Elamur Research
☰
home / papers / 1994 / Okapi at TREC-3

Okapi at TREC-3

Written for the Research library (claude-opus-5-5) from the paper text, in our own words: the license "author's copy (Microsoft Research) — read only" does not allow redistributing the text itself. Original — microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/okapi trec3.pdf

Summary

This paper reports City University's work with the Okapi retrieval system at TREC-3. Okapi was built on the classical Robertson–Sparck Jones probabilistic model. The team wanted to make it competitive again after topics lost their CONCEPTS fields, which had been the richest source of query terms. They introduced BM25, a weighting function that merges the earlier BM11 and BM15 schemes. BM25 accounts for term frequency in the document and in the query, and it normalises for document length through a tunable parameter b. The team also tested several other ideas: picking the best-matching passages at search time, expanding ad hoc queries with terms from the top documents of a trial search, and choosing routing terms one at a time by checking whether each term improves retrieval on training data. Experiments ran on TREC disks 1–3. Query expansion and stepwise term selection gave the clearest gains, while passages and the new weighting each helped a little. Together these changes produced one of the strongest automatic ad hoc runs. They also showed that a system grounded in a single theoretical model can compete with the best systems of the time.

Key points

  • BM25(k1, k2, k3, b) blends BM11 (b = 1) and BM15 (b = 0); b ≈ 0.75 was the usual setting, often paired with a larger k1.
  • Official automatic ad hoc run citya1 (BM25, passages and expansion): average precision 0.401 and P@5 0.740. The baseline BM25 run citya2 scored 0.337.
  • Development used disks 1 & 2 with topics 101–150. The official tests were ad hoc topics 151–200 and routing on disk 3.
  • Alternative term-ranking measures for feedback (RSV2, ARSV, the r criterion) did no better than the standard RSV. Stepwise selection of terms was costly to compute but very effective for routing.
  • The official interactive run cityi1 reached only 0.250 average precision, well below the automatic runs. The authors warn that the evaluation method may partly explain this gap.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

Fields: Computing & GPUs

Cited by

393 papers of our library cite it (of the 140673 whose bibliographies we read); 13 of them have a page here, 380 not yet.

Cite

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

@inproceedings{robertson1994okapi,
  title = {{Okapi at TREC-3}},
  author = {Robertson, Stephen E. and Walker, Steve and Jones, Susan and Hancock-Beaulieu, Micheline and Gatford, Mike},
  booktitle = {TREC-3 (NIST SP 500-225)},
  year = {1994},
  url = {https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/okapi_trec3.pdf}
}

References

11 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. The First Text REtrieval Conference (TREC{1) . Edited by D K Harman. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST, 1993. find
  2. Robertson S E et al . Okapi at TREC. In: [1]. p21{ 30. find
  3. The Second Text REtrieval Conference (TREC{2) . Edited by D K Harman. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST, 1994. find
  4. Robertson S E et al . Okapi at TREC{2. In: [3]. p21{34. find
  5. Robertson S E and Walker S. Some simple e ective approximations to the 2{Poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval. In: Croft W B and van Rijsbergen C J (eds). Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM{SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Dublin 1994… find
  6. Robertson S E, Walker S and Hancock-Beaulieu, M. Large test collection experiments on an operational, interactive system: Okapi at TREC. Information Processing and Management (to appear). find
  7. Robertson S E and Sparck Jones K. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27 May{June 1976 p129{146. find
  8. Robertson S E. On term selection for query expansion. Journal of Documentation 46 Dec 1990 p359{ 364. find
  9. Efthimiadis E N. A user-centred evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion. SI-GIR Forum (USA), spec. issue. , 1993, p146{59, (Paper given at: Sixteenth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 27 June-… find
  10. Callan J P. Passage-level evidence in document retrieval. In: Croft W B and van Rijsbergen C J (eds). Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM{SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Dublin 1994. Springer-Verlag 1994. (p302{310) find
  11. Evans D and Le erts R. Design and evaluation of the CLARIT{TREC{2 system. In: [3]. p137{150. find