Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2025 / Conformity in Large Language Models

Conformity in Large Language Models

Paper · 2025 · Xiaochen Zhu, Caiqi Zhang, Tom Stafford et al.

Summary

LLMs increasingly serve as conversational partners and as members of multi-agent ensembles. A tendency to side with a majority, even a wrong one, can therefore undermine their usefulness. The authors adapt the classic Asch conformity paradigm to LLMs. In a scripted dialogue, the model answers a question last, after p−1 "confederates" have all given the same distractor answer. They then measure how often the model switches to the distractor (conformity level) versus keeps its original answer (resistance level). For objective tasks, only questions the model first answered correctly are retained, which separates conformity from simple lack of knowledge. Experiments cover Llama-3, Qwen2, Gemma-2 and Mistral-v0.3 on objective and subjective datasets, varying training stage, confederate tone and agreement among confederates. Every model conformed to some degree in all domains. Lower initial confidence predicted more conformity, instruction-tuned models resisted better than base models, and more natural majority phrasing strengthened the effect. Two training-free prompting strategies reduce conformity, which supports building more reliable collaborative systems.

Key points

  • Benchmarks: MMLU, BigBenchHard (e.g., Object Counting), PopQA and CommonsenseQA for objective questions; Politiscale and OpinionsQA for subjective ones. The number of dialogue participants ranges from 2 to 10.
  • Confederate conditions are Unanimous or Diverse. In the Diverse control, answers are drawn at random, so there is no majority to follow. Tones are Plain (the base condition), Neutral, Confident and Uncertain.
  • The authors say no prior work has demonstrated what they find: a model that is more confident in its initial prediction is less prone to switching to an incorrect majority answer (p < 0.001).
  • Instruction-tuned variants are less susceptible than pre-trained base models. Conversational, natural-sounding majority responses increase conformity.
  • Mitigations:
    • Devil's Advocate: adds a dissenting wrong answer that breaks unanimity, inspired by Janis (1972). It also transfers to sycophancy mitigation.
    • Question Distillation: replaces the repeated majority answers with a short summary.
    • Code is released at github.com/SpaceHunterInf/llm_conformity.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Xiaochen Zhu, Caiqi Zhang, Tom Stafford, Nigel Collier and Andreas Vlachos. 2025. Conformity in Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers).

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.195

@inproceedings{zhu2025conformity,
  title = {{Conformity in Large Language Models}},
  author = {Xiaochen Zhu, Caiqi Zhang, Tom Stafford, Nigel Collier and Andreas Vlachos},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.195},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.195}
}

