🔗 Who cites «NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer Review»

45 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 15 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer Review»

1. Is LLM a Reliable Reviewer? A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM on Automatic Paper Reviewing TasksLanguage Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)Ruiyang Zhou, Lu Chen, Kai Yu2024 · 74 citations
2. LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)ReviewingConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Jiangshu Du, Yibo Wang, Wenting Zhao, et al.2024 · 71 citations
3. Reviewer2: Optimizing Review Generation Through Prompt GenerationarXiv:2402.10886Zhaolin Gao, Kiante Brantley, Thorsten Joachims2024 · 27 citations
4. Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and EvaluationACM Computing SurveysSteffen Eger, Yong Cao, Jennifer D'Souza, et al.2025 · 25 citations
5. AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific ResearchScience China Information SciencesQiguang Chen, Mingda Yang, Libo Qin, et al.2025 · 21 citations
6. ReviewRL: Towards Automated Scientific Review with RLConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Sihang Zeng, Kai Tian, Kaiyan Zhang, et al.2025 · 9 citations
7. Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation FrameworkTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)Nils Dycke, Iryna Gurevych2026 · 5 citations
8. NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty AssessmentFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsWenqing Wu, Yi Zhao, Yuzhuo Wang, et al.2026 · 4 citations
9. Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer ReviewAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Qian Ruan, Iryna Gurevych2026 · 2 citations
10. Decision-Making with Deliberation: Meta-reviewing as a Document-grounded DialogueConference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL)Sukannya Purkayastha, Nils Dycke, Anne Lauscher, et al.2026 · 2 citations
11. RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback GenerationFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsSihong Wu, Yiling Ma, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 2 citations
12. NUS-IDS at PragTag-2023: Improving Pragmatic Tagging of Peer Reviews through Unlabeled DataWorkshop on Argument MiningSujatha Das Gollapalli, Yixin Huang, See-Kiong Ng2023 · 2 citations
13. Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the FutureAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Sihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 1 citation
14. Implicit Bias in Peer Review: Through the Lens of Language AbstractionLanguage Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)Xulang Zhang, Rui Mao, Erik Cambria2026
15. The Double Bind: Revisiting Preprinting and Peer Review Two Years After the Removal of the ACL Anonymity PeriodFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsA Pranav, Shane Storks, Anne Lauscher2026

30 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/dycke-2023-nlpeer-unified-resource-computational-study/cited-by/