🔗 Who cites «Is LLM a Reliable Reviewer? A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM on Automatic Paper Reviewing Tasks»

48 papers of our library cite it (of the 141,840 whose bibliographies we read) · 2 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Is LLM a Reliable Reviewer? A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM on Automatic Paper Reviewing Tasks»

1. LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation MethodsarXiv:2412.05579Haitao Li, Qian Dong, Junjie Chen, et al.2024 · 189 citations
   LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)ReviewingConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Jiangshu Du, Yibo Wang, Wenting Zhao, et al.2024 · 71 citations

46 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhou-2024-is-llm-reliable-reviewer-comprehensive/cited-by/