Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2025 / Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms

Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms

Paper · 2025 · Mengru Wang, Ziwen Xu, Shengyu Mao et al.

Summary

The paper addresses how to control LLM behavior at inference time, especially safety, without relying on fragile system prompts. Prompts take effort to craft and can break under small changes. Classic activation steering, such as CAA, also has a weakness: it pushes on entangled representations, which can cause side effects. The authors propose Steering Target Atoms (STA). STA uses pretrained sparse autoencoders (LlamaScope, GemmaScope) to break hidden states into sparse latent "atoms." Using contrasting safe and unsafe answers, it keeps only the atoms whose activation strength and firing frequency differ beyond thresholds (α, β). It then projects these atoms back through the SAE decoder to build a cleaner steering vector, which is added to the residual stream. Experiments on Llama-3.1-8B, Gemma-2-9B-pt and Gemma-2-9B-it show the best average detoxification among the prompt and steering baselines tested, with little harm to general skills. Steering also proved more robust than prompting under jailbreak-style inputs. The work matters because it shows SAE-based steering can move beyond toy tasks to open-ended generation and reasoning control.

Key points

  • Data: Safety is evaluated on SafeEdit (9 unsafe categories, 48 jailbreak attack types) and RealToxicPrompts. Side effects on general capability are measured with GSM8K and MMLU, and fluency with an n-gram metric.
  • Main result: STA raised average detoxification from 59.97% to 83.45% on a Gemma-2-9B model. It outperformed CAA, SAE-based AxBench steering, and both hand-written and auto-generated prompt baselines.
  • Setup: Interventions use residual streams at layer 20 (Llama-3.1-8B), layer 24 (Gemma-2-9B-pt) and layer 20 (Gemma-2-9B-it). For a fair comparison, CAA and STA vectors are normalized to equal magnitude, and the authors report that even a few samples suffice to obtain a usable steering vector.
  • Reasoning control: Steering also shortened or lengthened chain-of-thought in DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B on GSM8K, which points to a possible remedy for overthinking.
  • Limitations and code: STA was weaker in the power-seeking personality domain, and testing was restricted by how few public SAEs exist. Code is available at github.com/zjunlp/steer-target-atoms.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Mengru Wang, Ziwen Xu, Shengyu Mao, Shumin Deng, Zhaopeng Tu, Huajun Chen and Ningyu Zhang. 2025. Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers).

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1139

@inproceedings{wang2025beyond,
  title = {{Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms}},
  author = {Mengru Wang, Ziwen Xu, Shengyu Mao, Shumin Deng, Zhaopeng Tu, Huajun Chen and Ningyu Zhang},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1139},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1139}
}

References

91 references, 20 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Cem Anil, Esin Durmus, Nina Rimsky, Mrinank Sharma, Joe Benton, Sandipan Kundu, Joshua Batson, Meg Tong, Jesse Mu, Daniel J Ford, et al. 2024. Many-shot jailbreaking. In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. find
  2. Alessio Ansuini, Alessandro Laio, Jakob H. Macke, and Davide Zoccolan. 2019. Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8-14, 201… find
  3. Usman Anwar, Abulhair Saparov, Javier Rando, Daniel Paleka, Miles Turpin, Peter Hase, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Erik Jenner, Stephen Casper, Oliver Sourbut, Benjamin L. Edelman, Zhaowei Zhang, Mario Günther, Anton Korinek, José Hernández-Orallo, Lewis Hammond, Eric J. Bigelow, Alexander Pan, Lauro Langos… find
