Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2025 / Motivational adaptation in English grammar learning: a mixed-methods study of students during the transition to senior high school

Motivational adaptation in English grammar learning: a mixed-methods study of students during the transition to senior high school

Paper · 2025 · Zhuojun Zhuang and Di Wang

Summary

This is an educational-psychology study, not an NLP paper. It asks how Chinese students' motivation for English grammar shifts when they move from junior to senior high school, where grammar suddenly becomes harder. The authors use expectancy-value theory (EVT) and a mixed-methods design. One class of first-year senior students filled in the same questionnaire at the start and end of a semester, and a small subset was interviewed afterwards. By the end of the semester, students showed significant gains in three areas: how much they enjoyed grammar for its own sake, how useful they judged it to be, and how confident they felt about succeeding at it. Attainment value and perceived task difficulty did not change much. The interviews pointed to four drivers of adaptation:

  • how students feel about grammar,
  • how much harder they perceive it to be,
  • targeted support from the teacher,
  • their sense of self-worth.

The authors argue that carefully designed grammar teaching can make the psychological side of a demanding school transition smoother. They also draw lessons for teacher training.

Key points

  • Framework: EVT (Eccles and Wigfield). The constructs measured are intrinsic value, utility value, attainment value, expectancies for success and perceived task difficulty.
  • Design: questionnaires before and after one semester (80 participants), followed by interviews with six students. All participants came from a single class with the same teacher.
  • Results: three constructs increased significantly. Attainment value and perceived difficulty stayed roughly flat.
  • Context from the literature: Chang et al. (2021) surveyed 392 teachers across 26 provinces, and 55.87% of them saw real problems in the junior-to-senior curriculum handoff. Li et al. (2024) link difficulty with English tense to Chinese lacking grammatical tense.
  • Limitations stated by the authors: small single-class sample, only one semester, and no comparison of subgroups (for example, high versus low achievers).

Interesting ideas

  • I1. The study measures several constructs on the same cohort before and after, and reports which ones did not move alongside those that did, so the stable measures act as a sanity check against a global drift.
  • I2. Numbers show what changed, and a few targeted interviews explain why; the qualitative part is used to account for the quantitative shifts.
  • I3. Instructional support is given first and then gradually withdrawn as the learner gains confidence and starts applying concepts alone.
  • I4. The authors note a mismatch between how good strong students think they are and how good they actually are, and they correct it with specific, process-oriented feedback.
  • I5. The authors regret not splitting results by achievement level, because averages can hide different patterns.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (learn): Regression reports could pair each metric we expect to improve with metrics that should stay flat, so a broad, unexplained shift is flagged rather than celebrated.
  • I2 (learn): After an evaluation shift, a handful of changed cases could be traced step by step through tree, frames and world, giving a causal story behind the score.
  • I3 (learn): LLM teacher tiers could follow this fade-out schedule, with heavy teacher labels on new grammar phenomena and less teacher input as silver agreement from the witness parsers grows.
  • I4 (answer): Readers could log their confidence per test item and compare it with actual correctness, giving calibration feedback tied to the reasoning step that failed instead of only an overall score.
  • I5 (answer): School-course test results could be broken down by item difficulty tier, such as junior-level versus senior-level grammar, so a gain on easy items cannot mask a loss on hard ones.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

🎓Shanghai International Studies UniversityShanghai · China3 works · 29 citations

 Fields, topics and concepts

📚 Shelves 5The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 17,450 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 17,296 worksPsychology · 1,649 worksExperimental and Cognitive Psychology · 930 worksSocial Psychology · 330 works

🧭 Topics 1Research subjects and languages the work is about.English · 2,379 works

Cite

Cite as Zhuojun Zhuang and Di Wang. 2025. Motivational adaptation in English grammar learning: a mixed-methods study of students during the transition to senior high school. Frontiers in Psychology 16.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1703576

@inproceedings{zhuang2025motivational,
  title = {{Motivational adaptation in English grammar learning: a mixed-methods study of students during the transition to senior high school}},
  author = {Zhuojun Zhuang and Di Wang},
  booktitle = {Frontiers in Psychology 16},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1703576},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1703576}
}