References

70 references, 20 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Gati V. Aher, Rosa I. Arriaga, and Adam Tauman Kalai. 2023. Using large language models to simulate multiple humans and replicate human subject studies. https://www.flaticon.com ↗
  2. In International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2023, 23-29 July 2023, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, volume 202 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 337–371. PMLR. find
  3. Vernon L Allen and John M Levine. 1969. Consensus and conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(4):389–399. find
  4. Solomon E Asch. 1951. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Groups, Leadership and Men: Research in Human Relations, page 177. find
  5. Solomon E Asch. 1955. Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5):31–35. find
  6. Solomon E Asch. 1956. Studies of independence and conformity: I. a minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 70(9):1. find
  7. Razan Baltaji, Babak Hemmatian, and Lav Varshney. 2024. Conformity, confabulation, and impersonation: Persona inconstancy in multi-agent LLM collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Cross-Cultural Considerations in NLP, pages 17–31, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Lingui… find
  8. Robert S Baron, Joseph A Vandello, and Bethany Brun-sman. 1996. The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(5):915. find
  9. Stéphane Bernard, Paul Harris, Nathalie Terrier, and Fabrice Clément. 2015. Children weigh the number of informants and perceptual uncertainty when identifying objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 136:70–81. find
  10. B Douglas Bernheim. 1994. A theory of conformity. Journal of political Economy, 102(5):841–877. find
  11. Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter,… — Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
  12. Jiaqi Chen, Yuxian Jiang, Jiachen Lu, and Li Zhang. 2024a. S-agents: self-organizing agents in open-ended environment. ArXiv preprint, abs/2402.04578. find
  13. Yulong Chen, Yang Liu, Jianhao Yan, Xuefeng Bai, Ming Zhong, Yinghao Yang, Ziyi Yang, Chenguang Zhu, and Yue Zhang. 2024b. See what LLMs cannot answer: A self-challenge framework for uncovering LLM weaknesses. In First Conference on Language Modeling. find
  14. Robert B Cialdini and Noah J Goldstein. 2004. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55(1):591–621. find
  15. Conobi. 2018. PolitiScales - About — politiscales.party. https://politiscales.party/about. [Accessed 01-10-2024]. ↗
  16. Richard S Crutchfield. 1955. Conformity and character. American psychologist, 10(5):191. find
  17. Nicola De Cao, Wilker Aziz, and Ivan Titov. 2021. Editing factual knowledge in language models. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 6491– 6506, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  18. Fabrizio Dell’Acqua, Edward McFowland III, Ethan R Mollick, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, Katherine Kellogg, Saran Rajendran, Lisa Krayer, François Candelon, and Karim R Lakhani. 2023. Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of ai on knowledge worker productiv… find
  19. Dorottya Demszky, Diyi Yang, David S Yeager, Christopher J Bryan, Margarett Clapper, Susannah Chandhok, Johannes C Eichstaedt, Cameron Hecht, Jeremy Jamieson, Meghann Johnson, et al. 2023. Using large language models in psychology. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(11):688–701. find
  20. Morton Deutsch and Harold B Gerard. 1955. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 51(3):629. find
  21. Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Jingjing Xu, and Zhifang Sui. 2023. A survey on in-context learning. ArXiv preprint, abs/2301.00234.
  22. Xueyang Feng, Zhi-Yuan Chen, Yujia Qin, Yankai Lin, Xu Chen, Zhiyuan Liu, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2024. Large language model-based human-agent collaboration for complex task solving. ArXiv preprint, abs/2402.12914. find
  23. Donelson R Forsyth. 2014. Wadsworth Cengage Learning. find
  24. Isabel O Gallegos, Ryan A Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, and Nesreen K Ahmed. 2024. Bias and fairness in large language models: A survey. Computational Linguistics, pages 1–79.
  25. Gemma, Morgane Riviere, Shreya Pathak, Pier Giuseppe Sessa, Cassidy Hardin, Surya Bhupatiraju, Léonard Hussenot, Thomas Mesnard, Bobak Shahriari, Alexandre Ramé, Johan Ferret, Peter Liu, Pouya Tafti, Abe Friesen, Michelle Casbon, Sabela Ramos, Ravin Kumar, Charline Le Lan, Sammy Jerome, Anton Tsitsu… find
  26. Lewis Griffin, Bennett Kleinberg, Maximilian Mozes, Kimberly Mai, Maria Do Mar Vau, Matthew Caldwell, and Augustine Mavor-Parker. 2023. Large language models respond to influence like humans. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Influence in Conversations (SICon 2023), pages 15–24, Toronto… find
