Who cites «AmbiCoref: Evaluating Human and Model Sensitivity to Ambiguous Coreference»
11 papers of our library cite it, newest first: found in their bibliographies, which we read ourselves. ← the card
- The Validity of Coreference-based Evaluations of Natural Language Understanding — 2026 · arXiv:2602.16200
- Ambiguity and Disagreement in Abstract Meaning Representation — 2025 · Proceedings of Context and Meaning: Navigating Disagreements in NLP Annotation
- Correct-Detect: Balancing Performance and Ambiguity Through the Lens of Coreference Resolution in LLMs — 2025 · Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Identification of Multiple Logical Interpretations in Counter-Arguments — 2025 · Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Who Relies More on World Knowledge and Bias for Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution: Humans or LLMs? — 2025 · Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)
- Aligning Language Models to Explicitly Handle Ambiguity — 2024 · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language Models — 2024 · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
- Clarify When Necessary: Resolving Ambiguity Through Interaction with LMs — 2023 · arXiv:2311.09469
- Reasoning about Ambiguous Definite Descriptions — 2023 · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023
- We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguity — 2023 · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Zero and Few-shot Semantic Parsing with Ambiguous Inputs — 2023 · arXiv:2306.00824