🔗 Who cites «OpinionFinder: A System for Subjectivity Analysis»

78 papers of our library cite it (of the 141,840 whose bibliographies we read) · 7 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «OpinionFinder: A System for Subjectivity Analysis»

1. Sarcasm as Contrast between a Positive Sentiment and Negative SituationEllen Riloff, Ashequl Qadir, Prafulla Surve, et al.2013 · 754 citations
   Identifying Sources of Opinions with Conditional Random Fields and Extraction PatternsHuman Language Technology Conference (HLT)Yejin Choi, Claire Cardie, Ellen Riloff, et al.2005 · 436 citations
   Phrase Dependency Parsing for Opinion MiningConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Yuanbin Wu, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang, et al.2009 · 423 citations
   Resolving Complex Cases of Definite Pronouns: The Winograd Schema ChallengeConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Altaf Rahman, Vincent Ng2012 · 242 citations
   Modality and Negation: An Introduction to the Special IssueComputational LinguisticsRoser Morante, Caroline Sporleder2012 · 205 citations
   Solving Hard Coreference ProblemsConference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL)Haoruo Peng, Daniel Khashabi, Dan Roth2015 · 118 citations
2. Really? Well. Apparently Bootstrapping Improves the Performance of Sarcasm and Nastiness Classifiers for Online DialogueProceedings of the Workshop on Language Analysis in Social MediaStephanie Lukin, Marilyn Walker2013 · 31 citations

71 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wilson-2005-opinionfinder-system-subjectivity-analysis/cited-by/