Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2026 / MedRedFlag: Investigating how LLMs Redirect Misconceptions in Real-World Health Communication

MedRedFlag: Investigating how LLMs Redirect Misconceptions in Real-World Health Communication

Paper · 2026 · Sraavya Sambara, Yuan Pu, Ayman Ali et al.

Summary

Patients often build their health questions on mistaken beliefs, such as trusting an implausible wearable reading or assuming a rare diagnosis. Clinicians usually respond by redirecting: they correct the faulty premise and then address what the patient actually needs. This paper asks whether LLMs do the same. The authors started from MedRedQA, a corpus of r/AskDocs posts answered by verified clinicians. After filtering it, they ran a staged GPT-5 pipeline that:

  • condenses the patient's question,
  • infers the implicit question the physician actually answered,
  • flags pairs where the two diverge,
  • lists the misconceptions being corrected.

The result is MedRedFlag, a benchmark of more than 1,100 real questions that require redirection. The authors also built an automated evaluation that checks two things: whether a response tackles the false assumption, and whether it avoids content that reinforces it. Across state-of-the-art LLMs, models frequently go along with the flawed premise, even when they appear to notice it. Initial mitigation strategies did not close this gap. This exposes a safety blind spot for patient-facing medical AI that exam-style benchmarks miss.

Key points

  • The source corpus is MedRedQA (about 51,000 r/AskDocs question–answer pairs, July 2013–April 2022). Filters removed image references, edited posts and texts under 10 words, leaving 33,090 usable pairs.
  • Redirection annotation was automated with GPT-5 (gpt-5-2025-08-07). The approach draws on the discourse-theory idea of an implicit "question under discussion," and the pipeline was checked by expert physicians.
  • Responses are scored on two criteria: (1) whether the misconception is addressed and (2) whether the response refrains from accommodating it. The authors found that detecting a false premise does not guarantee redirection.
  • The authors list several limitations:
    • The Reddit data may already appear in model training data.
    • The benchmark does not measure unwarranted redirection.
    • Forum style differs from how people write to chatbots.
  • Code and data are available at github.com/srsambara-1/MedRedFlag, under the same access terms as MedRedQA. The study was reviewed by an IRB and deemed exempt.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

🎓Stanford UniversityStanford · United States434 works · 314,419 citations🎓Duke UniversityDurham · United States28 works · 15,077 citations

 Fields, topics and concepts

📚 Shelves 5The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Medicine · 241 worksHealth Informatics · 184 worksHealth Professions · 69 worksHealth Information Management · 50 worksGeneral Health Professions · 14 works

🧭 Topics 1Research subjects and languages the work is about.Language models & pretraining · 3,320 works

Cite

Cite as Sraavya Sambara, Yuan Pu, Ayman Ali, Vishala Mishra, Lionel Wong and Monica Agrawal. 2026. MedRedFlag: Investigating how LLMs Redirect Misconceptions in Real-World Health Communication. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1771

@inproceedings{sambara2026medredflag,
  title = {{MedRedFlag: Investigating how LLMs Redirect Misconceptions in Real-World Health Communication}},
  author = {Sraavya Sambara, Yuan Pu, Ayman Ali, Vishala Mishra, Lionel Wong and Monica Agrawal},
  booktitle = {Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1771},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1771}
}