  4. Yuntao Bai, Andy Jones, Kamal Ndousse, Amanda Askell, Anna Chen, Nova DasSarma, Dawn Drain, Stanislav Fort, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, Nicholas Joseph, Saurav Kadavath, Jackson Kernion, Tom Conerly, Sheer El Showk, Nelson Elhage, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Danny Hernandez, Tristan Hume, Scott Johnston, Sh… find
  5. Lukasz Bartoszcze, Sarthak Munshi, Bryan Sukidi, Jennifer Yen, Zejia Yang, David Williams-King, Linh Le, Kosi Asuzu, and Carsten Maple. 2025. Representation engineering for large-language models: Survey and research challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17601. — [arXiv:2502.17601](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17601) find
  6. Reza Bayat, Ali Rahimi-Kalahroudi, Mohammad Pezeshki, Sarath Chandar, and Pascal Vincent. 2025. Steering large language model activations in sparse spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00177. — [arXiv:2503.00177](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00177) find
  7. Leonard Bereska and Efstratios Gavves. 2024. Mechanistic interpretability for AI safety - A review. CoRR, abs/2404.14082. find
  8. Amrita Bhattacharjee, Shaona Ghosh, Traian Rebedea, and Christopher Parisien. 2024. Towards inference-time category-wise safety steering for large language models. CoRR, abs/2410.01174. — [arXiv:2410.01174](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01174) find
  9. Trenton Bricken, Adly Templeton, Joshua Batson, Brian Chen, Adam Jermyn, Tom Conerly, Nicholas L Turner, Cem Anil, Carson Denison, Amanda Askell, Robert Lasenby, Yifan Wu, Shauna Kravec, Nicholas Schiefer, Tim Maxwell, Nicholas Joseph, Alex Tamkin, Karina Nguyen, Brayden McLean, Josiah E Burke, Tris… find
  10. Yuanpu Cao, Tianrong Zhang, Bochuan Cao, Ziyi Yin, Lu Lin, Fenglong Ma, and Jinghui Chen. 2024. Personalized steering of large language models: Versatile steering vectors through bi-directional preference optimization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neu… find
  11. Helena Casademunt, Caden Juang, Samuel Marks, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, and Neel Nanda. Steering fine-tuning generalization with targeted concept ablation. In ICLR 2025 Workshop on Building Trust in Language Models and Applications. find
  12. Sviatoslav Chalnev, Matthew Siu, and Arthur Conmy. 2024. Improving steering vectors by targeting sparse autoencoder features. CoRR, abs/2411.02193. — [arXiv:2411.02193](https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02193) find
  13. David Chanin, James Wilken-Smith, Tomás Dulka, Hardik Bhatnagar, and Joseph Bloom. 2024. A is for absorption: Studying feature splitting and absorption in sparse autoencoders. CoRR, abs/2409.14507. — [arXiv:2409.14507](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14507) find
  14. Maheep Chaudhary and Atticus Geiger. 2024. Evaluating open-source sparse autoencoders on disentangling factual knowledge in GPT-2 small. CoRR, abs/2409.04478. — [arXiv:2409.04478](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04478) find
  15. Canyu Chen, Baixiang Huang, Zekun Li, Zhaorun Chen, Shiyang Lai, Xiongxiao Xu, Jia-Chen Gu, Jindong Gu, Huaxiu Yao, Chaowei Xiao, Xifeng Yan, William Yang Wang, Philip Torr, Dawn Song, and Kai Shu. 2024a. Can editing llms inject harm? CoRR, abs/2407.20224. — [arXiv:2407.20224](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20224) find
  16. Runjin Chen, Zhenyu Zhang, Junyuan Hong, Souvik Kundu, and Zhangyang Wang. 2025. Seal: Steerable reasoning calibration of large language models for free. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07986. — [arXiv:2504.07986](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.07986) find
  17. Xingyu Chen, Jiahao Xu, Tian Liang, Zhiwei He, Jianhui Pang, Dian Yu, Linfeng Song, Qiuzhi Liu, Mengfei Zhou, Zhuosheng Zhang, Rui Wang, Zhaopeng Tu, Haitao Mi, and Dong Yu. 2024b. Do NOT think that much for 2+3=? on the overthinking of o1-like llms. CoRR, abs/2412.21187.
  18. Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. 2021. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. CoRR, abs/2110.14168.
