Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2015 / World Englishes As A Site for Pedagogies of The Public Sphere

World Englishes As A Site for Pedagogies of The Public Sphere

Paper · 2015 · Amarjit Singh

Summary

This is a theoretical essay in critical pedagogy, not an empirical or computational study. It has no data, corpus, model or evaluation. Singh asks whether the global spread of English, driven by market globalization and post-Fordist capitalism, mainly entrenches a "hegemony of English" or instead opens room for democratic debate. The paper combines Kachru's account of world Englishes with Fraser's revision of Habermas's notion of the public sphere and with Giroux's critical pedagogy. Its central claim is that world Englishes should be seen as a cultural and political site where new knowledge, representations and identities are produced. On that view, picking either the hegemony side or the liberation side gains little. The productive space lies between the two. Educators, artists, lawyers, media workers and other "cultural workers" are urged to act there with pedagogies fitted to their local situation. The argument matters because it moves the question from whether English is good or bad to what people actually do with English in particular places.

Key points

  • The paper offers five suggestions to cultural workers:
    • adopt a self-image as critical educators who consider what could be, not only what is;
    • treat world Englishes as a site of knowledge and identity production;
    • stay aware of the shift from English to Englishes;
    • recognize that public spheres may shrink if they do not participate;
    • build locally fitted pedagogies of transformation.
  • The context comes from globalization and post-Fordism (Harvey 1992, Smart 1993), including Hall's (1991) list of post-Fordist traits. In this account, market culture made English the default international custom.
  • The critique of English dominance draws on Tsuda (1993, 1994, 1994a), who links it to linguistic discrimination, cultural imperialism and colonization of consciousness. Singh reads this as a narrowing of the public sphere in Fraser's (1994) sense.
  • Kachru (1994) separates English as a medium (shared form) from English as a repertoire of cultural pluralism (function and content). He argues the medium does not limit what messages pass through it.
  • The PDF metadata gives 2015, but the page footer marks the issue as N° 3 (1996). The sources cited date from the 1990s.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Kachru separates one shared code from the many cultural contents it carries, so a Nigerian and an Indian speaker share the form while voicing different worlds.
  • I2. The same separation of form from content suggests that cultural content belongs in a layer above grammar, not inside it.
  • I3. The author holds that relabelling, such as "English literature" becoming "English literatures", is never neutral and carries ideology and power interests.
  • I4. Critical educators are asked to see the world both as it is and as it ought to be or could be.
  • I5. The essay refuses a two-camp framing and looks for value in the space between opposing positions.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (tree): Treat Indian, Nigerian, Singaporean and other varieties as one medium for parsing, and test the parser's robustness on them rather than treating them as noise or a separate language.
  • I2 (world): Keep variety-specific or culture-specific knowledge in the world/ontology layer, so the same UD tree can be read against different cultural backgrounds.
  • I3 (frames): Flag stance-bearing lexical choices, such as one term picked over a near-synonym, as evidence about the speaker's position in pragmatic analysis.
  • I4 (world): Keep actual states apart from deontic and possible states in the text world, so normative or hypothetical claims are never stored as facts.
  • I5 (learn): When witness parsers or LLM teachers disagree, study the disagreement zone as a source of repair rules instead of forcing a majority-vote choice.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

📚 Shelves 2The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 9,296 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 9,206 works

🧭 Topics 1Research subjects and languages the work is about.English · 1,373 works

Cite

Cite as Amarjit Singh. 2015. World Englishes As A Site for Pedagogies of The Public Sphere. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 3.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

@inproceedings{singh2015world,
  title = {{World Englishes As A Site for Pedagogies of The Public Sphere}},
  author = {Amarjit Singh},
  booktitle = {Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 3},
  year = {2015},
  url = {https://ojsspdc.ulpgc.es/ojs/index.php/LFE/article/view/110}
}

