Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2015 / Tracing the origins of ESP in Old English Ælfric's Colloquy and Cosmology

Tracing the origins of ESP in Old English Ælfric's Colloquy and Cosmology

Paper · 2015 · María Ángeles Ruiz Moneva

Summary

The paper asks whether texts written for specialised purposes, the domain now studied as ESP, already existed in Old English. It examines two works by Ælfric. The first is his Cosmology, a mix of religious and scientific writing dated to around 993. The second is his Colloquy on the Occupations, a dialogue written as a companion to his Latin Grammar, in which characters describe their trades. The author first reviews ESP and genre theory, including Trimble's rhetorical levels, Strevens' defining features, Swales' discourse community, and genre and text-type work by Taavitsainen, Kohnen and Meurman-Solin. She then contrasts the linguistic traits of each text with typical features of present-day professional English. Some features carry over across the centuries: tense use, the meanings of certain modals, and ways of building closeness with readers. Other typical ESP traits are missing from the Colloquy because of its spoken, direct style. The study argues that Old English is a legitimate starting point for the history of scientific and occupational genres. It also notes that "science" then was deeply religious in orientation.

Key points

  • The two texts are the Cosmology (dated to about 993 following Burnley) and the Colloquy, composed a few years later and described by Mitchell and Robinson as a companion to the Latin Grammar.
  • In the Colloquy, most clauses use the simple present with a habitual sense, alongside imperatives, plural ge/we in questions and answers, and adverbs that point to the immediate situation.
  • The Colloquy's modals divide by meaning:
    • CUNNAN expresses ability or know-how.
    • SCEAL expresses what members of a trade should or should not do.
    • MAGAN expresses possibility.
  • Several typical ESP traits are largely absent from the Colloquy:
    • there are no Latin–native doublets;
    • hedges are practically absent;
    • passives are very rare;
    • there are no nominalisations;
    • sentences are short and joined mostly by juxtaposition or "and".
  • The paper points to historical corpora as evidence that genre-based methods can be applied to older data, among them the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, the Corpus of Early English Medical Writing and the Helsinki Corpus.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. The paper characterises a genre with a fixed checklist of register features (tense, modals, passives, nominalisations, hedges, sentence linking) and contrasts it against a reference profile, which is a cheap and interpretable way to describe any text type.
  • I2. Modals are read by their flavour: know-how (CUNNAN), professional obligation (SCEAL) and possibility (MAGAN). This keeps ability, norm and chance apart instead of treating all modals alike.
  • I3. In occupational dialogue, the simple present describes habitual activity rather than single events, so the tense reflects a role's routine.
  • I4. Trimble's "conceptual paragraph" groups every statement that supports one core generalisation, regardless of where the visual paragraph breaks fall.
  • I5. Plural address forms and situation-pointing adverbs are treated as markers of a direct, interactive style and of closeness to the addressee.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (learn): Running such a feature profile on new input versus training treebanks could flag domain shift before parser accuracy silently drops.
  • I2 (frames): Frames could carry a modal-flavour slot, so that "a hunter must not be timid" becomes a norm rather than an asserted fact.
  • I3 (world): Habitual-present clauses could be stored as standing properties of an entity's role instead of being placed on the event timeline.
  • I4 (back): Generation could plan text in such units, gathering supporting details under one generalisation from the meaning graph before laying out paragraphs.
  • I5 (frames): These cues could feed speech-act and addressee tracking, helping to tell dialogic instruction apart from detached exposition.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

📚 Shelves 2The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 9,296 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 9,206 works

🧭 Topics 2Research subjects and languages the work is about.English · 1,373 worksHistorical linguistics & language change · 159 works

Cite

Cite as María Ángeles Ruiz Moneva. 2015. Tracing the origins of ESP in Old English Ælfric's Colloquy and Cosmology. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 17.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

@inproceedings{moneva2015tracing,
  title = {{Tracing the origins of ESP in Old English Ælfric's Colloquy and Cosmology}},
  author = {María Ángeles Ruiz Moneva},
  booktitle = {Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 17},
  year = {2015},
  url = {https://ojsspdc.ulpgc.es/ojs/index.php/LFE/article/view/98}
}

