Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2024 / CIDAR: Culturally Relevant Instruction Dataset For Arabic

CIDAR: Culturally Relevant Instruction Dataset For Arabic

Paper · 2024 · Zaid Alyafeai, Khalid Almubarak, Ahmed Ashraf et al.

Summary

Most Arabic instruction-tuning data is machine-translated from English or generated by English-centric LLMs, and it is rarely checked by people. As a result, models tuned on it pick up Western names, places, recipes and other cultural defaults, along with translation errors. The authors release CIDAR, an open Arabic instruction dataset of 10,000 instruction–output pairs. They built it by translating AlpaGasus with GPT-3.5 Turbo and adding Arabic-grammar Q&A crawled from the AskTheTeacher site. Twelve native-speaker volunteers then reviewed and localized every sample in a custom web annotation tool. They fixed linguistic problems, such as instructions not phrased as commands or English-specific tasks, and replaced Western content with Arab-region equivalents. Two companion evaluation sets, CIDAR-EVAL-100 and CIDAR-MCQ-100, target cultural relevance. Models fine-tuned on CIDAR showed better cultural alignment than models trained on about 30 times more data, including AceGPT. The work shows that a small, human-localized dataset can do more for cultural fit than sheer volume of translated data.

Key points

  • The dataset has 10,000 pairs: 9,109 come from AlpaGasus (a filtered subset of Stanford Alpaca), translated with GPT-3.5 Turbo via the Taqyim library, and about 891 are Arabic-language Q&A from AskTheTeacher.
  • About 64.5% of the translated AlpaGasus pairs needed edits: 3,202 instructions, 4,879 outputs, and 5,871 pairs with at least one of the two changed.
  • An NER audit with a fine-tuned CAMeLBERT model found that the top locations shifted from the United States and New York to Yemen and Egypt. Top names shifted from John and Mary to Muhammad and Sarah. Outputs also became longer after reviewers rewrote them.
  • The released suite is CIDAR, CIDAR-EVAL-100 and CIDAR-MCQ-100, available on HuggingFace under arbml/CIDAR.
  • The authors list these limitations:
    • Annotators tend to favour their own countries.
    • The data is mostly MSA, with no dialects.
    • Religious topics were deliberately excluded.
    • The dataset is small, and no RLHF was applied.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Before full annotation, the team ran a quick initial review of the machine output to list recurring failure types, and turned that list into annotator guidelines. This keeps human effort focused on real error classes instead of vague "fix anything" instructions.
  • I2. Localization was measured by running NER over the corpus before and after review and comparing entity distributions. This gives a cheap, quantitative check of whether curation actually changed content rather than just wording.
  • I3. The translation prompt framed each example as a User/Bot conversation and explicitly told the model to leave code blocks untouched. This protects spans that must not be translated while keeping the turn structure intact.
  • I4. Reviewers checked that every instruction actually starts as a command ("summarize", not "summary"). They treated mistranslated speech-act form as a defect in its own right.
  • I5. A small set rewritten by native speakers outperformed far larger translated collections on cultural fit. This argues for spending effort on careful curation rather than scale.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (learn): Before LLM-teacher output becomes silver data, a short audit pass could catalogue its typical errors and seed the self-induced repair rules.
  • I2 (learn): Comparing entity, frame or verb-class distributions between silver corpora and reference treebanks could flag skewed training data as a negative-control style check.
  • I3 (back): Generation and translation through the meta-world could mark code, numbers and named identifiers as opaque nodes that pass through the graph unchanged.
  • I4 (frames): The speech-act layer could detect imperative-versus-nominal openings and use them to validate or repair directive-type inputs.
