🔗 Who cites «The AI Gap: How Socioeconomic Status Affects Language Technology Interactions»

8 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 6 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «The AI Gap: How Socioeconomic Status Affects Language Technology Interactions»

1. Translation in the Hands of Many: Centering Lay Users in Machine Translation InteractionsConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Beatrice Savoldi, Alan Ramponi, Matteo Negri, et al.2025 · 16 citations
2. Lost in Simulation: LLM-Simulated Users are Unreliable Proxies for Human Users in Agentic EvaluationsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Preethi Seshadri, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Ayomide Odumakinde, et al.2026 · 5 citations
3. Anthropomimetic Uncertainty: What Verbalized Uncertainty in Language Models is MissingTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)Dennis Ulmer, Alexandra Lorson, Ivan Titov, et al.2026 · 4 citations
4. \textitOne Persona, \textitMany Cues, \textitDifferent Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM PersonalizationAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Franziska Weeber, Vera Neplenbroek, Jan Batzner, et al.2026
5. A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Automatic Speech Recognition Bias in Newcastle EnglisharXiv:2603.24549Dana Serditova, Kevin Tang2026
6. ACID: On the Perception of Online ClassismLanguage Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)Arianna Muti, Elisa Bassignana, Amanda Cercas Curry, et al.2026

2 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bassignana-2025-ai-gap-how-socioeconomic-status/cited-by/