🔗 Who cites «How Likely Do LLMs with CoT Mimic Human Reasoning?»

18 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 6 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «How Likely Do LLMs with CoT Mimic Human Reasoning?»

1. Measuring Chain of Thought Faithfulness by Unlearning Reasoning StepsConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Martin Tutek, Fateme Hashemi Chaleshtori, Ana Marasovic, et al.2025 · 15 citations
2. MetaScale: Test-Time Scaling with Evolving Meta-ThoughtsFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsQin Liu, Wenxuan Zhou, Nan Xu, et al.2026 · 7 citations
3. Analysing Chain of Thought Dynamics: Active Guidance or Unfaithful Post-hoc Rationalisation?Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Samuel Lewis-Lim, Xingwei Tan, Zhixue Zhao, et al.2025 · 5 citations
4. Quantifying the Impact of Structured Output Format on Large Language Models through Causal InferenceFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsHan Yuan, Yue Zhao, Li Zhang, et al.2026 · 2 citations
5. From Implicit to Explicit: Token-Efficient Logical Supervision for Mathematical Reasoning in LLMsFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsShaojie Wang, Liang Zhang2026
6. Minimal Free Resolution Guided Adaptive Tree ReasoningAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Dezhao Tang, Meihan Liu, Yulai Tong, et al.2026

12 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bao-2025-how-likely-do-llms-cot/cited-by/