References

54 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Akos, P., and Galassi, J. P. (2004). Middle and high school transitions as viewed by students, parents, and teachers. Prof. Sch. Couns. 7, 212–221. Available online at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42732584 ↗
  2. Garner, J., and Moots, S. C. (2018). Measuring well-being as students transition between schools: the validation of the quality of transition instrument. J. At-Risk Issues 21, 1–12. Available online at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1199050.pdf ↗
  3. Alspaugh, J. W. (1998). Achievement loss associated with the transition to middle school and high school. J. Educ. Res. 92, 20–25. doi: 10.1080/00220679809597572 ↗
  4. Guo, J., Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., and Morin, A. J. (2015). Achievement, motivation, and educational choices: a longitudinal study of expectancy and value using a multiplicative perspective. Dev. Psychol. 51, 1163–1176. doi: 10.1037/a0039440 ↗
  5. Arens, A. K., Schmidt, I., and Preckel, F. (2019). Longitudinal relations among self-concept, intrinsic value, and attainment value across secondary school years in three academic domains. J. Educ. Psychol. 111, 663–684. doi: 10.1037/edu0000313 ↗
  6. Hirsch, B. J., and DuBois, D. L. (1992). The relation of peer social support and psychological symptomatology during the transition to junior high school: a two-year longitudinal analysis. Am. J. Community Psychol. 20, 333–347. doi: 10.1007/BF00937913 ↗
  7. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychol. Rev. 64, 359–372. doi: 10.1037/h0043445 ↗
  8. Iacobescu, N., Sava, S., and Luștrea, A. (2024). Teachers’ perspectives and approaches on the transition to high school. Stud. Educ. Adults 56, 191–208. doi: 10.1080/02660830.2024.2408771 ↗
  9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. find
  10. Barber, B. K., and Olsen, J. A. (2004). Assessing the transitions to middle and high school. J. Adolesc. Res. 19, 3–30. doi: 10.1177/0743558403258113 ↗
  11. Isakson, K., and Jarvis, P. (1999). The adjustment of adolescents during the transition into high school: a short-term longitudinal study. J. Youth Adolesc. 28, 1–26. doi: 10.1023/A:1021616407189 ↗
  12. Bargmann, C., Thiele, L., and Kauffeld, S. (2022). Motivation matters: predicting students’ career decidedness and intention to drop out after the first year in higher education. High. Educ. 83, 845–861. doi: 10.1007/s10734-021-00707-6 ↗
  13. Kinney, D. A. (1993). From nerds to normals: the recovery of identity among adolescents from middle school to high school. Sociol. Educ. 66, 21–40. doi: 10.2307/2112783 ↗
  14. Barone, C., Aguirre-Deandreis, A. I., and Trickett, E. J. (1991). Means-ends problem-solving skills, life stress, and social support as mediators of adjustment in the normative transition to high school. Am. J. Community Psychol. 19, 207–225. doi: 10.1007/BF00937928 ↗
  15. Köller, O., Baumert, J., and Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. J. Res. Math. Educ. 32, 448–470. doi: 10.2307/749801 ↗
  16. Benner, A. D. (2011). The transition to high school: current knowledge, future directions. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 23, 299–328. doi: 10.1007/s10648-011-9152-0 ↗
  17. Lazarides, R., Schiepe-Tiska, A., Heine, J. H., and Buchholz, J. (2022). Expectancy-value profiles in math: how are student-perceived teaching behaviors related to motivational transitions? Learn. Individ. Differ. 98:102198. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102198 ↗
  18. Benner, A. D., Boyle, A. E., and Bakhtiari, F. (2017). Understanding students’ transition to high school: demographic variation and the role of supportive relationships. J. Youth Adolesc. 46, 2129–2142. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0716-2 ↗
  19. Li, M. (2025). The transition of talent cultivation objectives in China’s English curriculum standards and teaching guidelines: a foreign language education studies perspective. Foreign Lang. Educ. China 8, 34–44. doi: 10.20083/j.cnki.fleic.2025.0005 ↗
  20. Benner, A. D., and Graham, S. (2009). The transition to high school as a developmental process among multiethnic urban youth. Child Dev. 80, 356–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01265.x ↗
  21. Li, Y., Casaponsa, A., Jones, M., and Thierry, G. (2024). Chinese learners of English are conceptually blind to temporal differences conveyed by tense. Lang. Learn. 74, 184–217. doi: 10.1111/lang.12584 ↗
