🔗 Who cites «RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation»

2 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 1 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation»

1. Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the FutureAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Sihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 1 citation

1 more paper of our library cites it; it has no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wu-2026-rbtact-rebuttal-as-supervision-actionable/cited-by/