Who cites «ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviews»
- MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific PapersarXiv:2401.04259Mike D'Arcy, Tom Hope, Larry Birnbaum, et al.2024 · 76 citations
- Is LLM a Reliable Reviewer? A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM on Automatic Paper Reviewing TasksLanguage Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)Ruiyang Zhou, Lu Chen, Kai Yu2024 · 74 citations
- Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and EvaluationACM Computing SurveysSteffen Eger, Yong Cao, Jennifer D'Souza, et al.2025 · 25 citations
- Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 ExperimentarXiv:2411.03417Alexander Goldberg, Ihsan Ullah, Thanh Gia Hieu Khuong, et al.2024 · 10 citations
- RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback GenerationFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsSihong Wu, Yiling Ma, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 2 citations
- Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the FutureAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Sihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 1 citation
- Intention-Adaptive LLM Fine-Tuning for Text Revision GenerationFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsZhexiong Liu, Diane Litman2026 · 1 citation
This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/arcy-2024-aries-corpus-scientific-paper-edits/cited-by/