A Rule-Based System for Unrestricted Bridging Resolution: Recognizing Bridging Anaphora and Finding Links to Antecedents
Summary
Bridging resolution links an anaphor to an antecedent that it relates to without referring to the same entity, such as a shuttle and its astronauts. Earlier work usually handled only one subtask at a time, either spotting anaphors or choosing antecedents. It also often restricted anaphors to definite NPs or relations to meronymy. This paper tackles the full, unrestricted problem end to end. The authors design eight linguistically motivated rules:
- relational nouns, such as building parts and roles,
- set membership,
- links inspired by implicit semantic role labeling.
Each rule has its own candidate window, tuned on ten development documents. The data is ISNotes, a reliably annotated subset of OntoNotes WSJ texts. The rule system clearly beats a reimplementation of Vieira and Poesio (2000). It also edges out a learner that uses the same knowledge resources. Adding the rules and richer features to the learner improves results only marginally. The authors explain this by the many different bridging relations, which leave little training data per type. The work is presented as the first system for unrestricted bridging in a realistic setting.
Key points
- Data: ISNotes covers 50 WSJ texts from OntoNotes, with about 11,000 NPs and 663 bridging anaphors.
- Only 38.5% of anaphors are definite and 44.9% have no determiner.
- 79% of relations fall into the "other" category, versus 14% part-of/attribute-of and 7% set.
- Distance: 29% of anaphors have antecedents three or more sentences back.
- Rule system: ruleSystem reaches R 11.9, P 42.9, F 18.6. The Vieira & Poesio baseline gets F 4.8, a significant gap (p < 0.01, randomization test).
- Learning-based variants:
- mlSystem ruleFeats: F 18.0
- mlSystem ruleFeats+atomFeats: F 18.7
- mlSystem atomFeats (no rule features): F 13.5
- Error pattern: The learners have higher recall but lower precision. They often find the right anaphor but choose the wrong antecedent.
Cited by
- ChEMU-Ref: A Corpus for Modeling Anaphora Resolution in the Chemical Domain
- What does it take to bake a cake? The RecipeRef corpus and anaphora resolution in procedural text
- Experiments on bridging across languages and genres
- A Deterministic Algorithm for Bridging Anaphora Resolution
- Bridging Anaphora Resolution as Question Answering
- Fine-grained Information Status Classification Using Discourse Context-Aware BERT
- Bridging Resolution: A Survey of the State of the Art
- Bridging Resolution: Making Sense of the State of the Art
- Bridging resolution: Task definition, corpus resources and rule-based experiments
- Integrating Predictions from Neural-Network Relation Classifiers into Coreference and Bridging Resolution
- Rule- and Learning-based Methods for Bridging Resolution in the ARRAU Corpus
- Multitask Learning-Based Neural Bridging Reference Resolution
Cite
@inproceedings{hou2014rule,
title = {{A Rule-Based System for Unrestricted Bridging Resolution: Recognizing Bridging Anaphora and Finding Links to Antecedents}},
author = {Hou, Yufang and Markert, Katja and Strube, Michael},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)},
year = {2014},
doi = {10.3115/v1/d14-1222},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/d14-1222}
}References
- Nicholas Asher and Alex Lascarides. 1998. Bridging. Journal of Semantics, 15:83–113. find
- Razvan Bunescu. 2003. Associative anaphora resolution: A Web-based approach. In Proceedings of the EACL 2003 Workshop on The Computational Treatment of Anaphora, Budapest, Hungary, 14 April, 2003, pages 47–52. find
- Aoife Cahill and Arndt Riester. 2012. Automatically acquiring fine-grained information status distinctions in German. In Proceedings of the SIGdial 2012 Conference: The 13th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, Seoul, Korea, 5–6 July 2012, pages 232–236. find
- Philipp Cimiano. 2006. Ingredients of a first-order account of bridging. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Inference in Computational Semantics, Buxton, U.K., 20–21 April 2006, pages 139–144. find
- Herbert H. Clark. 1975. Bridging. In Proceedings of the Conference on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge, Mass., June 1975, pages 169–174. find
- Jeanette K. Gundel, Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69:274–307. find
- John A. Hawkins. 1978. Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, N.J. find
- Yufang Hou, Katja Markert, and Michael Strube. 2013a. Cascading collective classification for bridging anaphora recognition using a rich linguistic feature set. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Seattle, Wash., 18–21 October 2013, pages 814– 8… find our card
