🔗 Who cites «Can We Further Elicit Reasoning in LLMs? Critic-Guided Planning with Retrieval-Augmentation for Solving Challenging Tasks»

11 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 6 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Can We Further Elicit Reasoning in LLMs? Critic-Guided Planning with Retrieval-Augmentation for Solving Challenging Tasks»

1. R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2503.05592Huatong Song, Jinhao Jiang, Yingqian Min, et al.2025 · 141 citations
2. ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without SearchingarXiv:2505.04588Hao Sun, Zile Qiao, Jiayan Guo, et al.2025 · 50 citations
3. ReARTeR: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning with Trustworthy Process RewardingInternational ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR)Zhongxiang Sun, Qipeng Wang, Weijie Yu, et al.2025 · 22 citations
4. 100 Days After DeepSeek-R1: A Survey on Replication Studies and More Directions for Reasoning Language ModelsarXiv:2505.00551Chong Zhang, Yue Deng, Xiang Lin, et al.2025 · 9 citations
5. FineReason: Evaluating and Improving LLMs' Deliberate Reasoning through Reflective Puzzle SolvingAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Guizhen Chen, Weiwen Xu, Hao Zhang, et al.2025 · 6 citations
6. A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and ChallengesAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Yiyang Wei, Tingyu Song, Siyue Zhang, et al.2026

5 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/li-2025-can-we-further-elicit-reasoning/cited-by/