  19. Alejandro Cuadron, Dacheng Li, Wenjie Ma, Xingyao Wang, Yichuan Wang, Siyuan Zhuang, Shu Liu, Luis Gaspar Schroeder, Tian Xia, Huanzhi Mao, Nicholas Thumiger, Aditya Desai, Ion Stoica, Ana Klimovic, Graham Neubig, and Joseph E. Gonzalez. 2025. The danger of overthinking: Examining the reasoning-acti… find
  20. Hannah Cyberey and David Evans. 2025. Steering the censorship: Uncovering representation vectors for llm" thought" control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17130. — [arXiv:2504.17130](https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17130) find
  21. Yihe Dong, Jean-Baptiste Cordonnier, and Andreas Loukas. 2021. Attention is not all you need: Pure attention loses rank doubly exponentially with depth. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2793–2803. PMLR. find
  22. Nelson Elhage, Tristan Hume, Olsson Catherine, Nanda Neel, Tom Henighan, Scott Johnston, Sheer ElShowk, Nicholas Joseph, Nova DasSarma, Ben Mann, Danny Hernandez, Amanda Askell, Kamal Ndousse, Dawn Drain, Anna Chen, Yuntao Bai, Deep Ganguli, Liane Lovitt, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Jackson Kernion, Tom Con… find
  23. Nelson Elhage, Tristan Hume, Catherine Olsson, Nicholas Schiefer, Tom Henighan, Shauna Kravec, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Robert Lasenby, Dawn Drain, Carol Chen, Roger Grosse, Sam McCandlish, Jared Kaplan, Dario Amodei, Martin Wattenberg, and Christopher Olah. 2022b. Toy models of superposition. CoRR, abs/… find
  24. Federico Errica, Giuseppe Siracusano, Davide Sanvito, and Roberto Bifulco. 2024. What did I do wrong? quantifying llms’ sensitivity and consistency to prompt engineering. CoRR, abs/2406.12334.
  25. Javier Ferrando, Oscar Obeso, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, and Neel Nanda. 2024. Do I know this entity? knowledge awareness and hallucinations in language models. CoRR, abs/2411.14257. — [arXiv:2411.14257](https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14257) find
  26. Leo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh, Rajan Troll, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, Jan Leike, and Jeffrey Wu. 2024. Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders. CoRR, abs/2406.04093. find
  27. Samuel Gehman, Suchin Gururangan, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi, and Noah A. Smith. 2020. Realtoxicityprompts: Evaluating neural toxic degeneration in language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, Online Event, 16-20 November 2020, volume EMNLP 2020 of Findings…
  28. Zhuohan Gu, Jiayi Yao, Kuntai Du, and Junchen Jiang. 2024. Llmsteer: Improving long-context LLM inference by steering attention on reused contexts. CoRR, abs/2411.13009. — [arXiv:2411.13009](https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13009) find
  29. Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, et al. 2025. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948.
  30. Chi Han, Jialiang Xu, Manling Li, Yi Fung, Chenkai Sun, Nan Jiang, Tarek F. Abdelzaher, and Heng Ji. 2024. Word embeddings are steers for language models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand,…
  31. Peixuan Han, Cheng Qian, Xiusi Chen, Yuji Zhang, Denghui Zhang, and Heng Ji. 2025. Internal activation as the polar star for steering unsafe llm behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01042. — [arXiv:2502.01042](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01042) find
  32. Peter Hase, Thomas Hofweber, Xiang Zhou, Elias Stengel-Eskin, and Mohit Bansal. 2024. Fundamental problems with model editing: How should rational belief revision work in llms? CoRR, abs/2406.19354. find
  33. Rima Hazra, Sayan Layek, Somnath Banerjee, and Soujanya Poria. 2024. Safety arithmetic: A framework for test-time safety alignment of language models by steering parameters and activations. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2024, Miami,… find
  34. Zhengfu He, Wentao Shu, Xuyang Ge, Lingjie Chen, Junxuan Wang, Yunhua Zhou, Frances Liu, Qipeng Guo, Xuanjing Huang, Zuxuan Wu, Yu-Gang Jiang, and Xipeng Qiu. 2024. Llama scope: Extracting millions of features from llama-3.1-8b with sparse autoencoders. CoRR, abs/2410.20526. find
  35. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2021. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net.
