Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2026 / Knowledge is Not Enough: Injecting RL Skills for Continual Adaptation

Knowledge is Not Enough: Injecting RL Skills for Continual Adaptation

Paper · 2026 · Pingzhi Tang, Yiding Wang and Muhan Zhang

Summary

LLMs cannot absorb information that appears after their training cutoff. Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on new documents can store the facts, but the model often still fails to use them when answering questions or acting as an agent. Reinforcement learning (RL) teaches that kind of skill, yet it is too costly to rerun for every update.

The authors observe that weight changes produced by SFT and by RL point in almost orthogonal directions. They therefore treat knowledge and skill as separable. Their method, Parametric Skill Transfer (PaST), works in two steps:

  • On a source domain, it subtracts the SFT checkpoint from the RL-refined checkpoint to obtain a "Skill Vector".
  • On a new target domain, it applies only lightweight SFT and then adds the Skill Vector to the weights.

The method is tested on knowledge-incorporation QA (SQuAD, LooGLE) and closed-book tool use (ToolBench) with Qwen2.5-7B models. PaST beats strong SFT-based baselines, including SEAL, and nearly matches target-domain RL at no extra training cost on the target. This makes continual adaptation much cheaper.

Key points

  • On SQuAD, PaST reaches 56.9% accuracy against 47.0% for the self-editing baseline SEAL (a gain of up to 9.9 points). On LooGLE, with documents over 24k tokens, it gains 8.0 points absolute.
  • On ToolBench, zero-shot success on tool categories never seen during RL rises by 10.3 points on average, with gains across all categories.
  • Where the skill is injected matters (LooGLE, first 10 documents):
    • adding the vector after target SFT: 44.6
    • adding it before SFT: 36.5
    • fine-tuning the RL model directly on target data: 30.3
    • plain target SFT: 32.9
  • Compared with GRPO run directly on the target domain, PaST equals roughly 75 RL steps and trails 100 steps by only 1.6 points (44.6 vs 46.2). On 8×A100 GPUs, 75 steps would cost about 72 minutes per document; PaST needs no target-side RL time.
  • Limitations noted by the authors:
    • Experiments use only Qwen2.5-7B and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct.
    • The scaling coefficient λ is fixed at 1.
    • Splitting source RL training into 5 rounds of 2 documents worked best (45.3).

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Pingzhi Tang, Yiding Wang and Muhan Zhang. 2026. Knowledge is Not Enough: Injecting RL Skills for Continual Adaptation. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers).

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.550

@inproceedings{tang2026knowledge,
  title = {{Knowledge is Not Enough: Injecting RL Skills for Continual Adaptation}},
  author = {Pingzhi Tang, Yiding Wang and Muhan Zhang},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.550},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.550}
}