  • I5 (answer): Fable and school-test QA sets could be kept small but manually adapted to the target readers' context, so they test understanding rather than leftover source-culture assumptions.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Zaid Alyafeai, Khalid Almubarak, Ahmed Ashraf, Deema Alnuhait, Saied Alshahrani, Gubran A. Q. Abdulrahman, Gamil Ahmed, Qais Gawah, Zead Saleh, Mustafa Ghaleb, Yousef Ali and Maged S. Al-shaibani. 2024. CIDAR: Culturally Relevant Instruction Dataset For Arabic. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.764

@inproceedings{alyafeai2024cidar,
  title = {{CIDAR: Culturally Relevant Instruction Dataset For Arabic}},
  author = {Zaid Alyafeai, Khalid Almubarak, Ahmed Ashraf, Deema Alnuhait, Saied Alshahrani, Gubran A. Q. Abdulrahman, Gamil Ahmed, Qais Gawah, Zead Saleh, Mustafa Ghaleb, Yousef Ali and Maged S. Al-shaibani},
  booktitle = {Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024},
  year = {2024},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.764},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.764}
}

References

72 references, 42 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Alberto Acerbi and Joseph M. Stubbersfield. 2023. Large language models show human-like content biases in transmission chain experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(44):e2313790120. ↗
  2. Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023. GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774. ↗
  3. Ameeta Agrawal, Lisa Singh, Elizabeth Jacobs, Yaguang Liu, Gwyneth Dunlevy, Rhitabrat Pokharel, and Varun Uppala. 2023. All Translation Tools Are Not Equal: Investigating the Quality of Language Translation for Forced Migration. In 2023 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), pages 1–10. find
  4. Hend Al-Khalifa, Khaloud Al-Khalefah, and Hesham Haroon. 2024. Error Analysis of Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) in English-to-Arabic Machine Translation. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems. ↗
  5. Ebtesam Almazrouei, Ruxandra Cojocaru, Michele Baldo, Quentin Malartic, Hamza Alobeidli, Daniele Mazzotta, Guilherme Penedo, Giulia Campesan, Mugariya Farooq, Maitha Alhammadi, Julien Launay, and Badreddine Noune. 2023. AlGhafa Evaluation Benchmark for Arabic Language Models. In Proceedings of ArabicNLP 2023, pages 244–275, Singapore (Hybrid). Association for Computational Linguistics.
  6. Saied Alshahrani, Norah Alshahrani, Soumyabrata Dey, and Jeanna Matthews. 2023. Performance Implications of Using Unrepresentative Corpora in Arabic Natural Language Processing. In Proceedings of ArabicNLP 2023, pages 218–231, Singapore (Hybrid). Association for Computational Linguistics.
  7. Saied Alshahrani, Hesham Haroon Mohammed, Ali Elfilali, Mariama Njie, and Jeanna Matthews. 2024. Leveraging Corpus Metadata to Detect Template-based Translation: An Exploratory Case Study of the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia Edition. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Open-Source Arabic Corpora and Processing Tools (OSACT) with Shared Tasks on Arabic LLMs Hallucination and Dialect to MSA Machine Translation @ LREC-COLING 2024, pages 31–45, Torino, Italia. ELRA and ICCL.
  8. Saied Alshahrani, Esma Wali, and Jeanna Matthews. 2022a. Learning From Arabic Corpora But Not Always From Arabic Speakers: A Case Study of the Arabic Wikipedia Editions. In Proceedings of the The Seventh Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop (WANLP), pages 361–371, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (Hybrid). Association for Computational Linguistics.
