Elamur Research
☰
home / papers / Parsing to Stanford Dependencies: Trade-offs… / cited by

Who cites «Parsing to Stanford Dependencies: Trade-offs between Speed and Accuracy»

30 papers of our library cite it, newest first: found in their bibliographies, which we read ourselves. ← the card

  1. Train Once for All: A Transitional Approach for Efficient Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extraction — 2025 · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
  2. Multilingual Lexicalized Constituency Parsing with Word-Level Auxiliary Tasks — 2017 · Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers
  3. On different approaches to syntactic analysis into bi-lexical dependencies: An empirical comparison of direct, PCFG-based, and HPSG-based parsers — 2016 · Journal of Language Modelling
  4. Transition-based dependency parsing as latent-variable constituent parsing — 2016 · Proceedings of the SIGFSM Workshop on Statistical NLP and Weighted Automata
  5. Identifying Cascading Errors using Constraints in Dependency Parsing — our card · 2015 · Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  6. Multilingual discriminative lexicalized phrase structure parsing — 2015 · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  7. A Domain-Restricted, Rule Based, English-Hindi Machine Translation System Based on Dependency Parsing — 2014 · Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Natural Language Processing
  8. An Empirical Comparison of Parsing Methods for Stanford Dependencies — our card · 2014 · arXiv:1404.4314
  9. Deterministic Parsing using PCFGs — 2014 · Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  10. A Unified Morpho-Syntactic Scheme of Stanford Dependencies — 2013 · Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)
  11. Combining PCFG-LA Models with Dual Decomposition: A Case Study with Function Labels and Binarization — 2013 · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  12. Converting Italian Treebanks: Towards an Italian Stanford Dependency Treebank — 2013 · Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse
  13. Inter-annotator Agreement for Dependency Annotation of Learner Language — 2013 · Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications
  14. Mining Scientific Terms and their Definitions: A Study of the ACL Anthology — 2013 · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  15. On Different Approaches to Syntactic Analysis Into Bi-Lexical Dependencies. An Empirical Comparison of Direct, PCFG-Based, and HPSG-Based Parsers — 2013 · Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Parsing Technologies (IWPT 2013)
  16. Transition-based Dependency Parsing with Selectional Branching — 2013 · Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  17. A Comparison of Chinese Parsers for Stanford Dependencies — 2012 · Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)
  18. Cross-Framework Evaluation for Statistical Parsing — 2012 · Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  19. KrakeN: N-ary Facts in Open Information Extraction — 2012 · Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Automatic Knowledge Base Construction and Web-scale Knowledge Extraction (AKBC-WEKEX)
  20. Parser Showdown at the Wall Street Corral: An Empirical Investigation of Error Types in Parser Output — our card · 2012 · Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning
  21. Parsing Any Domain English text to CoNLL dependencies — our card · 2012 · Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12)
  22. A Fast, Accurate, Non-Projective, Semantically-Enriched Parser — 2011 · Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  23. Evaluating Dependency Parsing: Robust and Heuristics-Free Cross-Annotation Evaluation — our card · 2011 · Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  24. From News to Comment: Resources and Benchmarks for Parsing the Language of Web 2.0 — 2011 · Proceedings of 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing
  25. Getting the Most out of Transition-based Dependency Parsing — 2011 · Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  26. Invited Paper: Bare-Bones Dependency Parsing – A Case for Occam''s Razor? — 2011 · Proceedings of the 18th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA 2011)
  27. Parser Evaluation over Local and Non-Local Deep Dependencies in a Large Corpus — our card · 2011 · Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  28. Transition-based Dependency Parsing with Rich Non-local Features — 2011 · Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  29. Benchmarking of Statistical Dependency Parsers for French — 2010 · Coling 2010: Posters
  30. Evaluating the Impact of Alternative Dependency Graph Encodings on Solving Event Extraction Tasks — 2010 · Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing