Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A… / cited by

Who cites «Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025»

17 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 9 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025»

  1. AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User GuidearXiv:2605.18661Lingdong Kong, Xian Sun, Wei Chow, et al.2026 · 5 citations
  2. SoundnessBench: Can Your AI Scientist Really Tell Good Research Ideas from Bad Ones?arXiv:2605.30329Sy-Tuyen Ho, Minghui Liu, Huy Nghiem, et al.2026 · 2 citations
  3. "Give a Positive Review Only": An Early Investigation Into In-Paper Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for AI ReviewersarXiv:2511.01287Qin Zhou, Zhexin Zhang, Zhi Li, et al.2025 · 2 citations
  4. Exploring the use of AI authors and reviewers at Agents4SciencearXiv:2511.15534Federico Bianchi, Owen Queen, Nitya Thakkar, et al.2025 · 2 citations
  5. When AI Reviews Train AI Reviewers: Scientific-Judgment Collapse and MitigationarXiv:2609.20942Sy-Tuyen Ho, Minghui Liu, Furong Huang2026

8 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/thakkar-2025-llm-feedback-enhance-review/cited-by/