🔗 Who cites «Log Probabilities Are a Reliable Estimate of Semantic Plausibility in Base and Instruction-Tuned Language Models»

20 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 5 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Log Probabilities Are a Reliable Estimate of Semantic Plausibility in Base and Instruction-Tuned Language Models»

1. Auxiliary task demands mask the capabilities of smaller language modelsarXiv:2404.02418Jennifer Hu, Michael C. Frank2024 · 41 citations
2. This One or That One? A Study on Accessibility via Demonstratives with Multimodal Large Language ModelsLanguage Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)Yu Wang, Emmanuele Chersoni, Chu-Ren Huang2026 · 7 citations
3. Hey, wait a minute: on at-issue sensitivity in Language ModelsConference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL)Sanghee J. Kim, Kanishka Misra2026 · 1 citation
4. Do LLMs Capture Embodied Cognition and Cultural Variation? Cross-Linguistic Evidence from DemonstrativesAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Yu Wang, Emmanuele Chersoni, Chu-Ren Huang2026
5. The Validity of Coreference-based Evaluations of Natural Language UnderstandingarXiv:2602.16200Ian Porada2026

15 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kauf-2024-log-probabilities-reliable-estimate-semantic/cited-by/