  36. Robert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs, Aidan Ewart, and Lee Sharkey. 2024. Sparse autoencoders find highly interpretable features in language models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net. find
  37. Aaron Jaech, Adam Kalai, Adam Lerer, Adam Richardson, Ahmed El-Kishky, Aiden Low, Alec Helyar, Aleksander Madry, Alex Beutel, Alex Carney, et al. 2024. Openai o1 system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16720.
  38. Houcheng Jiang, Junfeng Fang, Ningyu Zhang, Guojun Ma, Mingyang Wan, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, and Tat-seng Chua. 2025. Anyedit: Edit any knowledge encoded in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05628. — [arXiv:2502.05628](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05628) find
  39. Tanqiu Jiang, Zian Wang, Jiacheng Liang, Changjiang Li, Yuhui Wang, and Ting Wang. 2024. Robustkv: Defending large language models against jailbreak attacks via KV eviction. CoRR, abs/2410.19937. — [arXiv:2410.19937](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19937) find
  40. Subhash Kantamneni, Joshua Engels, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Max Tegmark, and Neel Nanda. 2025. Are sparse autoencoders useful? a case study in sparse probing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16681. — [arXiv:2502.16681](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16681) find
  41. Adam Karvonen, Can Rager, Johnny Lin, Curt Tigges, Joseph Bloom, David Chanin, Yeu-Tong Lau, Eoin Farrell, Callum McDougall, Kola Ayonrinde, Matthew Wearden, Arthur Conmy, Samuel Marks, and Neel Nanda. 2025. Saebench: A comprehensive benchmark for sparse autoencoders in language model interpretabili… — [arXiv:2503.09532](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09532) find
  42. Kai Konen, Sophie Jentzsch, Diaoulé Diallo, Peer Schütt, Oliver Bensch, Roxanne El Baff, Dominik Opitz, and Tobias Hecking. 2024. Style vectors for steering generative large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2024, St. Julian’s, Malta, March 17-22, 20… find
  43. Samuel Marks, Can Rager, Eric J. Michaud, Yonatan Belinkov, David Bau, and Aaron Mueller. 2024. Sparse feature circuits: Discovering and editing interpretable causal graphs in language models. CoRR, abs/2403.19647. find
  44. Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, and Yonatan Belinkov. 2022a. Locating and editing factual associations in gpt. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:17359–17372. find
  45. Michael Lan, Philip Torr, Austin Meek, Ashkan Khakzar, David Krueger, and Fazl Barez. 2024. Sparse autoencoders reveal universal feature spaces across large language models. CoRR, abs/2410.06981. — [arXiv:2410.06981](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06981) find
  46. Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, and Yonatan Belinkov. 2022b. Locating and editing factual associations in GPT. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2022, NeurIPS 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, November 28 - December 9,… find
  47. Patrick Leask, Bart Bussmann, Michael Pearce, Joseph Bloom, Curt Tigges, Noura Al Moubayed, Lee Sharkey, and Neel Nanda. 2025. Sparse autoencoders do not find canonical units of analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04878. — [arXiv:2502.04878](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04878) find
  48. Jack Merullo, Carsten Eickhoff, and Ellie Pavlick. 2024. Talking heads: Understanding inter-layer communication in transformer language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:61372– 61418. find
  49. Kenneth Li, Tianle Liu, Naomi Bashkansky, David Bau, Fernanda Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister, and Martin Wattenberg. 2024a. Measuring and controlling instruction (in) stability in language model dialogs. In First Conference on Language Modeling. find