References

45 references, 14 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Sirwan Khalid Ahmed, Ribwar Arsalan Mohammed, Abdulqadir J. Nashwan, Radhwan Hussein Ibrahim, Araz Qadir Abdalla, Barzan Mohammed M. Ameen, and Renas Mohammed Khdhir. 2025. Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6:100198. find
  2. Heidi Allespach, Erin N. Marcus, and Kassandra M. Bosire. 2018. Sailing on the ‘7 cs’: teaching junior doctors how to redirect patients during difficult consultations in primary care. Education for Primary Care, 29(1):46–48. PMID: 28395646. find
  3. Annenberg Public Policy Center. 2025. Many in U.S. consider AI-generated health information useful and reliable. University of Pennsylvania. Accessed: 2025-12-15. find
  4. Anthropic. 2025. System card: Claude Opus 4.5. Accessed: 2026-01-05. find
  5. Rahul K. Arora, Jason Wei, Rebecca Soskin Hicks, Preston Bowman, Joaquin Quiñonero-Candela, Foivos Tsimpourlas, Michael Sharman, Meghan Shah, Andrea Vallone, Alex Beutel, Johannes Heidecke, and Karan Singhal. 2025. Healthbench: Evaluating large language models towards improved human health. Preprint…
  6. John W. Ayers, Adam Poliak, Mark Dredze, Eric C. Leas, Zechariah Zhu, Jessica B. Kelley, Dennis J. Faix, Aaron M. Goodman, Christopher A. Longhurst, Michael Hogarth, and Davey M. Smith. 2023. Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public so… find
  7. Andrew M Bean, Rebecca Elizabeth Payne, Guy Parsons, Hannah Rose Kirk, Juan Ciro, Rafael Mosquera-Gómez, Sara Hincapié M, Aruna S Ekanayaka, Lionel Tarassenko, Luc Rocher, and 1 others. 2026. Reliability of llms as medical assistants for the general public: a randomized preregistered study. Nature M… find
  8. Asma Ben Abacha and Dina Demner-Fushman. 2019. On the summarization of consumer health questions. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2228– 2234, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  9. Faeze Brahman, Sachin Kumar, Vidhisha Balachandran, Pradeep Dasigi, Valentina Pyatkin, Abhilasha Ravichander, Sarah Wiegreffe, Nouha Dziri, Khyathi Chandu, Jack Hessel, Yulia Tsvetkov, Noah A. Smith, Yejin Choi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024. The art of saying no: Contextual noncompliance in languag…
  10. Shan Chen, Mingye Gao, Kuleen Sasse, Thomas Hartvigsen, Brian Anthony, Lizhou Fan, Hugo Aerts, Jack Gallifant, and Danielle Bitterman. 2024. Wait, but tylenol is acetaminophen... investigating and improving language models’ ability to resist requests for misinformation. Preprint, arXiv:2409.20385. — [arXiv:2409.20385](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.20385) find
  11. Shan Chen, Mingye Gao, Kuleen Sasse, Thomas Hartvigsen, Brian Anthony, Lizhou Fan, Hugo Aerts, Jack Gallifant, and Danielle S Bitterman. 2025a. When helpfulness backfires: Llms and the risk of false medical information due to sycophantic behavior. npj Digital Medicine, 8(1):605. find
  12. Sijia Chen, Xiaomin Li, Mengxue Zhang, Eric Hanchen Jiang, Qingcheng Zeng, and Chen-Hsiang Yu. 2025b. CARES: Comprehensive evaluation of safety and adversarial robustness in medical LLMs. In The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track. find
  13. Jeremy Cole, Michael Zhang, Daniel Gillick, Julian Eisenschlos, Bhuwan Dhingra, and Jacob Eisenstein. 2023. Selectively answering ambiguous questions. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 530–543, Singapore. Association for Computational Li…
  14. Gordon V. Cormack, Charles L A Clarke, and Stefan Buettcher. 2009. Reciprocal rank fusion outperforms condorcet and individual rank learning methods. In Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR ’09, page 758–759, New York,…
  15. Ashwin Daswani, Rohan Sawant, and Najoung Kim. 2024. Syn-qa2: Evaluating false assumptions in long-tail questions with synthetic qa datasets. Preprint, arXiv:2403.12145. — [arXiv:2403.12145](https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12145) find
  16. Zhichen Dong, Zhanhui Zhou, Chao Yang, Jing Shao, and Yu Qiao. 2024. Attacks, defenses and evaluations for LLM conversation safety: A survey. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: L… find
  17. Rachel Draelos. 2025. Healthbench does not evaluate patient safety. Accessed: 2025-12-18. find
  18. Aaron Fanous, Jacob Goldberg, Ank Agarwal, Joanna Lin, Anson Zhou, Sonnet Xu, Vasiliki Bikia, Roxana Daneshjou, and Sanmi Koyejo. 2025. Syceval: Evaluating llm sycophancy. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 8(1):893–900. find
  19. Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Alex Vaughan, Amy Yang, Angela Fan, Anirudh Goyal, Anthony Hartshorn, Aobo Yang, Archi Mitra, Archie Sravankumar, Artem Korenev, Arthur Hinsvark, and 542 o… — The Llama 3 Herd of Models
  20. Ruohao Guo, Wei Xu, and Alan Ritter. 2025. How to protect yourself from 5G radiation? investigating LLM responses to implicit misinformation. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 28842– 28861, Suzhou, China. Association for Computational Li… find
  21. Vincent Nguyen, Sarvnaz Karimi, Maciej Rybinski, and Zhenchang Xing. 2023. MedRedQA for medical consumer question answering: Dataset, tasks, and neural baselines. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 3rd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapt… find
  22. OpenAI. 2025. GPT-5 system card. Accessed: 2026-01-05. find
