Over-Searching in Search-Augmented Large Language Models
Paper · 2026 · Roy Xie, Deepak Gopinath, David Qiu et al.
Summary
Search-augmented LLMs can call a search tool even when doing so offers no benefit, such as when the answer is already within the model's knowledge or when no answer exists for the question. The authors call this over-searching. It wastes compute and can mislead the model with irrelevant context. They study it systematically across:
- three kinds of unanswerable queries: Answer Unknown, False Premise and Underspecified Context;
- base, reasoning and deep research models;
- local RAG versus web search;
- single- and multi-turn dialogue.
The queries come from existing benchmarks, each paired with an answerable counterpart, and form the released OverSearchQA benchmark. Systems are scored on answer accuracy for answerable questions and abstention accuracy for unanswerable ones. A new cost metric, Tokens Per Correctness (TPC), measures compute spent per correct response.
Searching raises answer accuracy but erodes the ability to abstain. The problem is strongest in reasoning models, under noisy retrieval and over long conversations. Retrieved negative evidence helps models abstain. Prompting and corpus-level fixes help only partly, so the authors suggest the root problem may need post-training solutions.
Key points
- TPC divides total cost by the number of correct answers. Cost is generated tokens plus 0.25 × input tokens plus 500 per search call, with weights based on typical API pricing.
- With o4-mini, raising the search-turn cap from 0 to 19 has three effects:
- answer accuracy plateaus at around 7 searches;
- abstention accuracy keeps falling;
- TPC grows steadily.
- Seed datasets include CoCoNot, FalseQA, QAQA, KUQ, BigBench, ALCUNA, MediQ and WorldSense.
- Six models were tested, including GPT-4o-mini, Kimi-K2, Qwen3-235B-Instruct and Llama-3.3-70B. Averaged over these models, the baseline reaches 71.4% answer accuracy, 50.2% abstention accuracy and a TPC of 732.6.
- Mitigation results:
- Prompt-based methods (abstention-aware prompts, few-shot examples, self-evaluation) raise abstention by 11.5 points on average. Few-shot gives the largest gain but costs the most answer accuracy.
- Adding 10 synthetic negative-evidence documents per query to the corpus improves abstention by only 3.6 points.
Fields, topics and concepts
📚 Shelves 5The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Computer Science · 18,614 worksArtificial Intelligence · 17,965 worksArts and Humanities · 17,450 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 17,296 worksInformation Systems · 1,730 works
🧭 Topics 1Research subjects and languages the work is about.Language models & pretraining · 3,894 works
Cite
Cite as Roy Xie, Deepak Gopinath, David Qiu, Dong Lin, Haitian Sun, Saloni Potdar and Bhuwan Dhingra. 2026. Over-Searching in Search-Augmented Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers).
@inproceedings{xie2026over,
title = {{Over-Searching in Search-Augmented Large Language Models}},
author = {Roy Xie, Deepak Gopinath, David Qiu, Dong Lin, Haitian Sun, Saloni Potdar and Bhuwan Dhingra},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.18653/v1/2026.eacl-long.361},
url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.eacl-long.361}
}References
- Alfonso Amayuelas, Kyle Wong, Liangming Pan, Wenhu Chen, and William Yang Wang. 2024. Knowledge of knowledge: Exploring known-unknowns uncertainty with large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 6416–6432, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for C…
- Youssef Benchekroun, Megi Dervishi, Mark Ibrahim, Jean-Baptiste Gaya, Xavier Martinet, Grégoire Mialon, Thomas Scialom, Emmanuel Dupoux, Dieuwke Hupkes, and Pascal Vincent. 2023. Worldsense: A synthetic benchmark for grounded reasoning in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15930.
- Faeze Brahman, Sachin Kumar, Vidhisha Balachandran, Pradeep Dasigi, Valentina Pyatkin, Abhilasha Ravichander, Sarah Wiegreffe, Nouha Dziri, Khyathi Chandu, Jack Hessel, and 1 others. 2024. The art of saying no: Contextual noncompliance in language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Sy…
- Mingyang Chen, Tianpeng Li, Haoze Sun, Yijie Zhou, Chenzheng Zhu, Fan Yang, Zenan Zhou, Weipeng Chen, Haofen Wang, Jeff Z Pan, and 1 others. 2025. Learning to reason with search for llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19470.
