Elamur Research
☰
home / papers / An Empirical Comparison of Parsing Methods for… / cited by

Who cites «An Empirical Comparison of Parsing Methods for Stanford Dependencies»

13 papers of our library cite it, newest first: found in their bibliographies, which we read ourselves. ← the card

  1. Abusive Language Detection using Syntactic Dependency Graphs — 2020 · Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms
  2. Language Modeling with Shared Grammar — 2019 · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  3. An Evaluation of Parser Robustness for Ungrammatical Sentences — our card · 2016 · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  4. Parsing as Language Modeling — 2016 · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  5. Towards Non-projective High-Order Dependency Parser — 2016 · Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations
  6. What Do Recurrent Neural Network Grammars Learn About Syntax? — 2016 · arXiv:1611.05774
  7. Multilingual discriminative lexicalized phrase structure parsing — 2015 · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  8. Parsing as Reduction — 2015 · Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  9. Transforming Dependencies into Phrase Structures — 2015 · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  10. A Dependency Parser for Tweets — our card · 2014 · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)
  11. A Fast and Accurate Dependency Parser using Neural Networks — our card · 2014 · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)
  12. Enforcing Structural Diversity in Cube-pruned Dependency Parsing — 2014 · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)
  13. Jointly or Separately: Which is Better for Parsing Heterogeneous Dependencies? — 2014 · Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers