Who cites «Does Universal Dependencies need a parsing representation? An investigation of English»

10 papers of our library cite it, newest first: found in their bibliographies, which we read ourselves. ← the card

Comparing learnability of two dependency schemes: `semantic'' (UD) and `syntactic'' (SUD) — 2021 · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021
Coordination of Unlike Grammatical Functions — 2019 · Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling, SyntaxFest 2019)
The status of function words in dependency grammar: A critique of Universal Dependencies (UD) — 2019 · Glossa: a journal of general linguistics
Automatically Selecting the Best Dependency Annotation Design with Dynamic Oracles — our card · 2018 · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers)
A Systematic Comparison of Syntactic Representations of Dependency Parsing — 2017 · Proceedings of the NoDaLiDa 2017 Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW 2017)
Benchmarking Joint Lexical and Syntactic Analysis on Multiword-Rich Data — 2017 · Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Multiword Expressions (MWE 2017)
Multilingual Back-and-Forth Conversion between Content and Function Head for Easy Dependency Parsing — 2017 · Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers
Universal Dependencies are Hard to Parse – or are They? — 2017 · Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2017)
From Noisy Questions to Minecraft Texts: Annotation Challenges in Extreme Syntax Scenario — 2016 · Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (WNUT)
Should Have, Would Have, Could Have. Investigating Verb Group Representations for Parsing with Universal Dependencies. — 2016 · Proceedings of the Workshop on Multilingual and Cross-lingual Methods in NLP