🔗 Who cites «Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic Evaluation»

6 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 4 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic Evaluation»

1. AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific ResearchScience China Information SciencesQiguang Chen, Mingda Yang, Libo Qin, et al.2025 · 21 citations
2. ReviewRL: Towards Automated Scientific Review with RLConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Sihang Zeng, Kai Tian, Kaiyan Zhang, et al.2025 · 9 citations
3. Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation FrameworkTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)Nils Dycke, Iryna Gurevych2026 · 5 citations
4. Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the FutureAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Sihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 1 citation

2 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhang-2025-reviewing-scientific-papers-critical-problems/cited-by/