- Wenhu Chen, Xueguang Ma, Xinyi Wang, and William W. Cohen. 2022. Program of thoughts prompting: Disentangling computation from reasoning for numerical reasoning tasks. find
- Trans. Mach. Learn. Res., 2023. find
- Mingyi Deng, Lijun Huang, Yani Fan, Jiayi Zhang, Fashen Ren, Jinyi Bai, Fuzhen Yang, Dayi Miao, Zhaoyang Yu, Yifan Wu, and 1 others. 2025. Inter-actcomp: Evaluating search agents with ambiguous queries. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24668. — [arXiv:2510.24668](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24668) find
- Mehmet Hamza Erol, Batu El, Mirac Suzgun, Mert Yuksekgonul, and James Zou. 2025. Cost-of-pass: An economic framework for evaluating language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13359. — [arXiv:2504.13359](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13359) find
- Chenrui Fan, Ming Li, Lichao Sun, and Tianyi Zhou. 2025. Missing premise exacerbates overthinking: Are reasoning models losing critical thinking skill? arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06514. — [arXiv:2504.06514](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06514) find
- Shangbin Feng, Weijia Shi, Yike Wang, Wenxuan Ding, Vidhisha Balachandran, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2024. Don’t hallucinate, abstain: Identifying LLM knowledge gaps via multi-LLM collaboration. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Pape… find
- Luyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon, Pengfei Liu, Yiming Yang, Jamie Callan, and Graham Neubig. 2022. Pal: Program-aided language models. ArXiv, abs/2211.10435. find
- Google. 2024. Gemini deep research. find
- Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Alex Vaughan, and 1 others. 2024. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783.
- Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, and 1 others. 2025. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948.
- Bairu Hou, Yang Zhang, Jiabao Ji, Yujian Liu, Kaizhi Qian, Jacob Andreas, and Shiyu Chang. 2025. Thinkprune: Pruning long chain-of-thought of llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01296.
- Shengding Hu, Yifan Luo, Huadong Wang, Xingyi Cheng, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2023. Won’t get fooled again: Answering questions with false premises. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 5626–5643, Toronto, Cana… find
- Aaron Hurst, Adam Lerer, Adam P Goucher, Adam Perelman, Aditya Ramesh, Aidan Clark, AJ Ostrow, Akila Welihinda, Alan Hayes, Alec Radford, and 1 others. 2024. Gpt-4o system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276.
- Aaron Jaech, Adam Kalai, Adam Lerer, Adam Richardson, Ahmed El-Kishky, Aiden Low, Alec Helyar, Aleksander Madry, Alex Beutel, Alex Carney, and 1 others. 2024. Openai o1 system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16720.
- Jiabao Ji, Min Li, Priyanshu Kumar, Shiyu Chang, and Saloni Potdar. 2025. Deepambigqa: Ambiguous multi-hop questions for benchmarking llm answer completeness. Preprint, arXiv:2511.01323. — [arXiv:2511.01323](https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01323) find
- Bowen Jin, Hansi Zeng, Zhenrui Yue, Jinsung Yoon, Sercan Arik, Dong Wang, Hamed Zamani, and Jiawei Han. 2025a. Search-r1: Training llms to reason and leverage search engines with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09516.
- Jiajie Jin, Yutao Zhu, Zhicheng Dou, Guanting Dong, Xinyu Yang, Chenghao Zhang, Tong Zhao, Zhao Yang, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2025b. Flashrag: A modular toolkit for efficient retrieval-augmented generation research. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, WWW 2025, Sydney, NSW, Australi…
- Kimi, Yifan Bai, Yiping Bao, Guanduo Chen, Jiahao Chen, Ningxin Chen, Ruijue Chen, Yanru Chen, Yuankun Chen, Yutian Chen, Zhuofu Chen, Jialei Cui, Hao Ding, Mengnan Dong, Angang Du, Chenzhuang Du, Dikang Du, Yulun Du, Yu Fan, and 150 others. 2025. Kimi k2: Open agentic intelligence. Preprint, arXiv:…
- Polina Kirichenko, Mark Ibrahim, Kamalika Chaudhuri, and Samuel J Bell. 2025. Abstentionbench: Reasoning llms fail on unanswerable questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09038. find
- Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Redfield, Michael Collins, Ankur Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Kenton Lee, Kristina Toutanova, Llion Jones, Matthew Kelcey, Ming-Wei Chang, Andrew M. Dai, Jakob Uszkoreit, Quoc Le, and Slav Petrov. 2019. Natural…
- Woosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng, Lianmin Zheng, Cody Hao Yu, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Hao Zhang, and Ion Stoica. 2023. Efficient memory management for large language model serving with pagedattention. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles.
- LangGraph. 2025. Langgraph. find
- Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, and 1 others. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:9459–…
- Stella Li, Vidhisha Balachandran, Shangbin Feng, Jonathan Ilgen, Emma Pierson, Pang Wei W Koh, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2024. Mediq: Question-asking llms and a benchmark for reliable interactive clinical reasoning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:28858–28888.
- Xiaoxi Li, Jiajie Jin, Guanting Dong, Hongjin Qian, Yutao Zhu, Yongkang Wu, Ji-Rong Wen, and Zhicheng Dou. 2025a. Webthinker: Empowering large reasoning models with deep research capability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21776.