  22. Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: a practical guide. London: SAGE Publications. ↗
  23. Lin, Z., and Jia, L. (2015). A probe into English grammar teaching innovation. Foreign Lang. Learn. Theory Pract.. 3, 57–62+98+96. Available online at: https://kns.cnki.net/ kcms2/article/abstract?v=lqoStndJ5wGzSZg1PEH1s_5zAIg4Njco9b_swzzENM2OM6-h9q5rj3brmkWI6MIZCmlaA8L99ft-TVb1oZFlGWPOjZhbhw6LW4wANqJnIpR4Z2G 4Lngq32WZXMorbWWDVaAJOwSm8pE01b3la-m5ERSONGfrXhe8um6cMbcEUmK Jhoqtm5EANw==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Q. 25, 459–480. doi: 10.2307/3586980 ↗
  24. Chang, J., Huang, J., Liu, X., Qin, L., Xia, Y., Zhao, X., et al 2021). Key problems in the curriculum design and implementation of foreign language education in the development of FLES discipline in China. Foreign Lang. Teach.. (1), 30–37+145. doi: doi: 10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004741 ↗
  25. Liu, G., Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, S., and Cheng, G. (2023). The trajectory of subjective social status and its influencing factors in the transition period of freshmen in senior high school. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 148:106884. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106884 ↗
  26. Chen, C., Lee, S. Y., and Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among east Asian and north American students. Psychol. Sci. 6, 170–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x ↗
  27. Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., and Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology 4, 73–79. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73 ↗
  28. Cheng, X. (2020). Zhongxue Yingyu Yufa Jiaoxuezhong de Jige Tuchu Wenti [The prominent issues in teaching English grammar in secondary schools]. Teach. Res. Prim. Mid. Sch. 4, 3–8+33. Available online at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v= l q o S t n d J 5 w F t V F H 9 C J F i E _ A x 9 g s v m 6 E d R R f a 9 O D V 9 S u o n r Z 1 Ym 1 g K V PA m 2 i 0 T F 8 j C M Kw F P M c 1 P l L o 8 l N f w q Ts P Z x v Ya k c g c 5 Ya q f _ I0OH7FOpvptpm1ZGMxO7CC6Hox6uvgoQhm879QK5HR08KDIhC5jni2houPx Lnm18s50hdgx8GJD4fp7Sw==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS Mac Iver, M. A., and Messel, M. (2013). The ABCs of keeping on track to graduation: research findings from Baltimore. J. Educ. Stud. Placed Risk (JESPAR) 18, 50–67. doi: 10.1080/10824669.2013.745207 ↗
  29. Mayerhofer, M., Lüftenegger, M., and Eichmair, M. (2024). The development of mathematics expectancy-value profiles during the secondary–tertiary transition into STEM fields. Int. J. STEM Educ. 11, 31–51. doi: 10.1186/s40594-024-00491-6 ↗
  30. Council of Europe (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment—Companion Volume. Council of Europe Publishing. Available online at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages (Accessed November 1, 2025). ↗
  31. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2020). Putong Gaozhong Yingyu Kecheng Biaozhun [English curriculum standards for general senior high schools]. Beijing: People’s Education Press. find
  32. Denissen, J. J., Zarrett, N. R., and Eccles, J. S. (2007). I like to do it, I’m able, and I know I am: longitudinal couplings between domain-specific achievement, self-concept, and interest. Child Dev. 78, 430–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01007.x ↗
  33. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2022). Yiwu Jiaoyu Yingyu Kecheng Biaozhun [English curriculum standards for compulsory education]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing Group. find
  34. Dong, L., Liu, M., and Yang, F. (2022). The relationship between foreign language classroom anxiety, enjoyment, and expectancy-value motivation and their predictive effects on Chinese high school students’ self-rated foreign language proficiency. Front. Psychol. 13:860603. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.860603 ↗
  35. Mori, S., and Gobel, P. (2006). Motivation and gender in the Japanese EFL classroom. System 34, 194–210. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.11.002 ↗
  36. Nagle, C. (2021). Using expectancy value theory to understand motivation, persistence, and achievement in university-level foreign language learning. Foreign Lang. Ann. 54, 1238–1256. doi: 10.1111/flan.12569 ↗
  37. Durik, A. M., Vida, M., and Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: a developmental analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 98, 382–393. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.382 ↗