  9. Saied Alshahrani, Esma Wali, Abdullah R Alshamsan, Yan Chen, and Jeanna Matthews. 2022b. Roadblocks in Gender Bias Measurement for Diachronic Corpora. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change, pages 140–148, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  10. Zaid Alyafeai, Maged S Alshaibani, Badr AlKhamissi, Hamzah Luqman, Ebrahim Alareqi, and Ali Fadel. 2023. Taqyim: Evaluating Arabic NLP Tasks Using ChatGPT Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.16322. ↗
  11. Stephen Bach, Victor Sanh, Zheng Xin Yong, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Nihal V. Nayak, Abheesht Sharma, Taewoon Kim, M Saiful Bari, Thibault Fevry, Zaid Alyafeai, Manan Dey, Andrea Santilli, Zhiqing Sun, Srulik Ben-david, Canwen Xu, Gunjan Chhablani, Han Wang, Jason Fries, Maged Al-shaibani, Shanya Sharma, Urmish Thakker, Khalid Almubarak, Xiangru Tang, Dragomir Radev, Mike Tian-jian Jiang, and Alexander Rush. 2022. Prompt-Source: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Prompts. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pages 93–104, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  12. Yejin Bang, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Nayeon Lee, Wenliang Dai, Dan Su, Bryan Wilie, Holy Lovenia, Ziwei Ji, Tiezheng Yu, Willy Chung, Quyet V. Do, Yan Xu, and Pascale Fung. 2023. A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 3rd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 675–718, Nusa Dua, Bali. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  13. Eva Cetinic. 2022. The Myth of Culturally Agnostic AI Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15271v2. ↗
  14. Sahil Chaudhary. 2023. Code Alpaca: An Instruction-Following Llama Model for Code Generation. Last accessed 2024-01-15. find
  15. Lichang Chen, Shiyang Li, Jun Yan, Hai Wang, Kalpa Gunaratna, Vikas Yadav, Zheng Tang, Vijay Srinivasan, Tianyi Zhou, Heng Huang, and Hongxia Jin. 2023a. AlpaGasus: Training A Better Alpaca with Fewer Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08701. ↗
  16. Yan Chen, Christopher Mahoney, Isabella Grasso, Esma Wali, Abigail Matthews, Thomas Middleton, Mariama Njie, and Jeanna Matthews. 2021. Gender Bias and Under-Representation in Natural Language Processing Across Human Languages. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES ’21, page 24–34, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. find
  17. Zhihong Chen, Feng Jiang, Junying Chen, Tiannan Wang, Fei Yu, Guiming Chen, Hongbo Zhang, Juhao Liang, Chen Zhang, Zhiyi Zhang, Jianquan Li, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang, and Haizhou Li. 2023b. Phoenix: Democratizing ChatGPT across Languages. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10453. ↗
  18. Zhihong Chen, Shuo Yan, Juhao Liang, Feng Jiang, Xiangbo Wu, Fei Yu, Guiming Hardy Chen, Junying Chen, Hongbo Zhang, Li Jianquan, Wan Xiang, and Benyou Wang. 2023c. MultilingualSIFT: Multilingual Supervised Instruction Fine-tuning. Last accessed 2024-01-15. find
  19. Wei-Lin Chiang, Zhuohan Li, Zi Lin, Ying Sheng, Zhanghao Wu, Hao Zhang, Lianmin Zheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Yonghao Zhuang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Ion Stoica, and Eric P. Xing. 2023. Vicuna: An Open-Source Chatbot Impressing GPT-4 with 90%* Chat-GPT Quality. Last accessed 2024-01-15. find
  20. Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. 2021. Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168. ↗
  21. Mike Conover, Matt Hayes, Ankit Mathur, Jianwei Xie, Jun Wan, Sam Shah, Ali Ghodsi, Patrick Wendell, Matei Zaharia, and Reynold Xin. 2023. Free Dolly: Introducing the World’s First Truly Open Instruction-Tuned LLM. Last accessed 2024-01-15. find
  22. Marta R Costa-jussà, James Cross, Onur Çelebi, Maha Elbayad, Kenneth Heafield, Kevin Heffernan, Elahe Kalbassi, Janice Lam, Daniel Licht, Jean Maillard, et al. 2022. No language left behind: Scaling human-centered machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.04672. ↗
  23. Alok Das. 2020. Neural Machine Translation (NMT): Inherent Inadequacy, Misrepresentation, and Cultural Bias. International Journal of Translation, 32:115– 145. find
  24. Tim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2023. QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14314. ↗
  25. Huang Huang, Fei Yu, Jianqing Zhu, Xuening Sun, Hao Cheng, Dingjie Song, Zhihong Chen, Abdulmohsen Alharthi, Bang An, Ziche Liu, Zhiyi Zhang, Junying Chen, Jianquan Li, Benyou Wang, Lian Zhang, Ruoyu Sun, Xiang Wan, Haizhou Li, and Jinchao Xu. 2023. AceGPT, Localizing Large Language Models in Arabic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12053v4. ↗
  26. Go Inoue, Bashar Alhafni, Nurpeiis Baimukan, Houda Bouamor, and Nizar Habash. 2021. The Interplay of Variant, Size, and Task Type in Arabic Pre-trained Language Models. In Proceedings of the Sixth Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, pages 92–104, Kyiv, Ukraine (Virtual). Association for Computational Linguistics.
