Mova · papers by stage
tokens → tree
Building the Universal Dependencies tree: the transition parser, the treebanks, the grammars of English as rule sources. The 50 works of Mova's own list that this stage uses · page 1 of 2; measured marks a work whose effect Mova measured in its own experiments (3 here). Each title opens our card: the summary, how Mova uses the work, its references and who cites it. What the stage does is on Mova's pipeline page; every stage is on the main list.
- Incremental Parsing with the Perceptron AlgorithmmeasuredMichael Collins, Brian Roark · 2004
What Mova took: math/src/steps.rs: word problems are solved as a transition system — the model walks through the numbers in text order and at each step chooses SHIFT (take the number), SKIP (ignore it) or REDUCE…
- A Tale of Two Parsers: Investigating and Combining Graph-based and Transition-based Dependency ParsingmeasuredYue Zhang, Stephen Clark · 2008
What Mova took:
en/src/parse.rs: the English UD parser is an arc-standard transition system (SHIFT / LEFT(label) / RIGHT(label)) with weight tables trained by an averaged perceptron. Decoding uses a beam of 8 hypotheses, and training uses beam… - Applying Occam's Razor to Transformer-Based Dependency Parsing: What Works, What Doesn't, and What is Really NecessarymeasuredStefan Grünewald, Annemarie Friedrich, Jonas Kuhn · 2021
What Mova took: the development notes of
en: the STEPS (XLM-R) result on English-EWT test, 91.91 LAS as reported in the paper, is one of the reference points in the benchmark table that Mova's own tagger and parser are measured against. - The Grammar of English GrammarsGoold Brown · 1851 (10th ed. 1880 used, Project Gutenberg #11615)
What Mova took: Cited in about 35 grammar "seeds" (curated rule notes) under en/seeds/verbal/ and en/seeds/lexicon/, and named as a source in about 30 executable rules of the English grammar expert system…
- An English Grammar: Methodical, Analytical, and HistoricalEduard Mätzner (translated by C. J. Grece) · 1874
What Mova took: Cited in about 24 seeds in en/seeds/morph/ (comparison, adjectives used as nouns, -ly and flat adverbs, articles, genitive -s, plurals, pronouns, word-formation suffixes, spelling changes) and named in 6 executable rules of the…
- Higher Lessons in English (1877/1886) and Graded Lessons in English (1877)Alonzo Reed, Brainerd Kellogg · 1877
What Mova took: Cited in about 30 seeds in en/seeds/verbal/ and en/seeds/lexicon/…
- Essentials of English Grammar for the Use of SchoolsWilliam Dwight Whitney · 1877
What Mova took: Cited in about 49 seeds in en/seeds/morph/ and named in about 28 executable rules of the grammar expert system (en/src/expert.rs).
- A New English Grammar, Logical and HistoricalHenry Sweet · 1891 (Part I: Introduction, Phonology and Accidence); Part II: Syntax, 1898
What Mova took: One of the main morphology sources: cited in about 54 seeds in en/seeds/morph/ and named in about 53 executable rules of the grammar expert system (en/src/expert.rs).
- A Grammar of Late Modern EnglishHendrik Poutsma · 1904 (first edition; the 5 volumes used are 1914–1929)
What Mova took: One of the two largest sources of the rule seeds: about 60 files, mostly in en/seeds/nominal/ and en/seeds/errors/, and about 88 executable rules of the grammar expert system (en/src/expert.rs) name it.
- A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Parts II–VIOtto Jespersen · 1914–1942 (Part II 1914)
What Mova took: The most widely cited grammar in the seeds: about 70 files across en/seeds/morph/, en/seeds/verbal/ and en/seeds/lexicon/, and about 44 executable rules of the grammar expert system (en/src/expert.rs) name it as a source.
- The Characters of the English Verb (1921); The Infinitive, the Gerund and the Participles of the English Verb (1923)Hendrik Poutsma · 1921 and 1923
What Mova took: Cited in about 21 seeds in en/seeds/lexicon/ and en/seeds/verbal/, and named in about 13 executable rules of the grammar expert system (en/src/expert.rs).