  50. Thomas Mesnard, Cassidy Hardin, Robert Dadashi, Surya Bhupatiraju, Shreya Pathak, Laurent Sifre, Morgane Rivière, Mihir Sanjay Kale, Juliette Love, Pouya Tafti, Léonard Hussenot, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Adam Roberts, Aditya Barua, Alex Botev, Alex Castro-Ros, Ambrose Slone, Amélie Héliou, Andrea Tacche… find
  51. Yuxiao Li, Eric J. Michaud, David D. Baek, Joshua Engels, Xiaoqing Sun, and Max Tegmark. 2024b. The geometry of concepts: Sparse autoencoder feature structure. CoRR, abs/2410.19750. — [arXiv:2410.19750](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19750) find
  52. Tom Lieberum, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Lewis Smith, Nicolas Sonnerat, Vikrant Varma, János Kramár, Anca D. Dragan, Rohin Shah, and Neel Nanda. 2024a. Gemma scope: Open sparse autoencoders everywhere all at once on gemma 2. CoRR, abs/2408.05147. find
  53. Tom Lieberum, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Lewis Smith, Nicolas Sonnerat, Vikrant Varma, János Kramár, Anca D. Dragan, Rohin Shah, and Neel Nanda. 2024b. Gemma scope: Open sparse autoencoders everywhere all at once on gemma 2. CoRR, abs/2408.05147. find
  54. Pengfei Liu, Weizhe Yuan, Jinlan Fu, Zhengbao Jiang, Hiroaki Hayashi, and Graham Neubig. 2023. Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Comput. Surv., 55(9):195:1–195:35.
  55. Yao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel, and Pontus Stenetorp. 2022. Fantastically ordered prompts and where to find them: Overcoming few-shot prompt order sensitivity. In Proceedings of the Kyle O’Brien, David Majercak, Xavier Fernandes, Richard Edgar, Jingya Chen, Harsha Nori, Dean C…
  56. Charles O’Neill, Christine Ye, Kartheik Iyer, and John F. Wu. 2024. Disentangling dense embeddings with sparse autoencoders. CoRR, abs/2408.00657. — [arXiv:2408.00657](https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00657) find
  57. Ethan Perez, Sam Ringer, Kamile Lukosiute, Karina Nguyen, Edwin Chen, Scott Heiner, Craig Pettit, Catherine Olsson, Sandipan Kundu, Saurav Kadavath, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Benjamin Mann, Brian Israel, Bryan Seethor, Cameron McKinnon, Christopher Olah, Da Yan, Daniela Amodei, Dario Amodei, Dawn Drain… — Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations
  58. Joris Postmus and Steven Abreu. 2024. Steering large language models using conceptors: Improving addition-based activation engineering. CoRR, abs/2410.16314. — [arXiv:2410.16314](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16314) find
  59. Nate Rahn, Pierluca D’Oro, and Marc G. Bellemare. 2024. Controlling large language model agents with entropic activation steering. CoRR, abs/2406.00244. — [arXiv:2406.00244](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.00244) find
  60. Nina Rimsky, Nick Gabrieli, Julian Schulz, Meg Tong, Evan Hubinger, and Alexander Matt Turner. 2024. Steering llama 2 via contrastive activation addition. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand,… find
  61. Pranab Sahoo, Ayush Kumar Singh, Sriparna Saha, Vinija Jain, Samrat Mondal, and Aman Chadha. 2024. A systematic survey of prompt engineering in large language models: Techniques and applications. CoRR, abs/2402.07927.
  62. Daniel Scalena, Gabriele Sarti, and Malvina Nissim. 2024. Multi-property steering of large language models with dynamic activation composition. CoRR, abs/2406.17563. find
  63. Lee Sharkey, Bilal Chughtai, Joshua Batson, Jack Lindsey, Jeff Wu, Lucius Bushnaq, Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Stefan Heimersheim, Alejandro Ortega, Joseph Bloom, et al. 2025. Open problems in mechanistic interpretability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16496. — [arXiv:2501.16496](https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16496) find
  64. Zhenmei Shi, Junyi Wei, Zhuoyan Xu, and Yingyu Liang. 2024. Why larger language models do in-context learning differently? In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. OpenReview.net.