  38. Newman, B. M., Newman, P. R., Griffen, S., O’Connor, K., and Spas, J. (2007). The relationship of social support to depressive symptoms during the transition to high school. Adolescence 42, 441–459. Available online at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18047232/ Eccles, J. S. (1983). “Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors” in Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches. ed. J. T. Spence (San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman), 75–146. ↗
  39. Nicoladis, E., Yuehan, Y., and Jiang, Z. (2020). Whyjumpedis so difficult: tense/aspect marking in mandarin–English bilingual children. J. Child Lang. 47, 1073–1083. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000082 ↗
  40. Eccles, J. S., and Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 109–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 ↗
  41. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. find
  42. Ellis, B. J., and Del Giudice, M. (2019). Developmental adaptation to stress: an evolutionary perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 70, 111–139. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011732 ↗
  43. Song, L., and Dong, X. (2015). Gaozhong Yingyu Yufa Jiaoxugaige Tansuo [An exploration of English grammar teaching reform in senior high schools]. Theory Pract. Educ 35, 58–60. Available online at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/ abstract?v=lqoStndJ5wHNCE9s_KQxdYeaZxlm17RCG0sbOKA4jAXrM548D0iH cUu9Ho4hb_By1RGL454SFC_zgb9r9LDMSN6ioPFb7XYBBjU5gLBc92PTY DFhdE4371TVNyWALbEawlnr8NjzJyh9LcbxYemW_ob238xj-MvSbRFUROOypVqtb Bua5GwAQA==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS Felner, R. D., Primavera, J., and Cauce, A. M. (1981). The impact of school transitions: a focus for preventive efforts. Am. J. Community Psychol. 9, 449–459. doi: 10.1007/BF00918175 ↗
  44. Fischoff, B., Goitein, B., and Shapira, Z. (1982). “The experienced utility of expected utility approaches” in Expectations and actions: expectancy-value models in psychology. ed. N. T. Feather (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 315–339. perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Dev. Psychol. 27, 552–565. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.4.552 ↗
  45. Suldo, S. M., Storey, E. D., O’Brennan, L. M., Shaunessy-Dedrick, E., Ferron, J. M., Dedrick, R. F., et al. (2019). Identifying high school freshmen with signs of emotional or academic risk: screening methods appropriate for students in accelerated courses. Sch. Ment. Health 11, 210–227. doi: 10.1007/s12310-018-9297-9 ↗
  46. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J. A., Freedman-Doan, C., et al. (1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: a 3-year study. J. Educ. Psychol. 89, 451–469. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451 ↗
  47. Tang, X., Lee, H. R., Wan, S., Gaspard, H., and Salmela-Aro, K. (2022). Situating expectancies and subjective task values across grade levels, domains, and countries: a network approach. AERA Open 8:23328584221117168. doi: 10.1177/23328584221117168 ↗
  48. Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., and Klauda, S. L. (2009). “Expectancy-value theory” in Handbook of motivation at school. eds. K. R. Wenzel and A. Wigfield (New York: Routledge), 55–75. find
  49. Wang, Q., and Xue, M. (2022). The implications of expectancy-value theory of motivation in language education. Front. Psychol. 13:992372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992372 ↗
  50. Weiss, C. C. (2001). Difficult starts: turbulence in the school year and its impact on urban students’ achievement. Am. J. Educ. 109, 196–227. doi: 10.1086/444266 ↗
  51. Wu, C. (2017). School English curriculum connection from the perspective of course system. Curr. Teach. Mater. Method. 37, 71–77. doi: 10.19877/j.cnki. kcjcjf.2017.12.012 ↗
  52. Wigfield, A., and Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 68–81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015 ↗
  53. You, C., and Dörnyei, Z. (2016). Language learning motivation in China: results of a large-scale stratified survey. Appl. Linguist. 37, 495–519. doi: 10.1093/ applin/amu046 find
  54. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Mac Iver, D., Reuman, D. A., and Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions during early adolescence: changes in children’s domain-specific self- find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhuang-2026-motivational-adaptation-english-grammar-learning/