🔗 Who cites «A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark»

35 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 5 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark»

1. Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Toward Knowledge-Independent Evaluation of LLMs' Legal Reasoning CapabilitiesConference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL)Hongseok Oh, Wonseok Hwang, Kyoung-Woon On2026 · 3 citations
2. ALARB: An Arabic Legal Argument Reasoning BenchmarkArabic Natural Language Processing Conference (ArabicNLP)Harethah Abu Shairah, Somayah AlHarbi, Abdulaziz AlHussein, et al.2025 · 3 citations
3. OpenExempt: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Legal Reasoning and a Framework for Creating Custom Benchmarks on DemandFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsSergio Servantez, Sarah B. Lawsky, Rajiv Jain, et al.2026 · 2 citations
4. A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and ChallengesAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Yiyang Wei, Tingyu Song, Siyue Zhang, et al.2026
5. GradeLegal: Automated Grading for German Legal CasesarXiv:2605.21076Abdullah Al Zubaer, Lorenz Wendlinger, Simon Alexander Nonn, et al.2026

30 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zheng-2025-reasoning-focused-legal-retrieval-benchmark/cited-by/