References

42 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Archer, R.M. 1990. "Foreword" in M. Albrow and E. King eds. Globalization, Knowledge and Society. London: Sage. find
  2. Aronowitz, S. and Giroux, H.A. 1985. Education Under Seize: The Conservative Liberal and Radical Debate Over Schooling. Massachusetts: Bergin and Garvey. find
  3. Aschcroft, B.; Griffiths, G. and Tiffin, H. 1989. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. New York: Routledge. find
  4. Bloom, A. 1987. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simón and Schuster. find
  5. Cherryholmes, C.H. 1988. Power and Criticism: Poststructural Investigations in Education. New York: Teacher College, Columbia University. find
  6. Dirlik,A. 1994. "ThePostcolonialAura: ThirdWorldCriticismintheAgeofGlobalCapitalism." Critical Inquiry, Winter, pp. 328-356. find
  7. Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper Colophon Books. find
  8. Foucault, M. 1980. \t\C.Goráontá. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Pantheon. find
  9. Fraser, N. 1994. "Rethinking The Public Sphere: A Contribution to The Critique of Actually Existing Democracy." in H.A. Giroux and P. McLaren eds. pp. 74-98. find
  10. Freiré, P. 1989 [1971]. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum. find
  11. Giroux, H.A. 1988a. Schooling and The Struggle For Public Life: Critical Pedagogy in the ModernAge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. find
  12. Giroux, H.A. 1988b. Teacher as Intellectuals: TowardA Critical Pedagogy of Learning. Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey. find
  13. Giroux, H.A. 1993. Border Crossing: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. New York: Routledge. find
  14. Giroux, H.A. 1994b. Disturbing Pleasures: Learning Popular Culture. New York: Routledge. ↗
  15. Giroux, H.A. ed. 1991. Postmodernism, Feminism, and Cultural Politics. New York: Albany State University of New York Press. find
  16. Giroux, H.A. and McLaren, P. 1994. Between Borders: Pedagogy and the Politics of Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge. find
  17. Grossberg, L. 1994. " Introduction: Bringin' it All Back Home - Pedagogy and Cultural Studies" in H.A. Giroux and P. McLaren eds. pp. 1-25. find
  18. Hall, S. 1991. "Brava New World." SocialistReview,9\,l^o. l,pp. 57-58. find
  19. Harvey, D. 1992. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origin of Cultural Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. find
  20. Haskell, T.L. and R.F.Teichgraeberm. 1993. The Culture of the Market. New York; Cambridge University Press. find
  21. Held, D. 1987. Models of Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press. find
  22. Hirsch, E.D. Jr. 1988. Cultural Literacy: Why Every American Needs to Know. New York: Vintage Books. find
  23. Huntington, S.P. 1993. The Clash of Civilization? The Debate. New York; Foreign Affairs. find
  24. Kachru,B.B. 1986. "The Power and Politics ofEnglish." World Englishes, 5.2-3,: pp. 121-140. find
  25. Kacliru, B.B. 1990. "World Englishes and Applied Linguistics" in Learning, Keeping and Using Language (Vol. 11). Edited by M.A.K. Halliday, J. Gibbons, and H. Nicholas. Amsterdam and Philadelphia; John Benjamín. AUoin World Englishes, 9.i: pp. 3-20. find
  26. Kachru, B.B. 1992. "Meaning in Deviation" in B.B. Kachru ed. The Other Tongue. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. find
  27. Kachru, B.B. 1994. "The Speaking Tree; A Médium of Plural Canons" in Georgetown Round Table in Languages and Linguistics (GURT). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. find
  28. McArthur, Tom. 1994. "Organized Babel: English as a Global Lingua Franca" in James E. Alatis ed. Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1994. Wahington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. find
  29. McLaren, P. 1989. Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education. Toronto: Irwin Publishing. find
  30. Mouffe, C. 1988. "Radical Democracy; Modem or Postmodern" in Andrew Ross ed. í/níver salAbandon: The Politics of Postmodern. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. find
  31. Rorty, R. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972-198? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. find
  32. Simón, LR. 1992. Teaching Against the Grain: Text for a Pedagogy ofPossibility. New York: Bergin &. Garvey. find
  33. Simón, I.R. 1994. "Formsoflnsurgency intheProduction of Popular Memories: TheColumbus Quincentenary and the Pedagogy of Counter Commemoration" in H.A. Giroux & P. McLaren eds. pp. 127-142. find
  34. Smart, B. 1993. Postmodernity: Key Ideas. New York: Routledge. find
  35. Spring, J. 1994. Wheels in the Head. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. find
  36. Tsuda, Y. ed. 1993. Eigo Shihai-eno Iron [The Objection to the Hegemony of English] Tokyo: Disan Shokan. find
  37. Tsuda, Y. 1994. "The Diffusion of English: Its Impact on Culture and Communication." Keio Communication Review, No. 16, pp. 49-61. find
  38. Tsuda, Y. 1994a. "The hegemony ofEnglishininternational communication." Apaperpresented for the 1994 Annual Convention of International Communication Association, July, 1994, Sydney, Australia. find
  39. Williams, R. 1989. "The Future of Cultural Studies." The Politics of Modemism: Against the New Conformists. London: Verso. find
  40. Willis, P. 1990. Common Culture. Boulder: Westview. find
  41. Wright, E.O. 1978. "Intellectuals and The Working Class." The Insurgent Sociologists, 8(11), pp 8-15. ↗
  42. Zavarzadeh, M. and D. Morton. 1994. Theory as Resistance: Politics and Culture after (Post) Structuralism. New York: The Guliford Press. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/singh-2015-world-englishes-site-pedagogies-public/