  27. Ning Ding, Yulin Chen, Bokai Xu, Yujia Qin, Shengding Hu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, and Bowen Zhou. 2023. Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversations. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3029–3051, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  28. Jiaming Ji, Tianyi Qiu, Boyuan Chen, Borong Zhang, Hantao Lou, Kaile Wang, Yawen Duan, Zhonghao He, Jiayi Zhou, Zhaowei Zhang, Fanzhi Zeng, Kwan Yee Ng, Juntao Dai, Xuehai Pan, Aidan O’Gara, Yingshan Lei, Hua Xu, Brian Tse, Jie Fu, Stephen McAleer, Yaodong Yang, Yizhou Wang, Song-Chun Zhu, Yike Guo, and Wen Gao. 2024. AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19852v3. ↗
  29. Xiangjue Dong, Yibo Wang, Philip S. Yu, and James Caverlee. 2023. Probing Explicit and Implicit Gender Bias through LLM Conditional Text Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00306v1. ↗
  30. Atoosa Kasirzadeh and Iason Gabriel. 2023. In Conversation With Artificial Intelligence: Aligning Language Models With Human Values. Philosophy & Technology, 36(2):27. ↗
  31. Galileo. 2023. LLM Hallucination Index: A Ranking and Evaluation Framework For LLM Hallucinations. Rungalileo.io. Last accessed 2024-02-13. find
  32. Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Redfield, Michael Collins, Ankur Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Kenton Lee, Kristina Toutanova, Llion Jones, Matthew Kelcey, Ming-Wei Chang, Andrew M. Dai, Jakob Uszkoreit, Quoc Le, and Slav Petrov. 2019. Natural Questions: A Benchmark for Question Answering Research. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:453–466. ↗
  33. Leo Gao, Jonathan Tow, Baber Abbasi, Stella Biderman, Sid Black, Anthony DiPofi, Charles Foster, Laurence Golding, Jeffrey Hsu, Alain Le Noac’h, Haonan Li, Kyle McDonell, Niklas Muennighoff, Chris Ociepa, Jason Phang, Laria Reynolds, Hailey Schoelkopf, Aviya Skowron, Lintang Sutawika, Eric Tang, Anish Thite, Ben Wang, Kevin Wang, and Andy Zou. 2023. A Framework for Few-Shot Language Model Evaluation. Last accessed 2024-02-13. find
  34. Biyang Guo, Xin Zhang, Ziyuan Wang, Minqi Jiang, Jinran Nie, Yuxuan Ding, Jianwei Yue, and Yupeng Wu. 2023. How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07597. ↗
  35. Nizar Habash, Houda Bouamor, and Christine Chung. 2019. Automatic Gender Identification and Reinflection in Arabic. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing, pages 155–165, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  36. Or Honovich, Thomas Scialom, Omer Levy, and Timo Schick. 2023. Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Labor. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 14409–14428, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  37. Andreas Köpf, Yannic Kilcher, Dimitri von Rütte, Sotiris Anagnostidis, Zhi-Rui Tam, Keith Stevens, Abdullah Barhoum, Nguyen Minh Duc, Oliver Stanley, Richárd Nagyfi, Shahul ES, Sameer Suri, David Glushkov, Arnav Dantuluri, Andrew Maguire, Christoph Schuhmann, Huu Nguyen, and Alexander Mattick. 2023. OpenAssistant Conversations – Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07327v2. ↗
  38. Haonan Li, Fajri Koto, Minghao Wu, Alham Fikri Aji, and Timothy Baldwin. 2023. Bactrian-X: A Multilingual Replicable Instruction-Following Model with Low-Rank Adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15011. ↗
  39. Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, and Owain Evans. 2022. TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3214–3252, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  40. Shayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson, Hyung Won Chung, Yi Tay, Denny Zhou, Quoc V. Le, Barret Zoph, Jason Wei, and Adam Roberts. 2023. The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuning. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’23. JMLR.org. ↗
  41. Maria Lopez-Medel. 2021. Gender Bias in Machine Translation: An Analysis of Google Translate in English and Spanish. Academia.edu. ↗
  42. Reem I. Masoud, Ziquan Liu, Martin Ferianc, Philip Treleaven, and Miguel Rodrigues. 2023. Cultural Alignment in Large Language Models: An Explanatory Analysis Based on Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12342v2. ↗
  43. Swaroop Mishra, Daniel Khashabi, Chitta Baral, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2022. Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructions. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3470–3487, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  44. Lowe. 2022. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.02155v1. ↗
  45. Amandalynne Paullada, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Emily M Bender, Emily Denton, and Alex Hanna. 2021. Data and its (dis) contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning research. Patterns, 2(11). ↗
  46. Baolin Peng, Chunyuan Li, Pengcheng He, Michel Galley, and Jianfeng Gao. 2023. Instruction Tuning with GPT-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03277v1. ↗
  47. Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Rida Qadri, and Ben Hutchinson. 2022. Cultural Incongruencies in Artificial Intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.13069v1. ↗
  48. Marcelo OR Prates, Pedro H Avelar, and Luís C Lamb. 2020. Assessing gender bias in machine translation: a case study with Google Translate. Neural Computing and Applications, 32:6363–6381. ↗
  49. Hamdy Mubarak, Hend Al-Khalifa, and Khaloud Suliman Alkhalefah. 2024. Halwasa: Quantify and Analyze Hallucinations in Large Language Models: Arabic as a Case Study. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024), pages 8008–8015, Torino, Italia. ELRA and ICCL.