References

45 references, 18 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2016. Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450.
  2. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, and 1 others. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901.
  3. Sheng Cao, Mingrui Wu, Karthik Prasad, Yuandong Tian, and Zechun Liu. 2025. Param δ for direct mixing: Post-train large language model at zero cost. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. find
  4. Daixuan Cheng, Shaohan Huang, and Furu Wei. 2023. Adapting large language models to domains via reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.09530. find
  5. Jeffrey Cheng, Marc Marone, Orion Weller, Dawn Lawrie, Daniel Khashabi, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2024. Dated data: Tracing knowledge cutoffs in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12958. find
  6. Tianzhe Chu, Yuexiang Zhai, Jihan Yang, Shengbang Tong, Saining Xie, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V Le, Sergey Levine, and Yi Ma. 2025. Sft memorizes, rl generalizes: A comparative study of foundation model post-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17161.
  7. Guodong Du, Xuanning Zhou, Junlin Li, Zhuo Li, Zesheng Shi, Wanyu Lin, Ho-Kin Tang, Xiucheng Li, Fangming Liu, Wenya Wang, and 1 others. 2025. Knowledge grafting of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18502. — [arXiv:2505.18502](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18502) find
  8. Nelson Elhage, Tristan Hume, Catherine Olsson, Nicholas Schiefer, Tom Henighan, Shauna Kravec, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Robert Lasenby, Dawn Drain, Carol Chen, and 1 others. 2022. Toy models of superposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.10652. find
  9. Yossi Gandelsman, Yu Sun, Xinlei Chen, and Alexei Efros. 2022. Test-time training with masked autoencoders. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:29374–29385. find
  10. Gene H Golub and Charles F Van Loan. 2013. Matrix computations. JHU press. find
  11. Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, and 1 others. 2025. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948.
  12. Zhicheng Guo, Sijie Cheng, Hao Wang, Shihao Liang, Yujia Qin, Peng Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, and Yang Liu. 2024. Stabletoolbench: Towards stable large-scale benchmarking on tool learning of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07714. find
  13. Junyuan Hong, Lingjuan Lyu, Jiayu Zhou, and Michael Spranger. 2023. Mecta: Memory-economic continual test-time model adaptation. In 2023 International Conference on Learning Representations. find
  14. Gabriel Ilharco, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Mitchell Wortsman, Suchin Gururangan, Ludwig Schmidt, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, and Ali Farhadi. 2022. Editing models with task arithmetic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04089.
  15. Bowen Jin, Hansi Zeng, Zhenrui Yue, Jinsung Yoon, Sercan Arik, Dong Wang, Hamed Zamani, and Jiawei Han. 2025. Search-r1: Training llms to reason and leverage search engines with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09516.
  16. Andrew K Lampinen, Arslan Chaudhry, Stephanie CY Chan, Cody Wild, Diane Wan, Alex Ku, Jörg Bornschein, Razvan Pascanu, Murray Shanahan, and James L McClelland. 2025. On the generalization of language models from in-context learning and finetuning: a controlled study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00661. — [arXiv:2505.00661](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00661) find
  17. Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, and 1 others. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:9459–…
  18. Jiaqi Li, Mengmeng Wang, Zilong Zheng, and Muhan Zhang. 2024. Loogle: Can long-context language models understand long contexts? In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 16304–16333.
  19. Minghao Li, Yingxiu Zhao, Bowen Yu, Feifan Song, Hangyu Li, Haiyang Yu, Zhoujun Li, Fei Huang, and Yongbin Li. 2023. Api-bank: A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08244.
  20. Yuejiang Liu, Parth Kothari, Bastien Van Delft, Baptiste Bellot-Gurlet, Taylor Mordan, and Alexandre Alahi. 2021. Ttt++: When does self-supervised test-time training fail or thrive? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:21808–21820. find
  21. Yansheng Mao, Yufei Xu, Jiaqi Li, Fanxu Meng, Haotong Yang, Zilong Zheng, Xiyuan Wang, and Muhan Zhang. 2025. Lift: Improving long context understanding of large language models through long input fine-tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14644. — [arXiv:2502.14644](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14644) find
  22. Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, and Yonatan Belinkov. 2022. Locating and editing factual associations in gpt. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:17359–17372. find
  23. Kevin Meng, Arnab Sen Sharma, Alex J Andonian, Yonatan Belinkov, and David Bau. 2023. Mass-editing memory in a transformer. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations. find
  24. Sagnik Mukherjee, Lifan Yuan, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, and Hao Peng. 2025. Reinforcement learning finetunes small subnetworks in large language models. In The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. find
  25. David Osowiechi, Gustavo A Vargas Hakim, Mehrdad Noori, Milad Cheraghalikhani, Ismail Ben Ayed, and Christian Desrosiers. 2023. Tttflow: Unsupervised test-time training with normalizing flow. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 2126–2134. find
  26. Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, and 1 others. 2022. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730–27744.
  27. Cheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang, Xiusi Chen, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Gokhan Tur, and Heng Ji. 2025. Toolrl: Reward is all tool learning needs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13958. find
  28. Yujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu, Lan Yan, Yaxi Lu, Yankai Lin, Xin Cong, Xiangru Tang, Bill Qian, and 1 others. 2023. Toolllm: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world apis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16789.
  29. Qwen, :, An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Yang, Jiaxi Yang, Jingren Zhou, and 25 others. 2025. Qwen2.5 technical report. Preprint, arXiv:2412.15115. find
  30. Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05250.
  31. Adam Roberts, Colin Raffel, and Noam Shazeer. 2020. How much knowledge can you pack into the parameters of a language model? arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.08910. find
  32. Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Eric Hambro, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. 2023. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:68539–68551.
  33. John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. 2017. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347. find
  34. Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen, Minlie Huang, Nan Duan, and Weizhu Chen. 2023. Enhancing retrieval-augmented large language models with iterative retrieval-generation synergy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15294.
  35. Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, YK Li, Yang Wu, and 1 others. 2024. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300.
  36. Idan Shenfeld, Jyothish Pari, and Pulkit Agrawal. 2025. Rl’s razor: Why online reinforcement learning forgets less. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.04259. — [arXiv:2509.04259](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04259) find
  37. Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, and 1 others. 2023. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971.
  38. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
  39. Roman Vershynin. 2018. High-dimensional probability: An introduction with applications in data science, volume 47. Cambridge university press. find
  40. Zhepei Wei, Wenlin Yao, Yao Liu, Weizhi Zhang, Qin Lu, Liang Qiu, Changlong Yu, Puyang Xu, Chao Zhang, Bing Yin, and 1 others. 2025. Webagent-r1: Training web agents via end-to-end multi-turn reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16421.
  41. Yunzhi Yao, Peng Wang, Bozhong Tian, Siyuan Cheng, Zhoubo Li, Shumin Deng, Huajun Chen, and Ningyu Zhang. 2023. Editing large language models: Problems, methods, and opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13172. find
  42. Asaf Yehudai, Boaz Carmeli, Yosi Mass, Ofir Arviv, Nathaniel Mills, Eyal Shnarch, and Leshem Choshen. 2024. Achieving human parity in content-grounded datasets generation. In International Conference on Learning Representations. find
  43. Mohammad Zbeeb, Hasan Abed Al Kader Hammoud, and Bernard Ghanem. 2025. Reasoning vectors: Transferring chain-of-thought capabilities via task arithmetic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.01363. — [arXiv:2509.01363](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01363) find
  44. Hanqing Zhu, Zhenyu Zhang, Hanxian Huang, DiJia Su, Zechun Liu, Jiawei Zhao, Igor Fedorov, Hamed Pirsiavash, Zhizhou Sha, Jinwon Lee, and 1 others. 2025. The path not taken: Rlvr provably learns off the principals. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.08567. — [arXiv:2511.08567](https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08567) find
  45. Adam Zweiger, Jyothish Pari, Han Guo, Ekin Akyürek, Yoon Kim, and Pulkit Agrawal. 2025. Self-adapting language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10943. — [arXiv:2506.10943](https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10943) find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tang-2026-knowledge-is-not-enough-injecting/