Elamur ResearchβŒ•
☰
home / papers / 2025 / MRS at SemEval-2025 Task 11: A Hybrid Approach for Bridging the Gap in Text-Based Emotion Detection

MRS at SemEval-2025 Task 11: A Hybrid Approach for Bridging the Gap in Text-Based Emotion Detection

Summary

The paper addresses SemEval-2025 Task 11, Track A: multi-label emotion recognition in short English texts. For each text, the task is to determine which of five emotions most people would perceive in the speaker's words: anger, fear, joy, sadness, or surprise. The authors propose RoEmo, a system that combines models of two types. The first, a discriminative model, is RoBERTa-large with a two-layer MLP on top. It solves a separate binary task for each emotion. The second, a generative model, is EmoT5 from the EmoLLMs family, which was previously tuned on affective instructions. It was further fine-tuned on the competition data in a text-to-text format with a dedicated prompt. The models' outputs are combined with a logical OR: an emotion is considered present if at least one of them detects it. This raises recall at the cost of a slight drop in precision, but overall macro-F1 improves. On the test set, the ensemble outperformed both individual models and placed among the top systems in the competition. The result shows that even a very simple combination of models from different paradigms yields a noticeable gain on a subjective and ambiguous task.

Key points

  • Track A data (English only): 2,768 training, 116 dev, and 2,767 test examples. Annotation was done via Amazon Mechanical Turk, and text length ranges from 4 to 121 tokens. Besides the five emotions, there are neutral examples, and a single text may contain several emotions at once.
  • Both models were trained for 15 epochs with the AdamW optimizer (learning rate 2Γ—10⁻⁡) on a single NVIDIA RTX A6000.
  • Test: RoEmo achieves a macro-F1 of 0.7659, compared with 0.7552 for RoBERTa-large and 0.747 for EmoT5; RoEmo's micro-F1 is 0.7913.
  • Dev: macro-F1 is 0.7821 for RoEmo, 0.7514 for RoBERTa-large, and 0.7625 for EmoT5.
  • On the test set, texts with anger are the hardest (F1 β‰ˆ 0.67) and texts with fear the easiest (β‰ˆ 0.86). The ensemble improved results for all emotions except joy, where RoEmo slightly underperformed both models.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words β€” not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

Fields: Linguistics & languages

Cite

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

@inproceedings{afshari2025mrs,
  title = {{MRS at SemEval-2025 Task 11: A Hybrid Approach for Bridging the Gap in Text-Based Emotion Detection}},
  author = {Afshari, Milad and Frost, Richard and Kissel, Samantha and Johnson, Kristen},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2025)},
  year = {2025},
  url = {https://aclanthology.org/2025.semeval-1.81/}
}

References

1 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. β†— leads to the work, Β«findΒ» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Abdullah Al Maruf, Fahima Khanam, Md Mahmudul Haque, Zakaria Masud Jiyad, Firoj Mridha, and Ze-yar Aung. 2024. Challenges and opportunities of text-based emotion detection: A survey. IEEE Access. *Table 4: Evaluation scores on the Test dataset* tive approach for multi-label emotion classification. \#… find

This page in Markdown β†’ https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/afshari-2025-mrs-semeval-2025-task-11/