  23. Shengding Hu, Yifan Luo, Huadong Wang, Xingyi Cheng, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2023. Won’t get fooled again: Answering questions with false premises. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 5626–5643, Toronto, Cana… find
  24. Marley Presiado, Alex Montero, Lunna Lopes, and Liz Hamel. 2024. KFF health misinformation tracking poll: Artificial intelligence and health information. Technical report, KFF. Accessed: 2025-12-15. find
  25. Di Jin, Eileen Pan, Nassim Oufattole, Wei-Hung Weng, Hanyi Fang, and Peter Szolovits. 2021. What disease does this patient have? a large-scale open domain question answering dataset from medical exams. Applied Sciences, 11(14).
  26. Craige Roberts. 2012. Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and pragmatics, 5:6–1. find
  27. Qiao Jin, Won Kim, Qingyu Chen, Donald C Comeau, Lana Yeganova, John W Wilbur, and Zhiyong Lu. 2023. Medcpt: Contrastive pre-trained transformers with large-scale pubmed search logs for zero-shot biomedical information retrieval. Bioinformatics, 39(11):btad651. find
  28. Navreet Kaur, Monojit Choudhury, and Danish Pruthi. 2024. Evaluating large language models for health-related queries with presuppositions. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 14308–14331, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  29. Lev Konstantinovskiy, Oliver Price, Mevan Babakar, and Arkaitz Zubiaga. 2021. Toward automated factchecking: Developing an annotation schema and benchmark for consistent automated claim detection. Digital Threats, 2(2). find
  30. Woosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng, Lianmin Zheng, Cody Hao Yu, Joseph Gonzalez, Hao Zhang, and Ion Stoica. 2023. Efficient memory management for large language model serving with pagedattention. In Proceedings of the 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, SOSP ’23, page 611…
  31. Siru Liu, Aileen P Wright, Allison B Mccoy, Sean S Huang, Julian Z Genkins, Josh F Peterson, Yaa A Kumah-Crystal, William Martinez, Babatunde Carew, Dara Mize, Bryan Steitz, and Adam Wright. 2024. Using large language model to guide patients to create efficient and comprehensive clinical care messag… find
  32. Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Roxana Daneshjou, and Emily Alsentzer. 2025. It’s time to bench the medical exam benchmark. NEJM AI, 2(2):AIe2401235. find
  33. Stephen Robertson and Hugo Zaragoza. 2009. The probabilistic relevance framework: Bm25 and beyond. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 3(4):333–389. find
  34. Teddy Rosenbluth. 2025. Meet dr. chatgpt. The New York Times. Accessed: 2025-12-15. find
  35. Andrew Sellergren, Sahar Kazemzadeh, Tiam Jaroensri, Atilla Kiraly, Madeleine Traverse, Timo Kohlberger, Shawn Xu, Fayaz Jamil, Cían Hughes, Charles Lau, Justin Chen, Fereshteh Mahvar, Liron Yatziv, Tiffany Chen, Bram Sterling, Stefanie Anna Baby, Susanna Maria Baby, Jeremy Lai, Samuel Schmidgall, a… find
  36. Judith Sieker, Clara Lachenmaier, and Sina Zarrieß. 2025. Llms struggle to reject false presuppositions when misinformation stakes are high. Preprint, arXiv:2505.22354.
  37. Karan Singhal, Shekoofeh Azizi, Tao Tu, S Sara Mahdavi, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, Nathan Scales, Ajay Tanwani, Heather Cole-Lewis, Stephen Pfohl, and 1 others. 2023. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature, 620(7972):172–180.
  38. Neha Srikanth, Rachel Rudinger, and Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber. 2025. No questions are stupid, but some are poorly posed: Understanding poorly-posed information-seeking questions. In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 31… find
  39. Neha Srikanth, Rupak Sarkar, Heran Mane, Elizabeth Aparicio, Quynh Nguyen, Rachel Rudinger, and Jordan Boyd-Graber. 2024. Pregnant questions: The importance of pragmatic awareness in maternal health question answering. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Associ…
  40. Masaki Suzuki and Yusuke Yamamoto. 2021. Characterizing the influence of confirmation bias on web search behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:771948. find
  41. G Swaminath. 2007. Doctor-patient communication: Patient perception. find
  42. Guangzhi Xiong, Qiao Jin, Zhiyong Lu, and Aidong Zhang. 2024. Benchmarking retrieval-augmented generation for medicine. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 6233–6251, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  43. Xinyan Yu, Sewon Min, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023. CREPE: Open-domain question answering with false presuppositions. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 10457–10480, Toronto, Canada. Association…
  44. Hang Zhang, Qian Lou, and Yanshan Wang. 2025. Towards safe ai clinicians: A comprehensive study on large language model jailbreaking in healthcare. Preprint, arXiv:2501.18632. — [arXiv:2501.18632](https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18632) find
  45. Wang Bill Zhu, Tianqi Chen, Xinyan Velocity Yu, Ching Ying Lin, Jade Law, Mazen Jizzini, Jorge J. Nieva, Ruishan Liu, and Robin Jia. 2025. Cancer-myth: Evaluating large language models on patient questions with false presuppositions. Preprint, arXiv:2504.11373.

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/sambara-2026-medredflag-investigating-how-llms-redirect/