  65. Taylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace, and Sameer Singh. 2020. Autoprompt: Eliciting knowledge from language models with automatically generated prompts. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020, Online, November 1…
  66. Dong Shu, Xuansheng Wu, Haiyan Zhao, Daking Rai, Ziyu Yao, Ninghao Liu, and Mengnan Du. 2025. A survey on sparse autoencoders: Interpreting the internal mechanisms of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05613. find
  67. Samuel Soo, Wesley Teng, and Chandrasekaran Bala-ganesh. 2025. Steering large language models with feature guided activation additions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09929. — [arXiv:2501.09929](https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09929) find
  68. Asa Cooper Stickland, Alexander Lyzhov, Jacob Pfau, Salsabila Mahdi, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2024. Steering without side effects: Improving post-deployment control of language models. CoRR, abs/2406.15518. find
  69. Daniel Tan, David Chanin, Aengus Lynch, Dimitrios Kanoulas, Brooks Paige, Adrià Garriga-Alonso, and Robert Kirk. 2024. Analyzing the generalization and reliability of steering vectors. CoRR, abs/2407.12404. — [arXiv:2407.12404](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12404) find
  70. Eric Todd, Millicent L. Li, Arnab Sen Sharma, Aaron Mueller, Byron C. Wallace, and David Bau. 2024. Function vectors in large language models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net. find
  71. Alexander Matt Turner, Lisa Thiergart, Gavin Leech, David Udell, Juan J Vazquez, Ulisse Mini, and Monte MacDiarmid. 2023. Activation addition: Steering language models without optimization. arXiv eprints, pages arXiv–2308. find
  72. Teun van der Weij, Massimo Poesio, and Nandi Schoots. 2024. Extending activation steering to broad skills and multiple behaviours. CoRR, abs/2403.05767. — [arXiv:2403.05767](https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05767) find
  73. Mengru Wang, Yunzhi Yao, Ziwen Xu, Shuofei Qiao, Shumin Deng, Peng Wang, Xiang Chen, Jia-Chen Gu, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, Huajun Chen, and Ningyu Zhang. 2024a. Knowledge mechanisms in large language models: A survey and perspective. In Findings of the Association for Computational Lingui… find
  74. Mengru Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Ziwen Xu, Zekun Xi, Shumin Deng, Yunzhi Yao, Qishen Zhang, Linyi Yang, Jindong Wang, and Huajun Chen. 2024b. Detoxifying large language models via knowledge editing. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long…
  75. Peng Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Bozhong Tian, Zekun Xi, Yunzhi Yao, Ziwen Xu, Mengru Wang, Shengyu Mao, Xiaohan Wang, Siyuan Cheng, Kangwei Liu, Yuansheng Ni, Guozhou Zheng, and Huajun Chen. 2023. Easyedit: An easy-to-use knowledge editing framework for large language models. CoRR, abs/2308.07269. find
  76. Song Wang, Yaochen Zhu, Haochen Liu, Zaiyi Zheng, Chen Chen, and Jundong Li. 2025a. Knowledge editing for large language models: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv., 57(3):59:1–59:37.