- Adam Tauman Kalai, Ofir Nachum, Santosh S Vempala, and Edwin Zhang. 2025. Why language models hallucinate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.04664. — [arXiv:2509.04664](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04664) find
- Xuefeng Li, Haoyang Zou, and Pengfei Liu. 2025b. Torl: Scaling tool-integrated rl. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23383.
- Najoung Kim, Phu Mon Htut, Samuel R. Bowman, and Jackson Petty. 2023. (QA) 2 : Question answering with questionable assumptions. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8466–8487, Toronto, Canada. Association for Compu… find
- Nishanth Madhusudhan, Sathwik Tejaswi Madhusudhan, Vikas Yadav, and Masoud Hashemi. 2024. Do llms know when to not answer? investigating abstention abilities of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16221.
- Mistral. 2025. Mistral small 3. find
- OpenAI. 2025a. Deep research system card. find
- OpenAI. 2025b. Openai o3 and o4-mini system card. find
- Alicia Parrish, Angelica Chen, Nikita Nangia, Vishakh Padmakumar, Jason Phang, Jana Thompson, Phu Mon Htut, and Samuel Bowman. 2022. BBQ: A hand-built bias benchmark for question answering. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, pages 2086–2105, Dublin, Ireland. Asso…
- Xiao Pu, Michael Saxon, Wenyue Hua, and William Yang Wang. 2025. Thoughtterminator: Benchmarking, calibrating, and mitigating overthinking in reasoning models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13367. — [arXiv:2504.13367](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13367) find
- Joykirat Singh, Raghav Magazine, Yash Pandya, and Akshay Nambi. 2025. Agentic reasoning and tool integration for llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.01441. — [arXiv:2505.01441](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01441) find
- Huatong Song, Jinhao Jiang, Yingqian Min, Jie Chen, Zhipeng Chen, Wayne Xin Zhao, Lei Fang, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2025a. R1-searcher: Incentivizing the search capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05592.
- Linxin Song, Taiwei Shi, and Jieyu Zhao. 2025b. The hallucination tax of reinforcement finetuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13988. find
- Yang Sui, Yu-Neng Chuang, Guanchu Wang, Jiamu Zhang, Tianyi Zhang, Jiayi Yuan, Hongyi Liu, Andrew Wen, Shaochen Zhong, Hanjie Chen, and 1 others. 2025. Stop overthinking: A survey on efficient reasoning for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.16419.
- Ryan Teknium, Jeffrey Quesnelle, and Chen Guang. 2024. Hermes 3 technical report. Preprint, arXiv:2408.11857. — [arXiv:2408.11857](https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11857) find
- Christian Tomani, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Ivan Evtimov, Daniel Cremers, and Mark Ibrahim. 2024. Uncertainty-based abstention in llms improves safety and reduces hallucinations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10960. — [arXiv:2404.10960](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10960) find
- Jason Wei, Nguyen Karina, Hyung Won Chung, Yunxin Joy Jiao, Spencer Papay, Amelia Glaese, John Schulman, and William Fedus. 2024. Measuring short-form factuality in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04368.
- Bingbing Wen, Bill Howe, and Lucy Lu Wang. 2024. Characterizing LLM abstention behavior in science QA with context perturbations. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, pages 3437–3450, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
- Bingbing Wen, Jihan Yao, Shangbin Feng, Chenjun Xu, Yulia Tsvetkov, Bill Howe, and Lucy Lu Wang. 2025. Know your limits: A survey of abstention in large language models. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 13:529–556. find
- An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Chengen Huang, Chenxu Lv, Chujie Zheng, Dayiheng Liu, Fan Zhou, Fei Huang, Feng Hu, Hao Ge, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jialong Tang, and 41 others. 2025. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388.
- Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, Yoshua Bengio, William W Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christopher D Manning. 2018. Hotpotqa: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 236…
- Xunjian Yin, Baizhou Huang, and Xiaojun Wan. 2023a. ALCUNA: Large language models meet new knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1397–1414, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
- Zhangyue Yin, Qiushi Sun, Qipeng Guo, Jiawen Wu, Xipeng Qiu, and Xuanjing Huang. 2023b. Do large language models know what they don’t know? In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 8653–8665, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
- Bram Vanroy. 2025. Commoncrawl creativecommons corpus (c5). find
- Hongru Wang, Cheng Qian, Wanjun Zhong, Xiusi Chen, Jiahao Qiu, Shijue Huang, Bowen Jin, Mengdi Wang, Kam-Fai Wong, and Heng Ji. 2025. Acting less is reasoning more! teaching model to act efficiently. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.14870. — [arXiv:2504.14870](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14870) find
- Liang Wang, Nan Yang, Xiaolong Huang, Binxing Jiao, Linjun Yang, Daxin Jiang, Rangan Majumder, and Furu Wei. 2022. Text embeddings by weakly-supervised contrastive pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.03533.
Updated
This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/xie-2026-over-searching-search-augmented-large/