Vidhisha Balachandran
Vidhisha Balachandran has 4 papers in our library, in 2021–2024, most of them on Evaluation & benchmarks, Summarization, Text generation; often with Yulia Tsvetkov, Akari Asai, Antonios Anastasopoulos.
OpenAlex · ORCID · Wikidata · h-index 10 · 71 works · 540 citations OpenAlex, 2026-10-14
📄 4 works in our library · 🔗 593 citations in our library · 6 more in our library without a page yet · ⭐ Paper Star rank #2851
Affiliations
Concepts, shelves and topics
📚 Shelves 10 Computer Science · 4 works Artificial Intelligence · 4 works Arts and Humanities · 3 works Language and Linguistics · 3 works Social Sciences · 2 works Medicine · 1 work Sociology and Political Science · 1 work Safety Research · 1 work Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 1 work Health Informatics · 1 work
🧭 Topics 4 Evaluation & benchmarks · 2 works Summarization · 1 work Text generation · 1 work Reasoning · 1 work
Works by year
2020s
Papers
- Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metrics (2021 · 418 citations)
Neural abstractive summarizers write fluent text that often misstates facts from the source. Existing factuality metrics could not be compared because there was no shared benchmark, and they all reduce factuality to a yes/no label for a whole summary. - Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Models (2024 · 96 citations)
Language models frequently state false facts. Most existing checkers give only a yes/no verdict for an entire response, so every error is treated the same way. The authors argue that factual mistakes come in distinct kinds, each requiring a different amount of verification effort, and they organize these kinds into a… - Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Survey (2023 · 87 citations)
Much has been written about the dangers of large text generators, but practical ways to counter them were scattered across separate research communities. - MediQ: Question-Asking LLMs and a Benchmark for Reliable Interactive Clinical Reasoning (2024 · 70 citations)
Most medical QA benchmarks give the model the whole case at once. Real consultations are different: patients often leave out details, and a clinician has to ask follow-up questions before deciding. The authors argue that LLMs are tuned to answer no matter what, which makes them unreliable when the context is…
Also in our library
Co-authors here
- Yulia Tsvetkov ×4
- Akari Asai
- Antonios Anastasopoulos
- Graham Neubig
- Hannaneh Hajishirzi
- Pang Wei Koh
- Sachin Kumar
- Shangbin Feng
- Yizhong Wang
Cited by
Updated
This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/vidhisha-balachandran/