Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / Are Transformers universal approximators of… / cited by

Who cites «Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?»

61 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 13 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?»

  1. RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position EmbeddingarXiv:2104.09864Jianlin Su, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, et al.2021 · 3,028 citations
  2. Big Bird: Transformers for Longer SequencesConference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)Manzil Zaheer, Guru Guruganesh, Avinava Dubey, et al.2020 · 1,023 citations
  3. What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear modelsarXiv:2211.15661Ekin Akyürek, Dale Schuurmans, Jacob Andreas, et al.2022 · 236 citations
  4. Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language ModelsarXiv:2404.09932Usman Anwar, Abulhair Saparov, Javier Rando, et al.2024 · 87 citations
  5. Teaching Arithmetic to Small TransformersarXiv:2307.03381Nayoung Lee, Kartik Sreenivasan, Jason D. Lee, et al.2023 · 57 citations

48 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yun-2019-transformers-universal-approximators-sequence-sequence/cited-by/