- The Philosophy of GrammarOtto Jespersen · 1924
What Mova took: Cited in 2 seeds and 3 executable rules of the grammar expert system (en/src/expert.rs).
- A Handbook of Present-Day EnglishEtsko Kruisinga · 1925 (Part I, 4th ed.); Part II, 5th ed. 1931–1932
What Mova took: Cited in about 40 seeds in en/seeds/morph/ (comparison with -er/-est and more/most, suppletive and false comparatives, flat adverbs and -ly adverbs, articles, plurals, genitives, verb forms, clitics, spelling changes) and named…
- A Dictionary of Modern English UsageH. W. Fowler · 1926 (1st edition)
What Mova took: Cited in 9 seeds in en/seeds/errors/ and named in about 15 executable error rules of the grammar expert system (en/src/expert.rs).
- A Grammar of the English Language, Vol. III: SyntaxGeorge O. Curme · 1931
What Mova took: Cited in about 34 seeds, mostly in en/seeds/nominal/…
- The Cambridge Grammar of the English LanguageRodney Huddleston, Geoffrey K. Pullum (and collaborators) · 2002 (cited in Mova as "Huddleston & Pullum 2001")
What Mova took:
en/seeds/verbal/core-objects.md— the ruleen.verbal.object-head-adjectivestates that among adjectives only worth, like and unlike take a direct object (obj/iobj) in UD. - Incrementality in Deterministic Dependency ParsingJoakim Nivre · 2004
What Mova took:
en/src/parse.rs— the dependency parser is a table-driven arc-standard transition automaton: state = stack + buffer, actions SHIFT / LEFT(label) / RIGHT(label). - The Stanford Typed Dependencies RepresentationMarie-Catherine de Marneffe, Christopher D. Manning · 2008
What Mova took:
en/seeds/errors/xcomp-no-subject.md— cited (via Mova's notes on English treebank history) for the observation that control was lost in older SD conversions, as background to the ruleen.errors.xcomp-no-subject… - Correcting Dependency Annotation ErrorsMarkus Dickinson · 2009
What Mova took: en/seeds/errors/consistency-detection-methods.md: a seed card surveying automatic ways to find annotation errors; this paper is cited for method 1…
- Annotating Coordination in the Penn TreebankWolfgang Maier et al. · 2012
What Mova took:
en/seeds/errors/coordination-structure.md— cited as background in the note on UD v2 coordination (first conjunct is the head,ccattaches to the following conjunct), which carries the rulesen.errors.conj-rightwardand… - On Grammaticality in the Syntactic Annotation of Learner LanguageMarkus Dickinson, Marwa Ragheb · 2015
What Mova took:
en/seeds/errors/literal-annotation-learner.md: background for the seed "text with errors is annotated literally". It states as a policy point that the choice between ellipsis, coordination and enumeration depends on the… - Does Universal Dependencies need a parsing representation? An investigation of EnglishNatalia Silveira, Christopher Manning · 2015
What Mova took:
en/seeds/errors/function-words-leaves.md: ruleen.errors.aux-cop-leafin the grammar expert system (en/src/expert.rs) — function words (aux,cop,case,mark, …) should be leaves with almost no dependents. The paper… - Universal Dependencies for Learner EnglishYevgeni Berzak et al. · 2016
What Mova took: en/seeds/errors/literal-annotation-learner.md: the literal-reading principle is adopted for Mova's annotation — a sentence with errors gets the tree of its actual words; spelling errors use UD's Typo=Yes/CorrectForm mechanism…
- Automatic Annotation and Evaluation of Error Types for Grammatical Error CorrectionChristopher Bryant, Mariano Felice, Ted Briscoe · 2017
What Mova took: en/seeds/errors/errant-taxonomy.md: a seed card summarising the ERRANT taxonomy and its ordered verb rules (ORTH → SPELL → same lemma → FORM → TENSE → SVA), and mapping which error types leave a visible trace in a UD tree; each…
- Assessing the Annotation Consistency of the Universal Dependencies CorporaMarie-Catherine de Marneffe et al. · 2017
What Mova took:
en/seeds/errors/consistency-detection-methods.md— method 1 ("variation nuclei") among the automatic error-detection methods Mova catalogues, with the paper's figures…