References

55 references, 1 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Anderson, E. A. (1974). Social idealism in Ælfric’s Colloquy. Anglo-Saxon England, 3, 153-162. ↗
  2. Aristotle 1971 (ca. 330 BC). Poetics. In Hazard Adams, (Eds.), Critical theory since Plato (pp. 47-66). San Diego: Harcourt. find
  3. Aristotle 1991 (384-322 BC). The art of rhetoric. (Edward P. J. Corbett, Ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin. find
  4. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. find
  5. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: language use in professional settings. London and New York: Longman. find
  6. Bhatia, V. K. (2001). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. IBÉRICA, 3, 3-17. <http://www.aelfe.org/documents/text4-Bhatia.pdf> [Last accessed: 20-02-2011]. ↗
  7. Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse. A genre-based view. London: Continuum. find
  8. Bhatia, V. K. (2008). Genre analysis, ESP and professional practice. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 161–174. ↗
  9. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: CUP. ↗
  10. Burnley, D. 1993 (1992). The history of the English language. A source book. London and New York: Longman. find
  11. Burrow, J. (1982). Medieval writers and their work: Middle English literature and its background 1100-1500. Oxford: OUP. find
  12. Chandler, D. (1997). An introduction to genre theory. <http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/intgenre/intgenre.html> [Last accessed: 19-02-11]. ↗
  13. Cuddon, J. A. 1985 (1976). A dictionary of literary terms. Harmondsworth: Penguin. find
  14. Downing, A. (1996). Register and/or Genre? In I. Vázquez & A. Hornero (Eds.), Current issues in genre theory (pp. 11-27). Zaragoza: Mira Editores. find
  15. Dudley-Evans, T. & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: CUP. find
  16. Garmonsway, G. N. (Ed.). 1999 (1939). Ælfric’s Colloquy. University of Exeter Press. find
  17. Gotti, M. (2001). The experimental essay in Early Modern English. European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 221-239. ↗
  18. Gunnarsson, B. L. (2008). Professional communication. In: N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of language and education. 2nd. ed. Vol. 4: Second and foreign language education (pp. 83-95). Springer Science + Business Media LLC. find
  19. Hutchinson, T. & Waters, E. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: CUP. ↗
  20. Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 116-127. ↗
  21. Jauss, H. R. (1979). The alterity and modernity of medieval literature. New Literary History, 10, 181-229. find
  22. Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes. Cambridge: CUP. ↗
  23. Kohnen, T. (2001). On defining text types within Historical Linguistics: The case of petitions/statutes. European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 197-203. ↗
  24. Lafuente-Millán, E., Mur-Dueñas, P., Lorés-Sanz, R. & Vázquez-Orta, I. (2010). Interpersonality in written academic discourse: Three analytical perspectives. In Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P., & Lafuente-Millán, E. (Eds.), Constructing interpersonality: Multiple perspectives on written academic discourse (pp.13-20). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. find
  25. Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P. & Lafuente-Millán, E. (Eds.). (2010a). Constructing interpersonality: Multiple perspectives on written academic discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. find
  26. Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P. & Lafuente-Millán, E. (2010b). Introduction. Constructing interpersonality: multiple perspectives on written academic discourse (pp. 1-10). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. find
  27. Malone, K. & Baugh, A. C. 1989 (1967). A literary history of England I: The Middle Ages. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. find
  28. Mantello, F. A. C. & A. G. Rigg. 1999 (1996). Medieval Latin. An introduction and bibliographic guide. The Catholic University of America Press. find
  29. Meurman-Solin, A. (2001). Genre as a variable in sociohistorical linguistics. European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 241-256. ↗
  30. Mitchell, B. & Robinson, F. C. 2007 (1964). A guide to Old English. Oxford: Blackwell. find
  31. Moessner, L. (2001). Genre, text type, style, register: A terminological maze? European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 131-138. ↗
  32. Pahta, P. (2001). Creating a new genre: Contextual dimensions in the production and transmission of early scientific writing. European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 205-220. ↗
