Austin Xu
Austin Xu has 4 papers in our library, in 2025–2026, most of them on Evaluation & benchmarks, Summarization, Reasoning; often with Shafiq Joty, Caiming Xiong, Xuan-Phi Nguyen.
OpenAlex · ORCID · Wikidata · h-index 3 · 31 works · 26 citations OpenAlex, 2026-10-14
📄 4 works in our library · 🔗 Cited 83 times in our library · 1 more in our library without a page yet · ⭐ Paper Stars ranking: #7697
Affiliations
Fields, topics and concepts
📚 Shelves 9The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 4 worksComputer Science · 4 worksArtificial Intelligence · 4 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 4 worksComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 1 workSocial Sciences · 1 workLaw · 1 workPolitical Science and International Relations · 1 workComputational Theory and Mathematics · 1 work
🧭 Topics 3Research subjects and languages the work is about.Evaluation & benchmarks · 2 worksSummarization · 1 workReasoning · 1 work
Works by year
2020s
Papers
- Direct Judgement Preference Optimization (2025 · 35 citations)
LLM-as-judge models are usually trained with supervised finetuning on fairly small datasets and cover only narrow evaluation formats, often just pairwise comparison. - Does Context Matter? ContextualJudgeBench for Evaluating LLM-based Judges in Contextual Settings (2025 · 14 citations)
LLM judges are often marketed as general-purpose evaluators, but they are rarely tested on contextual tasks such as RAG and summarization, where a response must be grounded in supplied external material. - J4R: Learning to Judge with Equivalent Initial State Group Relative Policy Optimization (2026 · 3 citations)
LLM-as-judge models handle simple tasks like chat quality well, but they struggle to evaluate reasoning-heavy outputs. - Hard2Verify: A Step-Level Verification Benchmark for Open-Ended Frontier Math (2026 · 2 citations)
Frontier LLMs now write Olympiad-level proofs, such as the gold-medal results at IMO 2025. Training and evaluating such systems requires automatic verifiers that can judge each step of a proof, not just the final answer. Existing step-level benchmarks have weaknesses: they use easy questions, outputs from weak…
All works
- A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems ↗arXiv:2504.09037 · no summary yetZixuan Ke et al.2025 · 39 citations
- Direct Judgement Preference OptimizationConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)PeiFeng Wang, Austin Xu, Yilun Zhou, et al.2025 · 35 citations
- Does Context Matter? ContextualJudgeBench for Evaluating LLM-based Judges in Contextual SettingsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Austin Xu, Srijan Bansal, Yifei Ming, et al.2025 · 14 citations
- J4R: Learning to Judge with Equivalent Initial State Group Relative Policy OptimizationAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Austin Xu, Yilun Zhou, Xuan-Phi Nguyen, et al.2026 · 3 citations
- Hard2Verify: A Step-Level Verification Benchmark for Open-Ended Frontier MathAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Shrey Pandit, Austin Xu, Xuan-Phi Nguyen, et al.2026 · 2 citations
Co-authors here
- Shafiq Joty ×4
- Caiming Xiong ×3
- Xuan-Phi Nguyen ×2
- Yifei Ming ×2
- Yilun Zhou ×2
- PeiFeng Wang
- Semih Yavuz
- Srijan Bansal
Venues
- Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) ×3: ACL 2026 ×2, ACL 2025
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP): EMNLP 2025
Cited by
Updated
This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/austin-xu/