Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / authors / Austin Xu

Austin Xu

Austin Xu has 4 papers in our library, in 2025–2026, most of them on Evaluation & benchmarks, Summarization, Reasoning; often with Shafiq Joty, Caiming Xiong, Xuan-Phi Nguyen.

4 papers in our library · 2025–2026

OpenAlex · ORCID · Wikidata · h-index 3 · 31 works · 26 citations OpenAlex, 2026-10-14

📄 4 works in our library · 🔗 Cited 83 times in our library · 1 more in our library without a page yet · ⭐ Paper Stars ranking: #7697

The profile is the library's match of the name; two people with one name are not always told apart.

Elsewhere: Google Scholar · Semantic Scholar · dblp · ACL Anthology

 Affiliations

From the bylines of their papers (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14), ORCID and Wikidata; institutions on papers are matched by machine. 1 more institution on single bylines are not listed.

 Fields, topics and concepts

Of its works in our library, with the number of works on each.

 Works by year

2020s

 Papers

The most cited first (OpenAlex and our library).

  1. Direct Judgement Preference Optimization (2025 · 35 citations)
    LLM-as-judge models are usually trained with supervised finetuning on fairly small datasets and cover only narrow evaluation formats, often just pairwise comparison.
  2. Does Context Matter? ContextualJudgeBench for Evaluating LLM-based Judges in Contextual Settings (2025 · 14 citations)
    LLM judges are often marketed as general-purpose evaluators, but they are rarely tested on contextual tasks such as RAG and summarization, where a response must be grounded in supplied external material.
  3. J4R: Learning to Judge with Equivalent Initial State Group Relative Policy Optimization (2026 · 3 citations)
    LLM-as-judge models handle simple tasks like chat quality well, but they struggle to evaluate reasoning-heavy outputs.
  4. Hard2Verify: A Step-Level Verification Benchmark for Open-Ended Frontier Math (2026 · 2 citations)
    Frontier LLMs now write Olympiad-level proofs, such as the gold-medal results at IMO 2025. Training and evaluating such systems requires automatic verifiers that can judge each step of a proof, not just the final answer. Existing step-level benchmarks have weaknesses: they use easy questions, outputs from weak…

All works

5 works of theirs in our library, the most cited first; 4 with a page here, the others link their original until we summarise them.

  1. A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems ↗arXiv:2504.09037 · no summary yetZixuan Ke et al.2025 · 39 citations

 Co-authors here

8 co-authors with a page, the most papers together first.

Venues

Where their works here were published, the most works first, with the editions of those that have a page.

 Cited by

Papers of our library cite their works 83 times (of the 149,439 papers whose bibliographies we read); 17 citing papers with a page here →.

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/austin-xu/