- Yufang Hou, Katja Markert, and Michael Strube. 2013b. Global inference for bridging anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Atlanta, Georgia, 9–14 June 2013, pages 907–917. find our card
- Egoitz Laparra and German Rigau. 2013. ImpAr: A deterministic algorithm for implicit semantic role labelling. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, Bulgaria, 4–9 August 2013, pages 1180– 1189. find
- Emmanuel Lassalle and Pascal Denis. 2011. Leveraging different meronym discovery methods for bridging resolution in French. In Proceedings of the 8th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC 2011), Faro, Algarve, Portugal, 6– 7 October 2011, pages 35–46. find
- Sebastian Löbner. 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics, 4:279–326. find
- Sebastian Löbner. 1998. Definite associative anaphora. Unpublished Manuscript, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf. find
- Katja Markert, Malvina Nissim, and Natalia N. Modjeska. 2003. Using the web for nominal anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on the Computational Treatment of Anaphora. Budapest, Hungary, 14 April 2003, pages 39–46. find
- Katja Markert, Yufang Hou, and Michael Strube. 2012. Collective classification for fine-grained information status. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jeju Island, Korea, 8–14 July 2012, pages 795–804. find our card
- Adam Meyers, Ruth Reeves, Catherine Macleod, Rachel Szekely, Veronika Zielinska, Brian Young, and Ralph Grishaman. 2004. Annotating noun argument structure for NomBank. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal, 26–28 May 2004, pages 80… find
- Natalia M. Modjeska, Katja Markert, and Malvina Nissim. 2003. Using the web in machine learning for other-anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Sapporo, Japan, 11–12 July 2003, pages 176–183. find our card
- Vincent Ng and Claire Cardie. 2002. Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, Penn., 7–12 July 2002, pages 104–111. find our card
- Robert Parker, David Graff, Junbo Kong, Ke Chen, and Kazuaki Maeda. 2011. English Gigaword Fifth Edition. LDC2011T07. find
- Massimo Poesio and Renata Vieira. 1998. A corpus-based investigation of definite description use. Computational Linguistics, 24(2):183–216. find
- Massimo Poesio, Renata Vieira, and Simone Teufel. 1997. Resolving bridging references in unrestricted text. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution for Unrestricted Text, Madrid, Spain, July 1997, pages 1–6. find our card
- Massimo Poesio, Rahul Mehta, Axel Maroudas, and Janet Hitzeman. 2004. Learning to resolve bridging references. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, 21–26 July 2004, pages 143–150. find our card
- Ellen F. Prince. 1981. Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole, editor, Radical Pragmatics, pages 223–255. Academic Press, New York, N.Y. find
- Ellen F. Prince. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In W.C. Mann and S.A. Thompson, editors, Discourse Description. Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, pages 295–325. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. find
- Altaf Rahman and Vincent Ng. 2012. Learning the fine-grained information status of discourse entities. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Avignon, France, 23–27 April 2012, pages 798–807. find
- Ina Rösiger and Simone Teufel. 2014. Resolving coreference and associative noun phrases in scientific text. In Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop at the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Gothenburg, Sweden, 26–30 April 2014, pages 44… find
- Wee Meng Soon, Hwee Tou Ng, and Daniel Chung Yong Lim. 2001. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics, 27(4):521–544. find our card
- Philip J. Stone, Dexter C. Dunphy, Marshall S. Smith, Daniel M. Ogilvie, and Cambridge Computer Associates. 1966. General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. find
- Renata Vieira and Massimo Poesio. 2000. An empirically-based system for processing definite descriptions. Computational Linguistics, 26(4):539– 593. find
- Ralph Weischedel, Martha Palmer, Mitchell Marcus, Eduard Hovy, Sameer Pradhan, Lance Ramshaw, Nianwen Xue, Ann Taylor, Jeff Kaufman, Michelle Franchini, Mohammed El-Bachouti, Robert Belvin, and Ann Houston. 2011. OntoNotes release 4.0. LDC2011T03, Philadelphia, Penn.: Linguistic Data Consortium. find
This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/hou-2014-rule-based-system-unrestricted-bridging/