Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2026 / ALBA: An Automated Framework for Benchmarking Clinical Language Biomarkers against Standardized Corpora

ALBA: An Automated Framework for Benchmarking Clinical Language Biomarkers against Standardized Corpora

Paper · 2026 · Charalambos Themistocleous and Brielle C. Stark

Summary

Automated software can now extract many quantitative measures from patients' connected speech. Clinicians still struggle to interpret an individual score without norms produced by the same methods. The authors present ALBA (Automated Language Biomarker Application), a web tool built into the Open Brain AI platform. It compares one patient's language measure with reference distributions drawn from standardized clinical corpora, mainly AphasiaBank and other TalkBank repositories. The reference values and the clinician's data come from the same elicitation tasks (e.g., cookie theft, Cinderella story) and the same Open Brain AI processing pipeline, so the comparison is not distorted by differences between tools. ALBA does not reprocess transcripts. It stores precomputed summary statistics for each task–diagnosis–measure combination and then automatically chooses either a one-sample t-test or a Wilcoxon-based non-parametric test, depending on whether the reference distribution is normal. Output includes a p-value, an APA-style textual interpretation, and box, bar or violin plots. The tool makes normative benchmarking of discourse measures quick and accessible, supporting differential diagnosis, therapy planning and baseline tracking.

Key points

  • Reference cohorts include healthy controls and several clinical groups: aphasia subtypes, LHD, RHD, TBI, MCI and dementia. Norms are derived from more than 600 transcripts sourced from AphasiaBank/TalkBank.
  • Each Task × Diagnosis × Linguistic Variable cell stores eleven precomputed metrics, including mean, SD, median, min/max, Q1/Q3, Shapiro-Wilk p-value and skewness. Together these set an IsNormal flag.
  • Test choice works as follows:
    • A t-test is used if Shapiro-Wilk p > .05, or if n ≥ 30 with low skewness.
    • A Wilcoxon signed-rank approximation is used otherwise, including when |µ − M| > 0.1µ.
    • Results are labeled "Significant" or "Similar" at α = 0.05.
  • Computation runs client-side with the jStat library, so the patient's value never leaves the browser.
  • Aggregated norms for 290 linguistic biomarkers are released as a machine-readable CSV via openbrainai.com. Raw transcripts remain under TalkBank's registration-based access agreement.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Charalambos Themistocleous and Brielle C. Stark. 2026. ALBA: An Automated Framework for Benchmarking Clinical Language Biomarkers against Standardized Corpora. Proceedings of the Sixth Resources and ProcessIng of linguistic, para-linguistic and extra-linguistic Data from people with various forms of cognitive/psychiatric/developmental impairments in cooperation with the MENTAL.ai consortium.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.63317/449fwsyjuzbp

@inproceedings{themistocleous2026alba,
  title = {{ALBA: An Automated Framework for Benchmarking Clinical Language Biomarkers against Standardized Corpora}},
  author = {Charalambos Themistocleous and Brielle C. Stark},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth Resources and ProcessIng of linguistic, para-linguistic and extra-linguistic Data from people with various forms of cognitive/psychiatric/developmental impairments in cooperation with the MENTAL.ai consortium},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.63317/449fwsyjuzbp},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.63317/449fwsyjuzbp}
}

References

2 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. S. Bengio and G. Heigold. Word embeddings for speech recognition. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH, pages 1053–1057. Export Date: 20 February 2015. find
  2. Lucy Bryant, Alison Ferguson, and Elizabeth Spencer. 2016. Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature. Clinical linguistics phonetics, 30(7):489–518. \#\# Conclusion find

Updated

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/themistocleous-2026-alba-automated-framework-benchmarking-clinical/