TEI-Lex0 Guidelines for the Encoding of Dictionary Information on Written and Spoken Forms
Summary
The TEI Guidelines for dictionary encoding offer several ways to encode the same thing. As a result, retrodigitized dictionaries marked up in different projects are poorly interoperable. The TEI-Lex0 initiative, jointly led by ENeL, DARIAH and PARTHENOS, simplifies the TEI "Print Dictionaries" chapter into a compact baseline format. It is not meant to cover every possible case, only the most common ones. This paper describes only part of the work: the encoding of the headword form, that is, how to mark up the orthography, pronunciation and grammatical features of the lemma and its inflected forms. The authors propose a restricted set of rules. The recursive element form must always have a @type attribute. Grammatical features are recorded with a generic gram carrying a type rather than with specialized elements. Features are inherited from higher levels of the entry down to lower ones, and a lower level may override them. The paper contains no quantitative results: the rules are explained through XML examples from several languages. TEI-Lex0 is not intended for day-to-day dictionary work. It is an intermediate format for data exchange, federated search and visualization, so explicit markup matters more to it than concision.
Key points
- Values of the @type attribute for form:
lemma(the headword),inflected(individual inflected forms, such as go → went),paradigm(a partial or full paradigm, whose kind is specified by @subtype) andvariant(spelling or pronunciation variants). - Part of speech as a feature of the whole entry is recorded in
entry/gramGrp. Features of the lemma itself or of individual forms are placed in the corresponding form, and, if the entry is divided by part of speech, insense/gramGrp. - Instead of specialized TEI elements,
gram type="..."is used. Thus, if TEI later adds new elements, the TEI-Lex0 guidelines will not need to change. - Examples of variation: two American pronunciations of the word caramel in IPA; the transliterations Osama/Usama, linked through
segwith@corresp; a regional variant in the Mixtepec-Mixtec language, marked withusg[@type="geo"]/placeNameand the BCP 47 private-use subtagmix-x-YCNY. - An example of a full verbal paradigm is the Spanish perder. The authors stress that at the time of publication (eLex 2017), TEI-Lex0 was not yet a finalized specification.
Cite
@inproceedings{banski2017tei,
title = {{TEI-Lex0 Guidelines for the Encoding of Dictionary Information on Written and Spoken Forms}},
author = {Bański, Piotr and Bowers, Jack and Erjavec, Tomaž},
booktitle = {eLex 2017 (Leiden), pp. 485–494},
year = {2017},
url = {https://elex.link/elex2017/proceedings-download/}
}References
- Erjavec, T., Evans, R., Ide, N., Kilgarriff, A. (2000). The CONCEDE Model for Lexical Databases. Proceedings of the Second Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Athens, Greece, pp. 355-62. Available at: http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2000/html/summary/335.htm ↗
- Ide, N., Kilgarriff, A., Romary, L. (2000). A Formal Model of Dictionary Structure and Content. Proceedings of Euralex 2000, Stuttgart, pp. 113-126. Available at: https://www.kilgarriff.co.uk/Publications/2000-IdeKilgRomary-Euralex.pdf ↗
- Phillips, A. and M. Davis (eds). 2009. Tags for Identyfying Languages. BCP 47, RFC 5646. IETF. Available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47 ↗
- TEI Consortium, eds. (2013). Getting Started with P5 ODDs. Available at http://www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/Customization/odds.xml ↗
- TEI Consortium, eds. (2016). TEI P5: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange. [Version 3.1.0]. [Last updated on 15th December 2016]. TEI Consortium. Available at: http://www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/P5/ ([accessed on 13 th February 2017]). ↗
- This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ↗
This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/banski-2017-tei-lex0-forms/