  50. Jules Roscoe. 2024. A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine. VICE. Last accessed 2024-02-13. find
  51. Niklas Muennighoff, Thomas Wang, Lintang Sutawika, Adam Roberts, Stella Biderman, Teven Le Scao, M Saiful Bari, Sheng Shen, Zheng Xin Yong, Hailey Schoelkopf, Xiangru Tang, Dragomir Radev, Alham Fikri Aji, Khalid Almubarak, Samuel Albanie, Zaid Alyafeai, Albert Webson, Edward Raff, and Colin Raffel. 2023. Crosslingual Generalization through Multitask Finetuning. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 15991–16111, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  52. Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Teven Le Scao, Arun Raja, Manan Dey, M Saiful Bari, Canwen Xu, Urmish Thakker, Shanya Sharma, Eliza Szczechla, Taewoon Kim, Gunjan Chhablani, Nihal V. Nayak, Debajyoti Datta, Jonathan Chang, Mike Tian-Jian Jiang, Han Wang, Matteo Manica, Sheng Shen, Zheng-Xin Yong, Harshit Pandey, Michael Mckenna, Rachel Bawden, Thomas Wang, Trishala Neeraj, Jos Rozen, Abheesht Sharma, Andrea Santilli, Thibault Fevry, Jason Alan Fries, Ryan Teehan, Tali Bers, Stella Biderman, Leo Gao, Thomas Wolf, and Alexander M. Rush. 2022. Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization. In ICLR 2022 - Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations, Online. ↗
  53. Ranjita Naik, Spencer Rarrick, and Vishal Chowdhary. 2023. Reducing Gender Bias in Machine Translation through Counterfactual Data Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16362v1. ↗
  54. Tarek Naous, Michael J. Ryan, Alan Ritter, and Wei Xu. 2023. Having Beer after Prayer? Measuring Cultural Bias in Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14456v2. ↗
  55. Naseej. 2023. Noon: A 7-Billion Parameter Arabic Large Language Model. Last accessed 2024-01-15. find
  56. Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L. Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, John Schulman, Jacob Hilton, Fraser Kelton, Luke Miller, Maddie Simens, Amanda Askell, Peter Welinder, Paul Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Hadeel Saadany, Ashraf Tantawy, and Constantin Orasan. 2024. Cyber Risks of Machine Translation Critical Errors: Arabic Mental Health Tweets as a Case Study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.11668. ↗
  57. Neha Sengupta, Sunil Kumar Sahu, Bokang Jia, Satheesh Katipomu, Haonan Li, Fajri Koto, William Marshall, Gurpreet Gosal, Cynthia Liu, Zhiming Chen, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Samta Kamboj, Onkar Pandit, Rahul Pal, Lalit Pradhan, Zain Muhammad Mujahid, Massa Baali, Xudong Han, Sondos Mahmoud Bsharat, Alham Fikri Aji, Zhiqiang Shen, Zhengzhong Liu, Natalia Vassilieva, Joel Hestness, Andy Hock, Andrew Feldman, Jonathan Lee, Andrew Jackson, Hector Xuguang Ren, Preslav Nakov, Timothy Baldwin, and Eric Xing. 2023. Jais and Jais-chat: Arabic-Centric Foundation and Instruction-Tuned Open Generative Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16149. ↗
  58. Shivalika Singh, Freddie Vargus, Daniel Dsouza, Börje F. Karlsson, Abinaya Mahendiran, Wei-Yin Ko, Herumb Shandilya, Jay Patel, Deividas Mataciunas, Laura OMahony, Mike Zhang, Ramith Hettiarachchi, Joseph Wilson, Marina Machado, Luisa Souza Moura, Dominik Krzemiński, Hakimeh Fadaei, Irem Ergün, Ifeoma Okoh, Aisha Alaagib, Oshan Mudannayake, Zaid Alyafeai, Vu Minh Chien, Sebastian Ruder, Surya Guthikonda, Emad A. Alghamdi, Sebastian Gehrmann, Niklas Muennighoff, Max Bartolo, Julia Kreutzer, Ahmet Üstün, Marzieh Fadaee, and Sara Hooker. 2024. Aya Dataset: An Open-Access Collection for Multilingual Instruction Tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06619. ↗
  59. Gabriel Stanovsky, Noah A. Smith, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2019. Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1679–1684, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  60. Rohan Taori, Ishaan Gulrajani, Tianyi Zhang, Yann Dubois, Xuechen Li, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto. 2023. Stanford Alpaca: An Instruction-following LLaMA model. Last accessed 2024-01-15. find
  61. Vishesh Thakur. 2023. Unveiling Gender Bias in Terms of Profession Across LLMs: Analyzing and Addressing Sociological Implications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09162v3. ↗
  62. Yizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi, Amirreza Mirzaei, Atharva Naik, Arjun Ashok, Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran, Anjana Arunkumar, David Stap, Eshaan Pathak, Giannis Karamanolakis, Haizhi Lai, Ishan Purohit, Ishani Mondal, Jacob Anderson, Kirby Kuznia, Krima Doshi, Kuntal Kumar Pal, Maitreya Patel, Mehrad Moradshahi, Mihir Parmar, Mirali Purohit, Neeraj Varshney, Phani Rohitha Kaza, Pulkit Verma, Ravsehaj Singh Puri, Rushang Karia, Savan Doshi, Shailaja Keyur Sampat, Siddhartha Mishra, Sujan Reddy A, Sumanta Patro, Tanay Dixit, and Xudong Shen. 2022. Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5085–5109, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  63. Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M. Dai, and Quoc V. Le. 2021. Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01652v5. ↗
  64. Can Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng, Pu Zhao, Jiazhan Feng, Chongyang Tao, and Daxin Jiang. 2023. WizardLM: Empowering Large Language Models to Follow Complex Instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12244. ↗
  65. Yasbok. 2023. Alpaca Arabic Instruct. Last accessed 2024-01-15. find
  66. Brian Thompson, Mehak Preet Dhaliwal, Peter Frisch, Tobias Domhan, and Marcello Federico. 2024. A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05749. ↗
  67. Yue Yu, Yuchen Zhuang, Jieyu Zhang, Yu Meng, Alexander Ratner, Ranjay Krishna, Jiaming Shen, and Chao Zhang. 2023. Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15895v2. ↗
  68. Stefanie Ullmann and Danielle Saunders. 2021. Google Translate is sexist. What it needs is a little gender-sensitivity training. Last accessed 2024-01-15. Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric. find
  69. P Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2023. Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05685v4. ↗
  70. Bibek Upadhayay and Vahid Behzadan. 2023. TaCo: Enhancing Cross-Lingual Transfer for Low-Resource Languages in LLMs through Translation-Assisted Chain-of-Thought Processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10797. ↗
  71. Krzysztof Wach, Cong Doanh Duong, Joanna Ejdys, Rūta Kazlauskaitė, Pawel Korzynski, Grzegorz Mazurek, Joanna Paliszkiewicz, and Ewa Ziemba. 2023. The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2):7–30. ↗
  72. Yizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu, Noah A. Smith, Daniel Khashabi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023. Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 13484–13508, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/alyafeai-2024-cidar-culturally-relevant-instruction-dataset/