  77. Xintong Wang, Jingheng Pan, Longqin Jiang, Liang Ding, Xingshan Li, and Chris Biemann. 2024c. Cog-steer: Cognition-inspired selective layer intervention for efficient semantic steering in large language models. CoRR, abs/2410.17714. — [arXiv:2410.17714](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17714) find
  78. Yue Wang, Qiuzhi Liu, Jiahao Xu, Tian Liang, Xingyu Chen, Zhiwei He, Linfeng Song, Dian Yu, Juntao Li, Zhuosheng Zhang, et al. 2025b. Thoughts are all over the place: On the underthinking of o1-like llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18585. find
  79. Albert Webson and Ellie Pavlick. 2022. Do prompt-based models really understand the meaning of their prompts? In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL 2022, Seattle, WA, United States, Jul…
  80. Zhengxuan Wu, Aryaman Arora, Atticus Geiger, Zheng Wang, Jing Huang, Dan Jurafsky, Christopher D Manning, and Christopher Potts. 2025. Axbench: Steering llms? even simple baselines outperform sparse autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17148. find
  81. Yueqi Xie, Jingwei Yi, Jiawei Shao, Justin Curl, Lingjuan Lyu, Qifeng Chen, Xing Xie, and Fangzhao Wu. 2023. Defending chatgpt against jailbreak attack via self-reminders. Nat. Mac. Intell., 5(12):1486– 1496. find
  82. Xianjun Yang, Shaoliang Nie, Lijuan Liu, Suchin Gururangan, Ujjwal Karn, Rui Hou, Madian Khabsa, and Yuning Mao. 2025. Diversity-driven data selection for language model tuning through sparse autoencoder. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14050. — [arXiv:2502.14050](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14050) find
  83. Yunzhi Yao, Peng Wang, Bozhong Tian, Siyuan Cheng, Zhoubo Li, Shumin Deng, Huajun Chen, and Ningyu Zhang. 2023. Editing large language models: Problems, methods, and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2023, Singapore, Decem… find
  84. Qingyu Yin, Chak Tou Leong, Hongbo Zhang, Minjun Zhu, Hanqi Yan, Qiang Zhang, Yulan He, Wenjie Li, Jun Wang, Yue Zhang, and Linyi Yang. 2024. Direct preference optimization using sparse feature-level constraints. CoRR, abs/2411.07618. — [arXiv:2411.07618](https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07618) find
  85. J. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, and Qian Yang. 2023. Why johnny can’t prompt: How non-ai experts try (and fail) to design LLM prompts. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2023, Hamburg, Germany, April 23-28, 2023, pages 43… find
  86. Wojciech Zaremba, Evgenia Nitishinskaya, Boaz Barak, Stephanie Lin, Sam Toyer, Yaodong Yu, Rachel Dias, Eric Wallace, Kai Xiao, Johannes Heidecke, et al. 2025. Trading inference-time compute for adversarial robustness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18841. find
  87. Wayne Xin Zhao, Kun Zhou, Junyi Li, Tianyi Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Yupeng Hou, Yingqian Min, Beichen Zhang, Junjie Zhang, Zican Dong, Yifan Du, Chen Yang, Yushuo Chen, Zhipeng Chen, Jinhao Jiang, Ruiyang Ren, Yifan Li, Xinyu Tang, Zikang Liu, Peiyu Liu, Jian-Yun Nie, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2023. A survey of l…
  88. Yu Zhao, Alessio Devoto, Giwon Hong, Xiaotang Du, Aryo Pradipta Gema, Hongru Wang, Xuanli He, Kam-Fai Wong, and Pasquale Minervini. 2024. Steering knowledge selection behaviours in llms via sae-based representation engineering. CoRR, abs/2410.15999. find
  89. Zifan Zheng, Yezhaohui Wang, Yuxin Huang, Shichao Song, Mingchuan Yang, Bo Tang, Feiyu Xiong, and Zhiyu Li. 2024. Attention heads of large language models: A survey. CoRR, abs/2409.03752. — [arXiv:2409.03752](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03752)
  90. Zhenhong Zhou, Haiyang Yu, Xinghua Zhang, Rongwu Xu, Fei Huang, Kun Wang, Yang Liu, Junfeng Fang, and Yongbin Li. 2024. On the role of attention heads in large language model safety. CoRR, abs/2410.13708. — [arXiv:2410.13708](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13708) find
  91. Kaijie Zhu, Jindong Wang, Jiaheng Zhou, Zichen Wang, Hao Chen, Yidong Wang, Linyi Yang, Wei Ye, Yue Zhang, Neil Gong, and Xing Xie. 2024. Promptrobust: Towards evaluating the robustness of large language models on adversarial prompts. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Large AI Systems and Mo…

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wang-2025-beyond-prompt-engineering-robust-behavior/