  33. Quirk, R. et al. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London & New York: Longman. find
  34. Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall International. find
  35. Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: CUP.
  36. Sherburne, G. & Bond, D. F. 1980 (1967). A literary history of England III: The Restoration and the eighteenth century. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. find
  37. Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after twenty years: a re-appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP: State of the art. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre. find
  38. Swales, J. (1988). Episodes in ESP. Hemel-Hempstead: Prentice-Hall International. find
  39. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: CUP. find
  40. Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: CUP. find
  41. Swales, J. (2009). Genre in a changing world. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo. (Eds.), Perspectives on writing. Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press, <http://wac.colostate.edu/books/genre/> and <http://www3.unisul.br/paginas/ensino/pos/linguagem/cd/English/15i.pdf> [Last accessed: 07/01/2011]. ↗
  42. Sweet, H. (1897). First steps in Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: OUP. find
  43. Taavitsainen, I. (1997). Genre conventions: Personal affect in fiction and non-fiction in Early Modern English. In M. Rissanen, M. Kytö & K. Heikkonen (Eds.), English in transition: Corpus-based studies in linguistic variation and genre styles (pp. 185-266). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ↗
  44. Taavitsainen, I. (2001). Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 139-150. ↗
  45. Taavitsainen, I. (2004). Genres of secular instruction: a linguistic history of useful entertainment. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 29, 75-94. ↗
  46. Todorov, T. (1990). Genres in discourse. Cambridge: CUP. find
  47. Trimble, L. (1985). English for science and technology. A discourse approach. Cambridge: CUP. find
  48. Van Dijk, T. (1972). A note on linguistic macrostructures. Paper 7th Linguistic Colloquium, Nijmegen, 1972. In A. P. Ten Cate & P. Jordens, (Eds.), Linguistische Perspektiven (pp.75-87). Tübingen: Niemeyer. <http://www.discourses.org/> [Last accessed: 16-02-2011]. <http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/A%20Note%20on%20Linguistic% 20Macro-structures.pdf>. ↗
  49. Van Dijk, T. (1976). Narrative macrostructures. Cognitive and logical foundations. PTL 1, 547-568. <http://www.discourses.org/> [Last accessed: 16-02-2011]. <http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Narrative%20macrostructures.pdf>. ↗
  50. Van Dijk, T. (1977). Pragmatic macrostructures in discourse and cognition. In M. de Mey, et al., (Eds.), CC 77 (pp. 99-113). University of Ghent, 1977. <http://www.discourses.org/> [Last accessed: 16-02-2011]. <http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Pragmatic%20macrostructures%20 in%20discourse%20and%20cognition.pdf>. ↗
  51. Van Dijk, T. (1995). On macrostructures, mental models and other inventions: A brief personal history of the Kintsch-Van Dijk theory. In Weaver III, Ch., Suzanne Mannes, S. & Fletcher, C. R. (Eds.), Discourse comprehension. Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 383-410). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. <http://www.discourses.org/> [Last accessed: 21-02-2011]. <http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/On%20Macrostructures,%20Men tal%20Models%20and%20Other%20Inventions.pdf>. ↗
  52. Varela Bravo, E. J. (1998). Relevance: A pragmatic analysis of a passage from Ælfric’s Colloquy. Actas del Primer Congreso Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lengua y Literatura Medieval (SELIM) (pp. 293-308). Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo. find
  53. Varela Bravo, E. J. (2000). Relevance: A pragmatic analysis of a passage from Ælfric’s Colloquy 9 years after. In A.M. Hornero & M.P. Navarro (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10 th . International Conference of SELIM. Actas del X Congreso Internacional de SELIM (pp. 277-288). Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico. find
  54. Ward, A. W. & Trent, W. P. et al. 2000 (1907-21). The Cambridge history of british and American literature: An encyclopaedia in eighteen volumes. Cambridge and New York: CUP & G.P. Putnam’s Sons. <http://www.bartleby.com/br/211.html> [Last accessed: 12-02-2011]. ↗
  55. Werlich, E. (1982). A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/moneva-2015-tracing-origins-esp-old-english/