Elamur Research
☰
home / papers / How Bad is the Problem of PP-Attachment? A… / cited by

Who cites «How Bad is the Problem of PP-Attachment? A Comparison of English, German and Swedish»

8 papers of our library cite it, newest first: found in their bibliographies, which we read ourselves. ← the card

  1. Contribution of Complex Lexical Information to Solve Syntactic Ambiguity in Basque — 2012 · Proceedings of COLING 2012
  2. A Construction Grammar Approach to Prepositional Phrase Attachment: Semantic Feature Analysis of V NP1 into NP2 Construction — 2011 · Proceedings of the 25th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation
  3. Prepositional Phrase Attachment in Shallow Parsing — 2009 · Proceedings of the International Conference RANLP-2009
  4. Prepositions in Applications: A Survey and Introduction to the Special Issue — 2009 · Computational Linguistics
  5. The Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions in the Task of Automatic Interpretation of Nominal Phrases and Compounds: A Cross-Linguistic Study — 2009 · Computational Linguistics
  6. Comparing French PP-attachment to English, German and Swedish — 2007 · Proceedings of the 16th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA 2007)
  7. Dependency-Based Hybrid Model of Syntactic Analysis for the Languages with a Rather Free Word Order — 2007 · Proceedings of the 16th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA 2007)
  8. Squibs: Prepositional Phrase Attachment without Oracles — our card · 2007 · Computational Linguistics