  27. Taicheng Guo, Xiuying Chen, Yaqi Wang, Ruidi Chang, Shichao Pei, Nitesh V. Chawla, Olaf Wiest, and Xiangliang Zhang. 2024. Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI…
  28. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net.
  29. Sirui Hong, Xiawu Zheng, Jonathan Chen, Yuheng Cheng, Jinlin Wang, Ceyao Zhang, Zili Wang, Steven Ka Shing Yau, Zijuan Lin, Liyang Zhou, et al. 2023. Metagpt: Meta programming for multi-agent collaborative framework. ArXiv preprint, abs/2308.00352.
  30. Tiancheng Hu and Nigel Collier. 2024. Quantifying the persona effect in LLM simulations. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 10289–10307, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  31. Tiancheng Hu, Yara Kyrychenko, Steve Rathje, Nigel Collier, Sander van der Linden, and Jon Roozenbeek. 2025. Generative language models exhibit social identity biases. Nature Computational Science, 5(1):65–75. find
  32. Irving L Janis. 1972. Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. find
  33. Albert Q. Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, Lélio Renard Lavaud, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Pierre Stock, Teven Le Scao, Thibaut Lavril, Thomas Wang, Timothée Lacroix,… find
  34. Mandar Joshi, Eunsol Choi, Daniel Weld, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2017. TriviaQA: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1601–1611, Vancouver…
  35. Georgi Karadzhov, Andreas Vlachos, and Tom Stafford. 2024. The effect of diversity on group decision-making. ArXiv preprint, abs/2402.01427. — [arXiv:2402.01427](https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01427) find
  36. Enkelejda Kasneci, Kathrin Seßler, Stefan Küchemann, Maria Bannert, Daryna Dementieva, Frank Fischer, Urs Gasser, Georg Groh, Stephan Günnemann, Eyke Hüllermeier, et al. 2023. Chatgpt for good? on opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual difference…
  37. Luoma Ke, Song Tong, Peng Cheng, and Kaiping Peng. 2024. Exploring the frontiers of llms in psychological applications: A comprehensive review. find
  38. Akbir Khan, John Hughes, Dan Valentine, Laura Ruis, Kshitij Sachan, Ansh Radhakrishnan, Edward Grefenstette, Samuel R. Bowman, Tim Rocktäschel, and Ethan Perez. 2024. Debating with more persuasive llms leads to more truthful answers. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML… find
  39. Justin Kruger and David Dunning. 1999. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(6):1121. find
  40. Woosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng, Lianmin Zheng, Cody Hao Yu, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Hao Zhang, and Ion Stoica. 2023. Efficient memory management for large language model serving with pagedattention. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles.
  41. Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, and Jimeng Sun. 2024. Generating with confidence: Uncertainty quantification for black-box large language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. find
  42. Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, Shashank Gupta, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Katherine Hermann, Sean Welleck, Amir Yazdanbakhsh, and Peter Clark. 2023. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with… find
  43. Alex Mallen, Akari Asai, Victor Zhong, Rajarshi Das, Daniel Khashabi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023. When not to trust language models: Investigating effectiveness of parametric and non-parametric memories. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (V… find
  44. Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber. 2017. The enigma of reason. Harvard University Press. find
  45. Meta. 2024. Llama 3 model card. find
  46. Thomas JH Morgan, Kevin N Laland, and Paul L Harris. 2015. The development of adaptive conformity in young children: effects of uncertainty and consensus. Developmental science, 18(4):511–524. find
  47. Mehdi Moussaïd, Juliane E Kämmer, Pantelis P Analytis, and Hansjörg Neth. 2013. Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation. PloS one, 8(11):e78433. find
  48. Roberto Navigli, Simone Conia, and Björn Ross. 2023. Biases in large language models: origins, inventory, and discussion. ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality, 15(2):1–21. find
  49. Bhrij Patel, Vishnu Sashank Dorbala, and Amrit Singh Bedi. 2024. Embodied question answering via multi-llm systems. ArXiv preprint, abs/2406.10918. — [arXiv:2406.10918](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10918) find
  50. Ethan Perez, Sam Ringer, Kamile Lukosiute, Karina Nguyen, Edwin Chen, Scott Heiner, Craig Pettit, Catherine Olsson, Sandipan Kundu, Saurav Kadavath, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Benjamin Mann, Brian Israel, Bryan Seethor, Cameron McKinnon, Christopher Olah, Da Yan, Daniela Amodei, Dario Amodei, Dawn Drain… — Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations
  51. Leonardo Ranaldi, Elena Ruzzetti, Davide Venditti, Dario Onorati, and Fabio Zanzotto. 2024. A trip towards fairness: Bias and de-biasing in large language models. In Proceedings of the 13th Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM 2024), pages 372–384, Mexico City, Mexico. Assoc… find
  52. Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. 2023. Whose opinions do language models reflect? In International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2023, 23-29 July 2023, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, volume 202 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research,…
  53. Mrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak, David Duvenaud, Amanda Askell, Samuel R. Bowman, Esin Durmus, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Scott R. Johnston, Shauna Kravec, Timothy Maxwell, Sam McCandlish, Kamal Ndousse, Oliver Rausch, Nicholas Schiefer, Da Yan, Miranda Zhang, and Ethan Perez. 2024. Towards underst…
  54. Joseph P Simmons and Leif D Nelson. 2006. Intuitive confidence: choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 135(3):409. find
  55. Sophie Sowden, Sofia Koletsi, Eva Lymberopoulos, Elisabeta Militaru, Caroline Catmur, and Geoffrey Bird. 2018. Quantifying compliance and acceptance through public and private social conformity. Consciousness and cognition, 65:359–367. find
  56. Dan Sperber, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. Epistemic vigilance. Mind & language, 25(4):359–393. find
  57. Mirac Suzgun, Nathan Scales, Nathanael Schärli, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yi Tay, Hyung Won Chung, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, Denny Zhou, and Jason Wei. 2023. Challenging BIG-bench tasks and whether chain-of-thought can solve them. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: A…
  58. Alon Talmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and Jonathan Berant. 2019. CommonsenseQA: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies,…
  59. An Yang, Baosong Yang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Chengpeng Li, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Guanting Dong, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jialong Tang, Jialin Wang, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Ma, Jianxin Yang, Jin Xu, Jingren Zhou, Jinze Bai, Jinzheng He, Juny… find
  60. Ruihan Yang, Caiqi Zhang, Zhisong Zhang, Xinting Huang, Sen Yang, Nigel Collier, Dong Yu, and Deqing Yang. 2024b. Logu: Long-form generation with uncertainty expressions. Preprint, arXiv:2410.14309.
  61. Eunice Yiu, Eliza Kosoy, and Alison Gopnik. 2024. Transmission versus truth, imitation versus innovation: What children can do that large language and language-and-vision models cannot (yet). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(5):874–883. find
  62. Yue Yu, Yuchen Zhuang, Jieyu Zhang, Yu Meng, Alexander J. Ratner, Ranjay Krishna, Jiaming Shen, and Chao Zhang. 2023. Large language model as attributed training data generator: A tale of diversity and bias. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Informa…
  63. Caiqi Zhang, Zhijiang Guo, and Andreas Vlachos. 2024a. Do we need language-specific fact-checking models? the case of Chinese. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1899–1914, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  64. Caiqi Zhang, Fangyu Liu, Marco Basaldella, and Nigel Collier. 2024b. LUQ: Long-text uncertainty quantification for LLMs. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5244–5262, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  65. Caiqi Zhang, Ruihan Yang, Zhisong Zhang, Xinting Huang, Sen Yang, Dong Yu, and Nigel Collier. 2024c. Atomic calibration of llms in long-form generations. Preprint, arXiv:2410.13246. find
  66. Hanning Zhang, Shizhe Diao, Yong Lin, Yi Fung, Qing Lian, Xingyao Wang, Yangyi Chen, Heng Ji, and Tong Zhang. 2024d. R-tuning: Instructing large language models to say ‘I don’t know’. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics… find
  67. Jintian Zhang, Xin Xu, and Shumin Deng. 2023. Exploring collaboration mechanisms for llm agents: A social psychology view. ArXiv preprint, abs/2310.02124.
  68. Yang Zhang, Shixin Yang, Chenjia Bai, Fei Wu, Xiu Li, Xuelong Li, and Zhen Wang. 2024e. Towards efficient llm grounding for embodied multi-agent collaboration. ArXiv preprint, abs/2405.14314. find
  69. Zhaohan Zhang, Ziquan Liu, and Ioannis Patras. 2025. Get confused cautiously: Textual sequence memorization erasure with selective entropy maximization. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 10924–10939, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Association for Computational…
  70. Ce Zheng, Lei Li, Qingxiu Dong, Yuxuan Fan, Zhiyong Wu, Jingjing Xu, and Baobao Chang. 2023. Can we edit factual knowledge by in-context learning? In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 4862–4876, Singapore. Association for Computational Ling… find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhu-2025-conformity-large-language-models/