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer ReviewConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Yuan Chang, Ziyue Li, Hengyuan Zhang, et al.2025 · 16 citations
11. Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM ReviewsConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Hyungyu Shin, Jingyu Tang, Yoonjoo Lee, et al.2025 · 14 citations
12. Can LLMs Identify Critical Limitations within Scientific Research? A Systematic Evaluation on AI Research PapersAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Zhijian Xu, Yilun Zhao, Manasi Patwardhan, et al.2025 · 11 citations
13. Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 ExperimentarXiv:2411.03417Alexander Goldberg, Ihsan Ullah, Thanh Gia Hieu Khuong, et al.2024 · 10 citations
14. AbGen: Evaluating Large Language Models in Ablation Study Design and Evaluation for Scientific ResearchAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Yilun Zhao, Weiyuan Chen, Zhijian Xu, et al.2025 · 9 citations
15. Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic EvaluationarXiv:2505.23824Tianmai M. Zhang, Neil F. Abernethy2025 · 7 citations
16. Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation FrameworkTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)Nils Dycke, Iryna Gurevych2026 · 5 citations
17. Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response AssistanceAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Qianli Ma, Chang Guo, Zhiheng Tian, et al.2026 · 5 citations
18. NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty AssessmentFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsWenqing Wu, Yi Zhao, Yuzhuo Wang, et al.2026 · 4 citations
19. RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback GenerationFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsSihong Wu, Yiling Ma, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 2 citations
20. Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the FutureAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Sihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 1 citation
21. PaperMentor: A Human-Centered Multi-Agent Writing Tutor for AI Research Papers in OverleafAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Jiarui Liu, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Ryan Faulkner, et al.2026 · 1 citation
22. ARAMIS: a web tool integrated with an open-source LLM to support grading undergraduate theses (ARAMIS: Uma ferramenta web integrada com LLM open-source para apoio à correção de TCCs de estudantes de graduação)International Conference on Computational Processing of PortugueseGustavo Campelo de Sousa, Pablo Kauan Martins Timbó, Luiz Zairo Bastos Viana, et al.2026
23. Preference Optimization for Review Question Generation Improves Writing QualityFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsKarun Sharma, Vidushee Vats, Shengzhi LI, et al.2026

45 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/arcy-2024-marg-multi-agent-review/cited-by/