Who cites «How Bad is the Problem of PP-Attachment? A Comparison of English, German and Swedish»
8 papers of our library cite it, newest first: found in their bibliographies, which we read ourselves. ← the card
- Contribution of Complex Lexical Information to Solve Syntactic Ambiguity in Basque — 2012 · Proceedings of COLING 2012
- A Construction Grammar Approach to Prepositional Phrase Attachment: Semantic Feature Analysis of V NP1 into NP2 Construction — 2011 · Proceedings of the 25th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation
- Prepositional Phrase Attachment in Shallow Parsing — 2009 · Proceedings of the International Conference RANLP-2009
- Prepositions in Applications: A Survey and Introduction to the Special Issue — 2009 · Computational Linguistics
- The Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions in the Task of Automatic Interpretation of Nominal Phrases and Compounds: A Cross-Linguistic Study — 2009 · Computational Linguistics
- Comparing French PP-attachment to English, German and Swedish — 2007 · Proceedings of the 16th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA 2007)
- Dependency-Based Hybrid Model of Syntactic Analysis for the Languages with a Rather Free Word Order — 2007 · Proceedings of the 16th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA 2007)
- Squibs: Prepositional Phrase Attachment without Oracles — our card · 2007 · Computational Linguistics